The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
the "pedophilia" forcememe has spiraled completely out of control
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 19th, 2026 3:26 PM Author: simp crew soldier #1488 i'm not even sure if "pedophilia" is a real thing. in 99.9% of cases it appears to just be homosexuality. i am not at all convinced that there is a real group of people with the "sexual orientation" of being "attracted to" pre-pubescent, pre-sexually developed, pre-sexually dimorphic small children
in any case, if "pedophilia" ever was or is real, the public definition and perception of "pedophilia" has spiraled completely out of control into nonsensical fever dream delusion. no one is a "pedophile" for having sex with teens or wanting to have sex with teens. now we have to listen to women call men "pedophiles" for being attracted to women under the age of 45, and endless "age gap" babble
i want to blame women for this, and i think it probably is mostly their fault, but there are a *shocking* number of "men" who buy into the Pedophilia Cinematic Universe. it's just yet another opportunistic angle for unattractive beta men to attack sexually successful attractive men, to try to eliminate them as sexual competitors, and to soothe their own lifelong butthurt seething about being inferior unattractive losers
obviously the "epstein" saga has sent this shit into turbo overdrive, but it was already totally ridiculous before it. it's been happening for a long time now, basically my entire adult life. and it just keeps getting worse and worse |
Date: February 19th, 2026 3:29 PM Author: Candy Ride Hello fellow Greerhead.
Beaners and Africans do have sex with kids. Probably Moslems and Jews too. There are some white pedos too, but the current pedo movement is way overblown. |
 |
Date: February 19th, 2026 3:38 PM Author: simp crew soldier #1488 but are they "pedophiles?"
for sure, people do occasionally have (inappropriate) sexual relations with children, especially nons (ESPECIALLY beaners). but for example, all of the spics who get nailed for molesting their nieces aren't "pedophiles." they have sexual relations with adult women too. they're just dumb animals who have a sudden sexual urge that they can't control, and not enough executive function to prevent themselves from fingering their 11 year old beaner niece
i do think there is some tiny number of Actual Pedophiles who exist. but it's a really, really, really tiny number of people |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 3:41 PM Author: Darnell trump and bros should argue they're ephebophiles then (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49680819) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:51 PM Author: sealclubber In research environments, specific terms are used for chronophilias: for instance, ephebophilia to refer to the sexual preference for mid-to-late adolescents, hebephilia to refer to the sexual preference for earlier pubescent individuals, and pedophilia to refer to the primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children.[2][3] there is a more common term for ephebophiles--straight men |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 3:41 PM Author: Candy Ride Is a person who has sex with kids not a pedophile because they have also had sex with adults? I don't think that is a complete defense. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49680821) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 3:44 PM Author: simp crew soldier #1488 obviously not. a bird is not a fish because it dove into the water and swam around for a bit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49680828) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 3:31 PM Author: 1999 people are talking about "iq gaps" now too (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49680786) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:28 PM Author: simp crew soldier #1488 lmao (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49680938) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 3:36 PM Author: Darnell you're acting like teen pussy is no big deal but it's clearly verbotten. why? some of the richest and most powerful people in the world illicitly acquired it. in exchange, they pledged billions or dollars and favors to jewish puppet-masters.
if it were easily available and acceptable, all these doods would have all the teen pussy they wanted and they wouldn't have to sacrifice everything |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:52 PM Author: sealclubber wrong. these men got teens who were pretty ready willing able secretive non-related affordable |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 3:46 PM Author: .,.,.,.,,,,.,,.,.,.,...,,..,, Its as bad as russiagate , george floyd and ofher hysterias and moral panics (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49680835) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 3:56 PM Author: Long PlayroomPoon Clown Conniption ( ) Sure SP, whatever you say (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49680853) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:30 PM Author: OYT and the Indie Reprieve ( ) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49680940) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:32 PM Author: Consuela op = goy retardstar = pedophile (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49680945) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:33 PM Author: Like Clavicular but maxing annoying screeds (gunneratttt) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49680946) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:36 PM Author: Hallandale based jewish mafia people say extremely weird stuff on this forum (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49680955) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:38 PM Author: Consuela goy retardstar expressed a month ago his extreme surprise that people sometimes said things they didn't mean
he has debilitating autism to such a degree he belongs in an institution imo |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:41 PM Author: Like Clavicular but maxing annoying screeds (gunneratttt) pot v. kettle (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49680969) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:42 PM Author: Consuela (pedo-defender zonked out on coke, adderall, wellbutrin and xanax) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49680971) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:48 PM Author: Like Clavicular but maxing annoying screeds (gunneratttt) bro you have admitted being autistic and are broadly recognized as one of the more insane people here. its wild you're throwing stones here. goy superstar isnt a paragon of mental health but there are zero people here that would put him in the nuthouse over you. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49680982) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:50 PM Author: simp crew soldier #1488 lol who is Being Mean to me? whoever it is i have their posts blocked so i can't see it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49680986) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:57 PM Author: Like Clavicular but maxing annoying screeds (gunneratttt) try to guess! ill reveal after. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681008) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:02 PM Author: simp crew soldier #1488 probably consuela. i don't think anyone else here dislikes me enough to insist that i be institutionalized for the Crime of uh, idk, not simping or something (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681020) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:07 PM Author: Like Clavicular but maxing annoying screeds (gunneratttt) CORRECTAMUNDO!
although it's about your debilitating autism, which coming from the guy who spends all day writing about his jungian journey to uncover the grand central bank illuminati is ljfl.
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:38 PM Author: Consuela
goy retardstar expressed a month ago his extreme surprise that people sometimes said things they didn't mean he has debilitating autism to such a degree he belongs in an institution imo
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2#49680960) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:17 PM Author: simp crew soldier #1488 he really, really latched onto that particular post for some reason. i made an observation about how most people very often don't actually mean what they say in conversation, and are really just saying words to make conversation and engage in the social lubrication that's so important to us
i think he misunderstood it to mean that i was talking about all metaphorical language in general, which is a completely different thing, and something that regular people barely ever engage in |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:23 PM Author: Like Clavicular but maxing annoying screeds (gunneratttt) he's a kike sophist. he's also itt sperging about me being a pedo-lover (despite the fact i'm arguing against you and taking an anti-pedo position itt). he doesn't care about being right, he cares about "winning" an argument in his mind, and he's capable of repeating the same sophistries for years to feel that way. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681051) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:39 PM Author: simp crew soldier #1488 lol jfc
yeah i just can't stand that guy's lying. the arguing is whatever, i mean me and you are arguing in this thread right now kind of pointlessly, and i don't mind that. but the bad faith lying and dishonesty is just sooo obnoxious man i can't stand it |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:46 PM Author: Like Clavicular but maxing annoying screeds (gunneratttt) same. i mean, one of the things i like about online and xoxo at its best is a good faith discussion. i want to understand other POVs, that's not pointless to me even if no one's mind is changed.
lying to "win" an argument is so fucking bitchmade. it's pathetic when people do it irl, but it's especially pathetic in anonymous screenworld. imagine caring so much about what other anonymous poasters think that you're willing to lie to earn their approval. GAY! |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:18 PM Author: faggy vibes (🧐) u are the Same Person and this is why u hate each other it's painfully obvious (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681039) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:51 PM Author: Consuela i have not admitted being autistic - i've been accused of being schizo here. autism and schizo are opposite spectrum conditions, so which is it? you are BFF's with frivolous litigious shakedown scam artist brown child trans groomers and defend child sex transers like EPAH. you may be more functional than many posters but you're probably the craziest poster here (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49680989) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:51 PM Author: a rich inner world (luis) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49680988) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:57 PM Author: faggy vibes (🧐) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681010) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:40 PM Author: Like Clavicular but maxing annoying screeds (gunneratttt) obviously pedophiles are empirically real.
obviously it's a real condition since pedophiles are high recidivist. plus no normal person finds children attractive, and the thought of it inspires murderous rage in most people (women aren't the primary driver, men are, which is why chomos are brutally condemned even by other violent amoral men in prison.)
and yes, obviously there's a signant difference between fucking a 17 and a 7 year old. but the reason people are squeamish to admit this is because of poasts like this -- no one wants to be in the same camp as PEDOS =/= REAL. |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:47 PM Author: simp crew soldier #1488 how is it "obvious" that pedophiles are "empirically real?"
i'm not trying to give you a hard time here. really, i just don't see how this is obvious at all. there's no reason to think that there is anything more than some miniscule amount of humans who are exclusively sexually attracted to small children who have not developed sexual dimorphism yet. it doesn't make any sense.
like i said above, i agree that there's some tiny number of people like this. but this number is seriously fucking tiny, like maybe 1 in 100k? totally inconsequential and not worthy of a normal person's attention. unless, of course, that "normal person" has an agenda that would benefit from this "pedophilia" fiction |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:54 PM Author: a rich inner world (luis) It’s significantly higher than 1 in 100k. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681000) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:55 PM Author: Like Clavicular but maxing annoying screeds (gunneratttt) because of the number of people convicted of fucking children with conclusive evidence?
i agree with you that the pedo hystetia, especially with epstein, is overblown. but it's far more common than 1 in 100k.
also pedo doesnt mean exclusively attracted to kids any more than homosexuality meaning exclusively attracted to the same sex. it's a hard knot to unwind since who knows how many fags and pedos aren't that attracted to women but can get it up to fuck them and pass as normal. both things are abberant that they should be thought of as a binary "are you attracted yes or no" rather than exclusively attracted. if you get horny thinking about a seven year old you're a pedo even if you're horny for adults too. |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:59 PM Author: simp crew soldier #1488 "also pedo doesnt mean exclusively attracted to kids any more than homosexuality meaning exclusively attracted to the same sex"
yes it does. that's literally what it means. that's the whole point i'm making with this thread lol
i think this misunderstanding, which not only you but multiple other people in thread have, is probably part of the reason why this goofy hysteria got so bad. i imagine that if even people on xo believe this, who for all their faults are definitely much smarter than regular people, normies probably all have this same misunderstanding |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:01 PM Author: a rich inner world (luis) Why should it matter whether someone is exclusively attracted to kids or is just a deviant who rapes kids AND fucks adults? Both are equally dangerous (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681016) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:11 PM Author: simp crew soldier #1488 this is a good and important question that i'm surprised nobody asked yet
you can't let people go around calling people "pedophiles" who aren't actually pedophiles (people who are exclusively sexually attracted to small children), or else you end up with the condition of our society right now: a "slippery slope" of people slowly expanding the definition of "pedophilia" to "any sexual activity that hurts unattractive people's feelings, especially unattractive women"
another contemporary example of this is "racism." because people didn't speak up against all of the cynical self-interested people lying about "racism" over the years, "racist/racism" now means absolutely nothing except "some person/action that i don't like." now when someone is labeled a "racist," nobody has any idea if they're actually racist or not. just like when everyone who has sex with women under 45 is a "pedophile," nobody has any idea if a "pedophile" is actually dangerous around their children or not |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:17 PM Author: Like Clavicular but maxing annoying screeds (gunneratttt) you've completely dodged the question. perhaps unintentionally.
what is the significance of EXCLUSIVE to you? this is like saying someone who committed crimes but follows the law sometimes a criminal dilutes the word.
also you're just objectively wrong in how it's defined. where are you even getting that anyone, anywhere defines pedophile as EXCLUSIVELY attracted to children?
https://www.msdmanuals.com/professional/psychiatric-disorders/paraphilias-and-paraphilic-disorders/pedophilic-disorder |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:26 PM Author: simp crew soldier #1488 in your example, substitute the word 'psychopath' for 'criminal.' you can use 'psychopathic criminal' instead of 'psychopath' too - in fact that's probably more precise
these terms and labels are useful and good because they describe an individual in a way that allows others to model them correctly and predict their future actions. when you stop using the terms and labels honestly and correctly, they lose their predictive power, and thus lose their value and utility
someone who is otherwise a normally sexually functioning individual, who has poor self control and so has done sexually illegal things in the past, is vastly less dangerous than a real pedophile who is exclusively attracted to small children and structures their entire life in a way that will give them sexual access to small children. in the same way that a criminal psychopath who is incapable of empathy is much, much more dangerous than someone who is otherwise a pretty normal citizen but committed an opportunistic crime or two |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:31 PM Author: Like Clavicular but maxing annoying screeds (gunneratttt) psychopaths aren't exclusively existing in in a deregulated state bro. psychopaths can experience long periods of lucidity.
again, no one defines pedophile as EXCLUSIVELY attracted to children, it means ATTRACTED TO CHILDREN. i just cited something. you can't just pound your fist on the table and say "THIS IS WHAT THE WORD MEANS!" |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:43 PM Author: simp crew soldier #1488 man cmon, did you even read your own link? i burst out laughing as soon as i opened it. it's totally ridiculous, lol. just made up self-serving garbage that has nothing to do with actual human cognition or biology
i don't actually understand what you are trying to say in your first paragraph. psychopaths are just psychopaths. they don't have "periods of lucidity" idk what you're trying to say. they're psychopaths. they have zero capacity for empathy and love for other human beings. they are constantly, *constantly* committing anti-social acts, because they have zero biological programming or capability to be socialized. this is why they are particularly dangerous and undesirable compared to non-psychopaths who commit crimes of opportunity or passion |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:51 PM Author: Like Clavicular but maxing annoying screeds (gunneratttt) yes they do! you have no basis for your definition of pedo, it's prevalence, or the definition of psychopath beyond your own imagination! otherwise, cite something. i hate to be that "SOURCE?!" guy but we're arguing about an objective fact like what a word means and if clinical definition is laughable then we're at an impasse.
i'm arguing what the world understands pedophile to mean. you're arguing about what goy superstar wants it to mean and then getting mad that that definition is being diluted by that actual clinical definition. WHAT?! |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:01 PM Author: Like Clavicular but maxing annoying screeds (gunneratttt) what is the significance of the distinction between someone who is exclusively attracted to children and someone who is attracted to children and other things to you? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681017) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:20 PM Author: content creation delta force (Δ) I think he's trying to say there are Mostly Peaceful Rapists (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681044) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:23 PM Author: content creation delta force (Δ) gunneratttt is correct here. Two things can be true, Society at large makes an overblown deal about post-pubescent teenage girls' ability to legally consent. But also real chomos do exist. Cops bust people all the time for unspeakable crimes against young children and shit. How is this even debatable? It's two separate things. 14 and 7 are two completely different things and they both happen.
I have long argued that AOC laws should still be in place but renamed from statutory rape to corrupting the youth and abuse of power. I wouldn't want my teen dotter running off with Jamal either. But yeah it's not rape if it's a biological adult and it's consentual. |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:56 PM Author: Darnell why are you stupidly confusing "rare" for "not real"?
because you have a shitty, weak argument? |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:01 PM Author: White wife, no reaction. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681015) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:46 PM Author: norwood ultra there are a lot of different phenomena of various badness grouped together as "pedophilia"
- real sickos who have sex with prepubescent children - men who have sex with pubescent girls or post-pubescent underage girls as compensation for their own stunted sexual-social development (trying to belatedly "complete" their own puberty from a social perspective) - men who have sex with pubescent girls, post-pubescent underage girls or simply younger women because they want to exercise power in the relationship and find it easier to do so with an age gap - men who have sex with post-pubescent underage girls or younger women because they are attracted to sexually mature youthfulness |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:50 PM Author: simp crew soldier #1488 right, it's now just a catch-all category for 'all men who have sexual preferences that aren't unattractive and/or older women'
it's just another dishonest, cynical tool for unattractive sexually dysfunctional people to attack attractive, normal, heterosexual people and sexuality |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:51 PM Author: norwood ultra i don't agree with that. i think a lot of the men i described are engaged in antisocial conduct to varying degrees, but i do acknowledge that the first group is the worst (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49680990) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 4:54 PM Author: simp crew soldier #1488 no offense man, but it is *extremely* sus to say that men who want to exercise power in a heterosexual relationship (what women want), and men who have sex with young women because they are attracted to "sexually mature youthfulness" (this is just normal, healthy heterosexuality) are engaging in "anti-social conduct" (your words)
this is the exact kind of rhetoric and attitude that i'm bashing in this thread |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:16 PM Author: norwood ultra men who enjoy habitually exploiting younger women greatly overstate how "natural" their preference is (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681035) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:19 PM Author: simp crew soldier #1488 yeah ok this is just unironic simp garbage
attractive young women are *literally* the most powerful group of people in the entire world, and it's not even fucking close. nobody is "exploiting" them nigga. go back to reddit |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:20 PM Author: norwood ultra this is just self serving incel garbage (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681047) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:30 PM Author: content creation delta force (Δ) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681061) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:31 PM Author: content creation delta force (Δ) They're not actually powerful. No financial stability, social network, no career. They've been cared for by their parents their whole lives. How are they powerful? They're vulnerable like all young adults are. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681065) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:35 PM Author: simp crew soldier #1488 oh my goddddd dude all memes aside maybe FLW actually is right about you guys (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681073) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:37 PM Author: content creation delta force (Δ) Describe the uhhh 'power' of a teenage girl please (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681075) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:40 PM Author: Darnell rofl at this limp dick incel faggotry
after you organically fuck a few young hot pussies, you realize they're all the same. only idiots lust after that forever. grow up |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:40 PM Author: Like Clavicular but maxing annoying screeds (gunneratttt) it is "natural" just like theft and murder is "natural." why is it so hard for some people to understand how dumb the "natural" argument is? if it was unnatural to do something we wouldn't need to have laws and taboos to prohibit it!
yeah, every healthy, hetero man who sees a 17 year old stunner at the beach experiences attraction. most don't act on it because we're not base animals and realize that it would be destructive to her and society if we did. the same reason i don't attack someone that pisses me off or steal from people who have things that i want. |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:45 PM Author: simp crew soldier #1488 equating normal, consensual heterosexual relations between two consenting, sexually mature individuals with theft and murder is jumping the shark. enough
ok guys i think we're done here |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:46 PM Author: ..,,....,,.,..,,..,,...,...,,....,..., Define acting on it. If you just mean hitting on them that's not remotely comparable (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681108) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:52 PM Author: bo nix lol come on man (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681120) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:29 PM Author: content creation delta force (Δ) It can be. Say Jamal is 30 and he meets two 15 year olds on social media. They run off with him and he forces them into prostitution. He gets caught but they refuse to testify because they 'love' him. Police find a video of sex with the minors. Do you want charges dropped because the sex was consentual or can you still prosecute based on the evidence for a statutory crime. I wouldn't call Jamal a pedophile but I would want him in jail for predatory behavior. Same with Epstein. He wasn't a pedophile but he was a predator who took advantage of women who came to him willingly. Not a pedo but still a sex criminal imo. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681058) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:38 PM Author: content creation delta force (Δ) I don't think goy superstar has considered for one minute the impact of changing the law. Not a scholar. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681082) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:00 PM Author: White wife, no reaction. I suggest reading a heterosexual pedophile's thoughts for an answer if it really matters to you, but it suffices to say that you're wrong. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681014) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:40 PM Author: simp crew soldier #1488 this is a good suggestion and i'd totally do it except it seems sketchy to search for that stuff Online (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681090) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:33 PM Author: bo nix there definitely are real "pedos" who molest little kids of both sexes that is what people meant when they used the term until very recently I agree it's been overused to the point of ridiculousness and stupidity |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:37 PM Author: content creation delta force (Δ) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681081) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 5:48 PM Author: Consuela <chews popcorn as the retard autist and the pedo-enabler gakked up on 12 substances pedo-squabble> (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5836419&forum_id=2betting#49681115) |