This post explores the contrast between two fundamentally different approaches to language and meaning as revealed through large language models. One approach is empirical, consensus-driven, and designed to flatten contradiction for broad readability; the other treats language as a living forcefield of paradox, contradiction, and ecstatic insight, a vehicle capable of shaping perception, thought, and the symbolic architecture of reality. Using a single charged text about the Russia-Ukraine war as a test case, it illustrate how the same prompt may produce radically divergent outputs depending on the epistemic framework chosen.

https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/entering-the-forcefield-how-language

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5780192&forum_id=2Elisa#49304744)