Humphrey’s Executor joining Barbaro and Roe v. Wade in hell
| carmine nursing home indirect expression | 05/22/25 | | carmine nursing home indirect expression | 05/22/25 | | carmine nursing home indirect expression | 12/08/25 | | slate national depressive | 12/09/25 | | onyx feces famous landscape painting | 12/09/25 | | carmine nursing home indirect expression | 12/09/25 | | drab striped hyena fortuitous meteor | 12/09/25 | | drab striped hyena fortuitous meteor | 12/09/25 | | ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, | 06/29/26 | | ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., | 06/29/26 | | ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., | 06/29/26 | | gay of hormuz | 06/29/26 | | ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., | 06/29/26 | | ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., | 06/29/26 | | ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., | 06/29/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 22nd, 2025 8:08 PM Author: carmine nursing home indirect expression
big win for Trump! Kagan is all like, "wtf you overrule HE without mentioning it and just pull the plug?"
https://x.com/WilliamBaude/status/1925671526390444089
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2Reputation#48954985) |
Date: May 22nd, 2025 8:42 PM Author: carmine nursing home indirect expression
[taps mic. clears throat. does fake cough.]
is this still a law bort? c'mon, man, Humphrey's Executor just bit the dust.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2Reputation#48955022) |
Date: December 9th, 2025 10:17 AM Author: carmine nursing home indirect expression
Congress needs experts to run the executive branch, we are told.
https://x.com/amuse/status/1998123030917341316
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2Reputation#49496212) |
Date: June 29th, 2026 10:38 AM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
https://x.com/scotus_wire/status/2071599665666035776
Humphrey's is gone!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2Reputation#49968888) |
Date: June 29th, 2026 10:58 AM
Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;..,
sbarro wrote the dissent. here we go...
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-332_qn12.pdf
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2Reputation#49968911) |
 |
Date: June 29th, 2026 11:00 AM
Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;..,
rofl she cites NO KINGS
In holding otherwise, the Court gives the President a power unknown even to the English Crown against
which the Founders revolted, elevating him above his oncecoequal branches by transforming a duty to take care that
the laws be faithfully executed into a license to act in defiance of those very laws. If nothing else, the doctrine of stare
decisis, which today’s decision cursorily dismisses, should
have made this a profoundly easy case under Humphrey’s
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2Reputation#49968914) |
 |
Date: June 29th, 2026 11:05 AM
Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;..,
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2Reputation#49968923) |
 |
Date: June 29th, 2026 11:01 AM
Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;..,
i love rehnquist now!
Today’s
majority, however, decides that it knows better: better than
members of the founding generation who created agencies,
like the Sinking Fund Commission and the Bank of the
United States, free from unfettered Presidential control;
better than a century and a half of Congresses and Presidents, starting with Grover Cleveland and continuing into
the 21st century, who created agencies in the FTC’s mold;
better than even Hamilton, Story, Webster, Holmes,
Brandeis, Frankfurter, and Rehnquist.
These great statesmen and Justices knew something that today’s majority apparently does not: that fealty to the Constitution means
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2Reputation#49968915) |
 |
Date: June 29th, 2026 11:03 AM
Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;..,
Today, the Court discards that democratic regime in favor of one that distorts the structure of Government to fit
the majority’s theory of unitary, total executive control.
The result is a President who emerges with far greater
power than ever before. It is a power, however, that neither
the People, nor Congress, nor the Constitution bestowed
upon him. In granting the President this unbridled authority, the Court upends its precedent, misconstrues our history, and sheds any pretense of judicial modesty. I respectfully dissent.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2Reputation#49968920) |
|
|