The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
The shomrim laws are very tedious to go through
| Drunken Stage | 08/15/25 |
| aqua razzmatazz faggot firefighter karate | 08/15/25 |
| Drunken Stage | 08/15/25 |
| transparent floppy stain | 08/15/25 |
| Diverse hospital giraffe | 08/15/25 |
| Drunken Stage | 08/15/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 15th, 2025 7:07 AM Author: Drunken Stage (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762665&forum_id=2Reputation#49187123) |
Date: August 15th, 2025 7:25 AM Author: aqua razzmatazz faggot firefighter karate This is the fundamental of western bailment law. It’s incredibly complicated in the Talmud. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762665&forum_id=2Reputation#49187145) |
 |
Date: August 15th, 2025 7:30 AM Author: Drunken Stage If you're classified as a "borrower" or "shoel" there's an inexplicable exception to your liability over the watched object If the owner is with you even if you've already transferred possession and are in use of the object and this object is damaged or destroyed you're not legally obligated to replace or compensate for it I don't understand why |
|
Date: August 15th, 2025 10:39 AM Author: transparent floppy stain The Talmud does not supply a reason because it's a biblical edict. This law is derived from a close reading of the Bible verse describing the laws of a borrower. https://www.bible.com/bible/406/EXO.22.14-19.ERV
The reason probably is because the borrower cannot be considered a full bailee when the owner is present. |
|
Date: August 15th, 2025 10:01 AM Author: Diverse hospital giraffe Was just talking about this down at the feed store (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762665&forum_id=2Reputation#49187315) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2025 10:15 AM Author: Drunken Stage Chuck's? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762665&forum_id=2Reputation#49187348) |