Jezebel: The End of White Men is Good for White Men
| Histrionic confused cruise ship | 11/13/12 | | electric halford | 11/13/12 | | bipolar saffron sanctuary therapy | 11/13/12 | | stimulating keepsake machete piazza | 11/13/12 | | bipolar saffron sanctuary therapy | 11/13/12 | | buff razzmatazz theater | 11/13/12 | | stimulating keepsake machete piazza | 11/13/12 | | buff razzmatazz theater | 11/13/12 | | stimulating keepsake machete piazza | 11/13/12 | | buff razzmatazz theater | 11/13/12 | | spectacular bull headed parlor | 11/13/12 | | buff razzmatazz theater | 11/13/12 | | spectacular bull headed parlor | 11/13/12 | | buff razzmatazz theater | 11/13/12 | | spectacular bull headed parlor | 11/13/12 | | buff razzmatazz theater | 11/13/12 | | spectacular bull headed parlor | 11/13/12 | | buff razzmatazz theater | 11/13/12 | | spectacular bull headed parlor | 11/13/12 | | buff razzmatazz theater | 11/13/12 | | glassy affirmative action | 11/13/12 | | Ultramarine Home | 11/13/12 | | glassy affirmative action | 11/13/12 | | buff razzmatazz theater | 11/13/12 | | stimulating keepsake machete piazza | 11/13/12 | | glassy affirmative action | 11/13/12 | | buff razzmatazz theater | 11/13/12 | | Burgundy stubborn space generalized bond | 11/13/12 | | buff razzmatazz theater | 11/13/12 | | Shimmering crackhouse quadroon | 10/16/23 | | concupiscible theater stage | 10/16/23 | | concupiscible theater stage | 10/16/23 | | concupiscible theater stage | 04/29/24 | | concupiscible theater stage | 04/29/24 | | Laughsome Self-absorbed Useless Brakes Foreskin | 10/16/23 | | cowardly chapel nibblets | 10/16/23 | | Slap-happy white hominid orchestra pit | 10/16/23 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 13th, 2012 5:35 PM Author: Histrionic confused cruise ship
http://jezebel.com/5960099/why-the-end-of-white-men-is-good-for-actually-good-for-white-men
Its a pretty stupid article, but whats more entertaining is the fact that the editors at Gawker Inc. decided to link to the story in Deadspin (the sports arm) no doubt with the sole purpose of inflaming the white males who populate that site (they usually don't cross link stories unless there is an obviously shared interest-Hint: there isn't one here). Now there is a war in comment section filled with much lulz.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2113167&forum_id=2Reputation#22036683) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2012 7:17 PM Author: buff razzmatazz theater
dude, you have very little idea how online advertising works.
theyre running adwords. google pays em for impressions and clicks, whichever would earn the site more.
very few advertiser actually micromanage down to the specific site level, only categories.
and i can assure you jezebel earns a very comfortable amount of revenue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2113167&forum_id=2Reputation#22037481) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2012 7:29 PM Author: buff razzmatazz theater
advertisers dont bid on specific sites, they bid on keywords.
so if advertiser x bids on "female hypergamy", it doesnt matter if that keyword appears on jezebel or xo (provided xo wasnt blacklisted), bid will be the same.
there is a way to block certain sites from running your ads on, but i guaranteed you close to 0 advertisers interested in that demographic (which btw is very profitable) block jezebel.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2113167&forum_id=2Reputation#22037557) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2012 7:25 PM Author: buff razzmatazz theater
there are some that will even give you 100% (these will be monthly billed subscriptions, some will give you 100% of first month, and then a sizeable % for subsequent months).
bigtime publishing powerhouses only do impressions, cuz they have leverage.
the pay per sale model is for small time fish. mommy blogs and shit will do that, because they dont have massive impressions #'s, but they have very targetted traffic.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2113167&forum_id=2Reputation#22037539) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2012 7:47 PM Author: buff razzmatazz theater
i dunno, i dont care much.
i never particularly liked gawker (the site itself). i read alot of techcrunch, and if they also owned jezebel i dont think id care much.
i could see how cross pollination could get annoying though.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2113167&forum_id=2Reputation#22037691) |
|
|