\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Ecclesiastes seems to inhabit phenomenologically the crucifixion of opposites

...
Consuela
  07/03/26
isnt it just about a depressed jew
dat rigor
  07/03/26
He’s depressed because everything is Vanity, ephemeral...
Consuela
  07/03/26
isn't that lack "fulfilled" later on with the dead...
dat rigor
  07/03/26
Bartholomew in his academic exegesis of Ecclesiastes argues ...
Consuela
  07/03/26
i think every christian in history thinks jesus was the Chri...
dat rigor
  07/03/26
Sure, my point is that it’s hard to read Ecclesiastes ...
Consuela
  07/03/26
that begs the question of whether you need to read it that w...
dat rigor
  07/03/26
No one else seems to have read it that way, so I think it&rs...
Consuela
  07/03/26
There is nothing new under the sun
John Robert's wigger drug addict son
  07/03/26
...
Consuela
  07/03/26
You should get a ThM
John Robert's wigger drug addict son
  07/03/26
...
dat rigor
  07/03/26
For what purpose? I don’t care to be a professor or a...
Consuela
  07/03/26
Because you have no idea what you’re talking about
John Robert's wigger drug addict son
  07/03/26
you're welcome to offer your interpretation, champ
Consuela
  07/03/26
im not following here. what is your interpretation?
dat rigor
  07/03/26
thesis of the post will be roughly as follows, although i ha...
Consuela
  07/03/26
this seems like the whole "the only thing that doesn't ...
dat rigor
  07/03/26
abraxas is the term for a god image containing both good and...
Consuela
  07/03/26
isn't "god image" just whatever a person values mo...
dat rigor
  07/03/26
as limited, finite beings, we cannot perceive what "god...
Consuela
  07/03/26
sounds like some kind of psychologized dispensationalism. ...
dat rigor
  07/03/26
no. my argument is that this reality is structured as pairs...
Consuela
  07/03/26
yeah but again, this is gay metaphysics, social critique, an...
dat rigor
  07/03/26
it is not a moral endorsement of evil, for structural reason...
Consuela
  07/03/26
ok so you're trying to make a religion. i guess that makes s...
dat rigor
  07/03/26
i am not trying to make a religion, because living under tot...
Consuela
  07/03/26
yeah i mean call it whatever you want but i would call it fo...
dat rigor
  07/03/26
the very beginning of Kohelet in hebrew is quite literally a...
Ricky
  07/03/26
sounds like a fucking yugioh episode
dat rigor
  07/03/26
...
forum doesn?t work
  07/03/26
he refers to god only as "elohim" throughout, neve...
Consuela
  07/03/26
ein sof is not elohim, elohim is the demiurge aka metatron a...
Ricky
  07/03/26
If you have a shit life just stay in your lane my brothers, ...
sup killa
  07/03/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 4:39 PM
Author: Consuela



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977433)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 4:40 PM
Author: dat rigor

isnt it just about a depressed jew

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977438)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 4:42 PM
Author: Consuela

He’s depressed because everything is Vanity, ephemeral, nothing lasts

He spends the time in the text testing various containers - money, power, sex, etc - finding everything wanting

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977441)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 4:43 PM
Author: dat rigor

isn't that lack "fulfilled" later on with the dead, hanging jew

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977444)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 4:45 PM
Author: Consuela

Bartholomew in his academic exegesis of Ecclesiastes argues that, yes, but I see it as an offloading of the agony of the crucifixion of opposites

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977446)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 4:46 PM
Author: dat rigor

i think every christian in history thinks jesus was the Christ

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977447)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 4:47 PM
Author: Consuela

Sure, my point is that it’s hard to read Ecclesiastes for what it is when one thinks the problems it wrestles with in a very painful way have been superseded

But the problems it deals with are a constant part of being alive

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977449)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 4:48 PM
Author: dat rigor

that begs the question of whether you need to read it that way at all, or whether it's an inaccurate and misguided misanthropy

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977450)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 4:48 PM
Author: Consuela

No one else seems to have read it that way, so I think it’s a novel approach

I’ll be writing about it soon

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977451)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 4:51 PM
Author: John Robert's wigger drug addict son

There is nothing new under the sun

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977455)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 4:54 PM
Author: Consuela



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977461)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 4:56 PM
Author: John Robert's wigger drug addict son

You should get a ThM

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977465)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 4:56 PM
Author: dat rigor



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977467)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 4:57 PM
Author: Consuela

For what purpose? I don’t care to be a professor or academic, I don’t need the rubber stamp

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977468)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 5:01 PM
Author: John Robert's wigger drug addict son

Because you have no idea what you’re talking about

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977476)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 5:16 PM
Author: Consuela

you're welcome to offer your interpretation, champ

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977491)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 5:24 PM
Author: dat rigor

im not following here. what is your interpretation?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977497)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 5:29 PM
Author: Consuela

thesis of the post will be roughly as follows, although i have some more sources to read first

the oscillation in Ecclesiastes that has puzzled commentators from the rabbinic debates at Jamnia to Bartholomew’s modern analysis is the phenomenological record of someone performing the crucifixion of opposites under a god-image that contains evil but lacks the vocabulary to name what it contains. Each time Qohelet finds a provisional foothold (wisdom is better than folly, enjoyment is a gift, companionship has value) he immediately tests it against the structural reality he has observed and finds it insufficient. The foothold is real but it cannot hold the weight of a condition that admits no permanent resolution. Every available interpretive framework (orthodox Jewish, Christian, secular academic) requires the oscillation to resolve in a direction it never takes: the religious Jewish reader needs it to end in “fear God and keep the commandments", the Christian reader needs it to end in Christ, the secular pessimist reader needs it to be a cry of despair, the academic structuralist catalogs its polar opposites without asking what generates them, but none of these readings can sit still in the oscillation itself. The Abraxian framework can, because it has a name for the structural condition Qohelet is navigating without being able to name.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977500)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 6:34 PM
Author: dat rigor

this seems like the whole "the only thing that doesn't change is change itself" bit. I'm not sure im following what "abraxis" is. Is that like transgenderism?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977606)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 6:37 PM
Author: Consuela

abraxas is the term for a god image containing both good and evil, horrifying totality. jung articulated the concept in his seven sermons to the dead and the liber novus, although he ultimately backed away from it in favor of god evolving his consciousness over time through man

if of interest, see here:

https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-collapse-of-the-all-good-god

and here:

https://livingopposites.substack.com/p/the-formal-logic-of-the-crucifixion



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977613)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 6:38 PM
Author: dat rigor

isn't "god image" just whatever a person values most highly? On that reading, you're saying you value evil, which is morally repugnant position.

or are you making a different claim that "god" is an objective thing out there which just so happens to be good and evil.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977615)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 6:41 PM
Author: Consuela

as limited, finite beings, we cannot perceive what "god" is. we have an image of what he is which changes over time (and over aeons). during the piscean era the god image generally has been a god of all good, the "privatio boni", where evil was considered a deprivation of god

but the god image doesn't have to be a god figure, its the highest order belief that humans have - it could be capitalism, or communism, or other things. our highest order beliefs are a hinge proposition (wittgenstein term) which presupposes what our thoughts and perceptions even are

there is more about this here: https://livingopposites.substack.com/p/the-god-image-as-regulatory-architecture

for me, my core problem was that my god image - a god as all loving - did not match up with my perception of reality. with an updated god image containing totality, my perception of reality and my god image do no longer clash, which for me makes reality easier to inhabit (although it is still difficult)

this doesn't mean being evil or being a predator, there are structural reasons to avoid that which don't involve fear of punishment in the afterlife

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977619)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 6:47 PM
Author: dat rigor

sounds like some kind of psychologized dispensationalism.

but im not following. are you saying "god is evil" or that "my god image is evil."

i think you're saying "the world makes more sense to me if i believe god is evil." which is a weak claim. sense-making isn't a standard of truth afaict

if i had to put a read on this, i'd say you're making a social critique, wherein you don't think what other people call "evil" is really evil. So you construct this elaborate metaphysics to avoid having to hold the position that what you are and what you believe is heterodox.

it seems like the whole jung thing is a detour to justify this to yourself, and there is something more substantive ("evil" to others, but true to you) waiting to happen

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977626)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 6:51 PM
Author: Consuela

no. my argument is that this reality is structured as pairs of opposites, where nothing makes sense except in terms of its opposites - light vs darkness, good vs evil, matter vs spirituality, hot vs cold, up vs down, in vs out, materialism vs ascetic withdrawal, strength vs weakness, etc. there are an infinite number of such pairs. from my perspective, God must contain all pairs of opposites. what christianity does is deny the "evil" pole, which is then suppressed into the unconscious where it leaks out uncontrollably, including onto enemies

if or when one sees reality this way, then the "evil" of the world is not some monstrous denial or rejection of god, it is *contained within a god image of totality itself* - which in many ways is more horrifying than atheism or evil existing as simply free will

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977636)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 6:55 PM
Author: dat rigor

yeah but again, this is gay metaphysics, social critique, and a moral endorsement of evil. is the whole point you're trying to communicate, "wow im horrified here's why?" are you a performance artist? I don't get it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977648)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 7:00 PM
Author: Consuela

it is not a moral endorsement of evil, for structural reasons though. i'm not going to get into it here, this is already a substhread wasteland, but its addressed directly in part 2 of the collapse of the all good god post linked above

the point of an updated god image is it dramatically increases energy flow and efficiency for those whose god image and perception of reality are not synched. furthermore, as the world continues its descent into neoliberal feudalism hell - which will get much worse - more and more people will cross the threshold where their existing god image will be somatically pressured into duress. this is who the work is directed at

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977664)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 7:01 PM
Author: dat rigor

ok so you're trying to make a religion. i guess that makes sense. how do you support yourself?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977668)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 7:02 PM
Author: Consuela

i am not trying to make a religion, because living under totality prevents the egregore formation that religion requires

you've thrown out a lot of wrong suppositions about my perspective ITT instead of keeping an open mind and reading things

i support myself with money

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977673)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 7:04 PM
Author: dat rigor

yeah i mean call it whatever you want but i would call it founding a religion, or a philosophy cult or whatever. doesn't matter. im just wondering if you're making money from the religion or if the religion is a side project

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977680)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 5:39 PM
Author: Ricky

the very beginning of Kohelet in hebrew is quite literally a confirmation of the Demiurge or Firstborn Angel creating this realm

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977529)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 5:41 PM
Author: dat rigor

sounds like a fucking yugioh episode

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977530)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 5:43 PM
Author: forum doesn?t work



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977536)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 5:47 PM
Author: Consuela

he refers to god only as "elohim" throughout, never as "yahweh", because he is referring imo to ein sof, not a tribal lesser god

ecclesiastes is really quite subversive re: authority which is why they had to affix some lame trite conclusion on at the end, its a wonder that rabbinical authorities included it in the official corpus

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977547)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 5:58 PM
Author: Ricky

ein sof is not elohim, elohim is the demiurge aka metatron and samael (and host of other angels (fallen?) rephaim), havayah is the name of god closer to the ein sof

yahweh is somethign else entirely

he uses differnet names throughut it, i wrote this in taht other poast, the haval hevalim thing being teh 6 days of creation under the demiurge/elohim

he's lamenting how sps the elohim creation is

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977568)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 3rd, 2026 5:50 PM
Author: sup killa (πŸΎπŸ‘£)

If you have a shit life just stay in your lane my brothers, eat your fill, get loaded, sing and dance, YOLO.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879461&forum_id=2betting#49977556)