\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Good article about Clause 9.2 works with 7.6

“The 20-month feud between the Western Hemisphere&rsqu...
marvelous genital piercing
  07/20/25
759144711186508463273
spruce pontificating hissy fit
  07/20/25
...
yapping famous landscape painting
  07/21/25
The clause at the center of the Exxon-Chevron feud involves ...
marvelous genital piercing
  07/20/25
...
marvelous genital piercing
  07/21/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 20th, 2025 11:42 AM
Author: marvelous genital piercing

“The 20-month feud between the Western Hemisphere’s two most powerful oil companies over the biggest offshore discovery in a generation hinged on a single clause of a contract few people have ever seen.”

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-07-20/how-one-clause-sparked-exxon-chevron-feud-that-turned-personal

https://archive.ph/Y4Qbx

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752626&forum_id=2Elisa#49116300)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 20th, 2025 11:43 AM
Author: spruce pontificating hissy fit

759144711186508463273

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752626&forum_id=2Elisa#49116302)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 21st, 2025 10:27 AM
Author: yapping famous landscape painting



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752626&forum_id=2Elisa#49118502)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 20th, 2025 1:54 PM
Author: marvelous genital piercing

The clause at the center of the Exxon-Chevron feud involves a preemption right in a joint operating agreement (JOA) for the Stabroek oil block in Guyana. Specifically, it gave Exxon and its partners (including CNOOC) the right of first refusal if another partner attempted to sell its interest in the oil field.

When Chevron announced its $53 billion acquisition of Hess — which includes Hess’s 30% stake in the Stabroek block — Exxon invoked this clause, arguing that it had the contractual right to match or block the sale of that stake. Chevron and Hess countered that the clause didn’t apply to corporate-level mergers, only to asset-level sales.

This disagreement triggered arbitration and nearly derailed the Chevron-Hess merger. Exxon saw the clause as essential for protecting its investment and operational control in Guyana, while Chevron viewed Exxon’s stance as a strategic move to interfere with a major acquisition.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752626&forum_id=2Elisa#49116560)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 21st, 2025 10:26 AM
Author: marvelous genital piercing



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752626&forum_id=2Elisa#49118501)