Trump is clearly entitled to a directed verdict in the NY case
| indecent laser beams | 05/21/24 | | autistic hall toaster | 05/21/24 | | Cerebral Home | 05/21/24 | | Chest-beating Razzle Cuck Library | 05/21/24 | | costumed locus lettuce | 05/21/24 | | Hairraiser Resort | 05/21/24 | | autistic hall toaster | 05/21/24 | | costumed locus lettuce | 05/21/24 | | disrespectful onyx cruise ship goal in life | 05/21/24 | | autistic hall toaster | 05/21/24 | | Provocative preventive strike | 05/21/24 | | costumed locus lettuce | 05/21/24 | | Provocative preventive strike | 05/21/24 | | Bateful parlour | 05/21/24 | | Provocative preventive strike | 05/21/24 | | disrespectful onyx cruise ship goal in life | 05/21/24 | | Provocative preventive strike | 05/21/24 | | disrespectful onyx cruise ship goal in life | 05/21/24 | | costumed locus lettuce | 05/21/24 | | disrespectful onyx cruise ship goal in life | 05/21/24 | | autistic hall toaster | 05/21/24 | | costumed locus lettuce | 05/21/24 | | costumed locus lettuce | 05/21/24 | | disrespectful onyx cruise ship goal in life | 05/21/24 | | costumed locus lettuce | 05/21/24 | | disrespectful onyx cruise ship goal in life | 05/21/24 | | arousing juggernaut lodge | 05/21/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 21st, 2024 3:54 PM Author: Provocative preventive strike
"You must remember, the People are not required to prove these offenses beyond a reasonable doubt; therefore, that reduces the need or the burden to define every term and every phrase," Merchan said, per Vance's blog. Merchan made the comment while discussing whether the defense could call an expert in campaign finance law.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/judge-merchan-tipped-his-hand-on-key-issue-attorney/ar-BB1mLWxJ
======
can someone walk me through this? if that's so, then what proof would Trump be on notice to provide to contradict something that the prosecution doesn't even have to define?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5531101&forum_id=2Reputation#47680538)
|
|
Date: May 21st, 2024 4:19 PM Author: costumed locus lettuce
yes. i posted the prosecutions motion on this when they were defending the indictment, but they literally argued, and the judge accepted, that defining what the second crime was would "limit their prosecution's strategies."
it makes sense when you consider that when these cases are brought it's obvious that the falsifier was up to something. if you had business records with material falsifications that could not have occurred by accident, it may be obvious you had criminal intent, even though i might not be able to prove how or who you were trying to defraud. for example, let's say that i falsified my assets in case i had an insurance claim, but i never made such a claim, then i would still be guilty here.
the only reason it's ridiculous here is because of how attenuated the case is at every level.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5531101&forum_id=2Reputation#47680604) |
Date: May 21st, 2024 4:51 PM Author: arousing juggernaut lodge
Law noob here. Do state court judges usually granted directed verdicts in criminal cases?
Does it make a difference if the judge is a Jew from New York and the defendant is Donald Trump?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5531101&forum_id=2Reputation#47680760) |
|
|