The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| fishy pungent locale indirect expression | 01/06/26 | | Massive Center | 01/06/26 | | Aggressive Drab Piazza | 01/06/26 | | Massive Center | 01/06/26 | | Aggressive Drab Piazza | 01/06/26 | | Massive Center | 01/06/26 | | fishy pungent locale indirect expression | 01/06/26 | | Massive Center | 01/06/26 | | fishy pungent locale indirect expression | 01/06/26 | | Histrionic Amber School Cafeteria Tank | 01/07/26 | | Orchid vigorous den | 01/06/26 | | electric ticket booth | 01/06/26 | | Aggressive Drab Piazza | 01/06/26 | | Aqua Base | 01/06/26 | | Aggressive Drab Piazza | 01/06/26 | | soul-stirring startling public bath | 01/06/26 | | Floppy chest-beating french chef whorehouse | 01/06/26 | | beady-eyed wagecucks clown | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: Massive Center
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2Reputation#49568134) |
|
|