The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| Chrome Racy Police Squad Box Office | 01/06/26 | | vigorous unholy nowag | 01/06/26 | | vibrant stock car area | 01/06/26 | | vigorous unholy nowag | 01/06/26 | | vibrant stock car area | 01/06/26 | | vigorous unholy nowag | 01/06/26 | | Chrome Racy Police Squad Box Office | 01/06/26 | | vigorous unholy nowag | 01/06/26 | | Chrome Racy Police Squad Box Office | 01/06/26 | | Federal mental disorder boltzmann | 01/07/26 | | swashbuckling degenerate | 01/06/26 | | Pearly supple boiling water sneaky criminal | 01/06/26 | | vibrant stock car area | 01/06/26 | | Splenetic principal's office weed whacker | 01/06/26 | | vibrant stock car area | 01/06/26 | | Drab Halford | 01/06/26 | | amethyst meetinghouse | 01/06/26 | | adventurous theatre | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: vigorous unholy nowag
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2betting#49568134) |
|
|