What better evidence of adversity is there other than the demonstrated performance of a student on the SAT? Given that we can expect greater adversity to causally detract from a student's SAT score, that very score is itself a measure of adversity. The average SAT score is about 1060. The adversity score will be 1060 - X, where X is the student's SAT score. Someone who scores an 860 therefore would have a 200 point adversity score, whereas someone who scores a 1260 should have a -200 adversity score. The adversity score is of course separate from the actual SAT score - colleges will have the option of receiving a combined SAT and adversity score, or can view them separately. Test-takers, however, will only receive the combined score.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4264358&forum_id=2betting#38254248)

In addition, this measure is truly color-blind and would not run afoul of the Constitution.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4264358&forum_id=2betting#38254780)

honestly as much as i hate shitlibs, i have an unsettling feeling that in the future the most powerful political enemies who come after them will be utterly lacking in anything resembling human empathy to the point that i will wish i was dealing with SJWs instead of them

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4264358&forum_id=2betting#38258064)