Waterboy was a 180 but weird “procedural” flaw
| Delicious Bunny | 02/23/26 | | Delicious Bunny | 02/25/26 | | Yummy Phase Pol Pot | 02/25/26 | | fulano | 02/25/26 | | ,.,,.,.,,,,,,..................... | 02/25/26 | | Senior Ethics Official | 02/25/26 | | Nazca Redlines | 02/25/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 23rd, 2026 6:38 PM Author: Delicious Bunny
Meaning obviously the movie was far fetched but a procedural flaw that almost ruined the movie.
Why after he made the first like 10 sacks/tackles in the first game were his teammates still disgruntled towards him/not high fiving him.
IRL that would’ve never happened. After he made 1 or 2 the team would’ve warmed up to him.
Other than that, the “outlandish” storyline sort of worked.
Also fun fact/test. Lawyers fuckin HATE waterboy. Everyone I mention it too “oh I’m too intelligent for that!” Or “it’s too slapstick!”
Meanwhile they got 164 LSATs. Try creating “The Complete Idiots Guide to Coaching College Football” as a midwit
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5837671&forum_id=2Elisa#49690225) |
Date: February 25th, 2026 8:48 AM
Author: ,.,,.,.,,,,,,.....................
Some important points made in this thread.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5837671&forum_id=2Elisa#49693842) |
|
|