fuck Maersk
| Frum Chestnut Plaza | 09/18/25 | | Floppy free-loading skinny woman | 09/18/25 | | pontificating copper area | 09/25/25 | | Frum Chestnut Plaza | 09/18/25 | | lascivious french chef | 09/18/25 | | Frum Chestnut Plaza | 09/18/25 | | Frum Chestnut Plaza | 09/25/25 | | Frum Chestnut Plaza | 09/26/25 | | Frum Chestnut Plaza | 09/26/25 | | Frum Chestnut Plaza | 09/26/25 | | Frum Chestnut Plaza | 09/29/25 | | Salmon police squad | 09/29/25 | | Frum Chestnut Plaza | 09/30/25 | | Frum Chestnut Plaza | 09/30/25 | | Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e | 10/21/25 | | Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e | 10/21/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: September 30th, 2025 1:31 AM Author: Frum Chestnut Plaza Subject: Re: ADM v. Maersk (Clause 9.2)
Re: re: Query Re: Vendor Hierarchy (ADM/Maersk)
Your distinction has been noted and logged as redundant. Maersk is filed under:
- Logistics & Maritime Decay; ADM is filed under Agribusiness & Heartland Decay.
Both are cross-referenced in the Master File titled 'Inevitable Asset Liquidation.'
Your sorghum was an acceptable loss.
This is fine.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5777083&forum_id=2Reputation#49313458) |
|
|