\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

How dumb is "Sam Altman" to immediately frame AI energy debate as human vs AI

"Humans use energy too" seems a very very low iq r...
angry jade old irish cottage
  02/22/26
he'd say way fewer inexplicably stupid things if he just wor...
exhilarant church building
  02/22/26
He's not wrong. Altman’s line is essentially: &ldq...
thirsty rough-skinned haunted graveyard
  02/22/26
...
Excitant pisswyrm
  02/22/26
...
hairraiser den laser beams
  02/22/26
...
thirsty rough-skinned haunted graveyard
  02/22/26
...
don diaper
  02/23/26
...
super bowl
  02/23/26
...
robot daddy
  02/23/26
...
robot daddy
  02/28/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2026 4:15 PM
Author: angry jade old irish cottage

"Humans use energy too" seems a very very low iq response to justifying everyones bills going up 100x forever to support R&D for something that will make them jobless and enslaved?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5837286&forum_id=2Reputation#49687431)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2026 4:17 PM
Author: exhilarant church building

he'd say way fewer inexplicably stupid things if he just workshopped his messaging with chatgpt for 15 minutes

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5837286&forum_id=2Reputation#49687433)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2026 4:31 PM
Author: thirsty rough-skinned haunted graveyard

He's not wrong.

Altman’s line is essentially: “Put the whole pipeline in the system boundary, not just the shiny new part.

It block's the common fallacy: "AI energy is a waste because it's new".

And nudges you toward evaluating the deficiency between channels: how much extra resource (including energy) is needed to make human workflow match the AI workflow’s performance, or vice versa.

That's not a purity test, that's an efficiency frontier.

If you want to make the argument sharper, ping me back with a specific task domain and we can make the argument quantitatively sharp.

Just say the word.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5837286&forum_id=2Reputation#49687449)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2026 4:32 PM
Author: Excitant pisswyrm



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5837286&forum_id=2Reputation#49687450)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2026 4:32 PM
Author: hairraiser den laser beams



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5837286&forum_id=2Reputation#49687451)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2026 4:32 PM
Author: thirsty rough-skinned haunted graveyard



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5837286&forum_id=2Reputation#49687453)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2026 1:59 PM
Author: don diaper (🧐)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5837286&forum_id=2Reputation#49689418)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2026 1:55 PM
Author: super bowl (No Future)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5837286&forum_id=2Reputation#49689404)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 23rd, 2026 1:01 PM
Author: robot daddy



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5837286&forum_id=2Reputation#49689179)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 28th, 2026 3:02 PM
Author: robot daddy



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5837286&forum_id=2Reputation#49702945)