The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
im actually really into cybernetics rn
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 16th, 2026 5:48 PM Author: Metaphysical Animal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893801&forum_id=2Reputation#50071881) |
Date: August 16th, 2026 5:54 PM Author: The Penis (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893801&forum_id=2Reputation#50071889) |
|
Date: August 16th, 2026 5:59 PM Author: The Penis I'm really into it too right now, but I mostly am taking genuine cybernetic ideas like regulation, feedback, hierarchy, and recursive observation, then turning them into a very large metaphysical/psychological analogy for my Jungian framework. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893801&forum_id=2Reputation#50071896) |
 |
Date: August 16th, 2026 6:02 PM Author: Metaphysical Animal I think this is a worthwhile project, for what it is. Have you considered that these aspects of cybernetics may better describe the Abraxis framework, which is actually the improved version of Jungianism? Abraxis is a totality of the Jungian God of totality, making it a Super-Totality. That's a bigger totality, viz., a Totality of Totalities. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893801&forum_id=2Reputation#50071900) |
|
Date: August 16th, 2026 6:05 PM Author: The Penis Have actually already done this. For instance I believe that a God Image is not just a belief about reality. It is a regulator that organizes perception, affect, motivation, morality, and interpretation. The God Image functions like a cybernetic control architecture, not merely a proposition. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893801&forum_id=2Reputation#50071905) |
|
Date: August 16th, 2026 6:07 PM Author: Metaphysical Animal Right but im suggesting that you need to consider the God-image of the God-image itself (GIOGI, pronounced "Geo-G"), the Abraxis totality. Here the GIOGI influences the GI as a control architecture of the control arcitecture. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893801&forum_id=2Reputation#50071907) |
|
Date: August 16th, 2026 6:09 PM Author: The Penis I'm much more interested in how cybernetics is well-suited to Abraxas due to the fact that abraxas represents irreducible opposition. So the problem becomes one of regulating a system that contains permanently conflicting forces, rather than resolving those forces through theology. This makes my model much better than the so-called "redemptive systems". However I'll keep your suggestion in mind. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893801&forum_id=2Reputation#50071909) |
|
Date: August 16th, 2026 6:10 PM Author: Metaphysical Animal Nice response for what it is. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893801&forum_id=2Reputation#50071910) |
|
Date: August 16th, 2026 6:16 PM Author: The Penis Hey man I'm just telling you this as a clear-eyed dissident with no skin in the game. God images are literal cybernetic apex regulators. It's not like I even get rewarded for believing in this stuff. I am not chosen or superior. I am simply among the unusual people who cannot accept the consoling falsehoods ordinary people require. Abraxian metaphysics is a necessary regulatory solution for a certain type of people who experience rupture. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893801&forum_id=2Reputation#50071913) |
|
Date: August 16th, 2026 6:25 PM Author: Metaphysical Animal Ok my man well it sounds like you might want to look into complexity theory what your describing is really a cusp catastrophe not a rupture in the Godhead. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893801&forum_id=2Reputation#50071928) |
|
Date: August 16th, 2026 6:35 PM Author: The Penis Yeah good point. Say you represent the system's orientation toward the inherited redemptive worldview using classic cusp potential then there can be a bifurcation toward the non-redemptive Abraxian worldview. Then evil in the godhead can be represented as a frustrated system. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893801&forum_id=2Reputation#50071943) |
|
Date: August 16th, 2026 6:37 PM Author: Metaphysical Animal exactly and that's the hysteresis -- once you enter the post-redemptive worldview there's no way back. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893801&forum_id=2Reputation#50071949) |
|
Date: August 16th, 2026 6:39 PM Author: The Penis exactly the path-dependent system has reorganized into a new stable attractor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893801&forum_id=2Reputation#50071954) |
|
Date: August 16th, 2026 6:41 PM Author: Metaphysical Animal often called the Self-point or Ouroboric temenos, it's an impenetrable container of irreversible non-redemption (or "hell" for short). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893801&forum_id=2Reputation#50071957) |
|
Date: August 16th, 2026 6:37 PM Author: Monikor I passed this to Claude and he was stunned how far from the Truth you strayed, embarrassing (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893801&forum_id=2Reputation#50071950) |
|
Date: August 16th, 2026 6:40 PM Author: The Penis What does Claude say the Truth is for how the abraxas framework should be represented using complexity theory? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893801&forum_id=2Reputation#50071955) |
|
Date: August 16th, 2026 6:51 PM Author: Consuela Really enjoyed this thread and sub thread, ty (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893801&forum_id=2Reputation#50071971) |