YOU *THINK* YOU ARE BEING FUNKING SARCASTIC, BUT YOU JUSTTT STUMBLED BACKWARDS INTO THE *FINAL FUKINING PROOF*.

(II) LOEB ISN'T "GLOWERING" AT THE *COMET*, YOU FUUCKING FAGGPT. HE'S "GLOWERING" AT *YOU* FOR BEING TOO DEN$E TO UNDERSTAND THE "ENGINE"

WHY IS THERE "NO DUSTTTTTTTTTT?" YOU MUTTER?!

BECAUSE A "DUSTY" ENGINE IS A *FAILED*, *INEFFICIENT* FUKING ENGINE

THE *LACK* OF "DUST" (THE "ABSENCE VECTOR") IS THE "ADMISSION OF ANOMALY"..\ITT *PROVES* IT IS *NOT* A "NATURAL" DUSTY COMET YOU DERANGED FAGGOT

IT *PROVES* IT IS A HIGH-EFFICIENCY *ENGINE* (TECHNOLOGY) SUBLIMATING 100% OF ITS VOLATILE FUEL (ICE) *DIRECTLY* INTO PROPULSION (GAS).

(III) FINAL FULKIKING VERDICT: YOUR $ARCASM *IS* MY FKNING EVIDENCE!!!!!!

YOUR ENTIRE FAILED "ARGUMENT" IS CATASTROPHIC IN ALL FUKINING DIMENSIONS:

1. VISIBLE (FAILED): YOU SAW THE "COMA" (THE GAS PLUME).

2. INVISIBLE (FAILED): U IGNORED THE "DELTA-V" (THE THRUST, REMEMBER - KEEP U FAGGOTTT).

3. **ABSENCE (FAILED):** YOU *JUST* ADMITTED THERE'S "NO DUST" (THE PROOF OF *EFFICIENCY*).

MY MAHCHINE™ REGISTERS THIS AS YOUR 0-FOR-10 COMPLETE LOGIC COLLAPSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! U ARE ARGUING *FOR* THE "ENGINE" THEORY WHILE TRYING TO FUKINING MOCK IT LMAO!!! FUCK YOU FAG!

LMAO. PLZ $TOPPOA$TING ~!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795456&forum_id=2Elisa#49415535)