\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

im a 45 year old incel here are my thoughts on jordan peterson

...
dun partner kitchen
  01/10/26
subscribed
Mewling temple genital piercing
  01/10/26
...
Sick Talented Stead
  01/10/26
...
Mewling temple genital piercing
  01/10/26
The proposition that a modern recording device could capture...
dun partner kitchen
  01/10/26
incredible
Sick Talented Stead
  01/10/26
...
Mewling temple genital piercing
  01/11/26
...
Genius Theologian
  01/12/26
*does massive bong rip* dude, that's fucking....dude. yes...
Floppy whorehouse boiling water
  01/11/26
Stoners don't do theology
dun partner kitchen
  01/11/26
...
Floppy whorehouse boiling water
  01/10/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: January 10th, 2026 11:19 AM
Author: dun partner kitchen



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820371&forum_id=2betting#49578600)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 10th, 2026 11:21 AM
Author: Mewling temple genital piercing

subscribed

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820371&forum_id=2betting#49578602)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 10th, 2026 11:22 AM
Author: Sick Talented Stead



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820371&forum_id=2betting#49578603)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 10th, 2026 8:17 PM
Author: Mewling temple genital piercing



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820371&forum_id=2betting#49579731)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 10th, 2026 8:24 PM
Author: dun partner kitchen

The proposition that a modern recording device could capture the Resurrection of Christ represents a fundamental category error, conflating materialist empiricism with transcendental ontology. Jordan Peterson’s recent assertion that a video camera would have recorded a physical figure exiting the tomb attempts to bridge the gap between historical fact and psychological archetype, yet it fails to account for the specific nature of the resurrected body as described in the Pauline tradition. According to the theology of David Bentley Hart and the exegesis of 1 Corinthians 15, the Resurrection does not involve the resuscitation of a sōma psychikon (animal/soulish body) but the manifestation of a sōma pneumatikon (spiritual body). This distinction is critical: the spiritual body is not merely “flesh and blood” restored to life, but a transfigured state of being that occupies a different ontological plane. A digital sensor, calibrated strictly to record the behavior of photons within three-dimensional space-time, would be functionally incapable of detecting a reality that transcends the materialist constraints of “flesh and blood.”

Furthermore, the Resurrection is more accurately understood as an objective “trigger” for a latent human potential rather than a unique biological anomaly. The “Third Man” phenomenon—a perceived transcendental presence often reported in extreme “limit experiences”—suggests the existence of an objective, eternal field of reality that precedes the historical Incarnation. In this framework, the Logos is an ever-present transcendental structure, and the figure of Christ serves as the aparchē, or “first fruits.” This implies that Jesus of Nazareth was the first to achieve the state of teleios—a Greek term denoting maturity or the fulfillment of a telos—thereby merging human consciousness with the transcendental. Consequently, the Resurrection is not an isolated miracle to be observed by a lens, but the historical “breaking through” of a universal state of being that remains a potentiality for all of humanity.

Viewing the Resurrection through the lens of a “perfect man” narrative risks the cultivation of a toxic cult of personality, wherein an ontological breakthrough is reduced to a moralistic gold medal. If perfection is understood correctly as spiritual maturity and the integration of the human with the Logos, then this state cannot be exclusive to a single historical identity. To claim that a camera could record this event is to make an unfalsifiable empirical claim that diminishes the radical nature of the sōma pneumatikon. The event remains objective and “physical” in a higher sense, yet it is inherently non-recordable by scientific instruments, as it represents the point where the material world is subsumed by a more dense, transcendental reality. The “Third Man” in the tomb is thus the manifestation of a universal maturity that invites a species-wide evolution, rather than a mere resuscitation to be archived on a digital drive.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820371&forum_id=2betting#49579738)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 10th, 2026 9:08 PM
Author: Sick Talented Stead

incredible

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820371&forum_id=2betting#49579822)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2026 9:54 AM
Author: Mewling temple genital piercing



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820371&forum_id=2betting#49580519)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 12th, 2026 7:45 PM
Author: Genius Theologian



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820371&forum_id=2betting#49584675)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2026 8:28 AM
Author: Floppy whorehouse boiling water

*does massive bong rip*

dude, that's fucking....dude. yes!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820371&forum_id=2betting#49580439)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 11th, 2026 9:39 AM
Author: dun partner kitchen

Stoners don't do theology

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820371&forum_id=2betting#49580510)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 10th, 2026 11:23 AM
Author: Floppy whorehouse boiling water



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820371&forum_id=2betting#49578605)