The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Good morning sons of scholarship!!!!!
| Bat Shit Crazy Casino Psychic | 09/10/13 |
| Awkward ticket booth love of her life | 09/10/13 |
| Infuriating stag film | 09/10/13 |
| cerebral zombie-like patrolman party of the first part | 09/10/13 |
| gold offensive kitty cat | 09/11/13 |
| french vibrant business firm | 09/11/13 |
| pungent indian lodge | 09/11/13 |
| Titillating nofapping gas station | 05/23/19 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 10th, 2013 5:20 AM Author: Bat Shit Crazy Casino Psychic Today we will bake those treats!
Today we will suck on the meats!
Today we will cherish our scholarly feats!
Think I might need mental help bros. |
Date: September 10th, 2013 5:22 AM Author: Awkward ticket booth love of her life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2358973&forum_id=2#24025254) |
|
Date: September 10th, 2013 5:34 AM Author: Infuriating stag film (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2358973&forum_id=2#24025259) |
|
Date: September 10th, 2013 6:33 AM Author: cerebral zombie-like patrolman party of the first part (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2358973&forum_id=2#24025275) |
|
Date: September 11th, 2013 7:14 AM Author: gold offensive kitty cat (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2358973&forum_id=2#24031871) |
|
Date: September 11th, 2013 7:18 AM Author: french vibrant business firm (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2358973&forum_id=2#24031875) |
|
Date: September 11th, 2013 9:19 AM Author: pungent indian lodge The Methodology of Legal Philosophy
Alex Langlinais
University of Chicago
Brian Leiter
University of Chicago
September 6, 2013
H. Cappelen, T. Gendler, & J. Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology, Forthcoming U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 407
Abstract: This is the revised and penultimate version of this paper. The essay surveys issues about philosophical methodology as they arise in general jurisprudence. Certainly in the Anglophone world and increasingly outside it, H.L.A. Hart’s 1961 book The Concept of Law has dominated the discussion. Unsurprisingly, then, methodological debates typically scrutinize either one of two (related) methodological claims in Hart’s classic work. The first is that his theory is both general and descriptive (Hart 1994: 239). The second is that his theory is an exercise in both linguistic analysis and descriptive sociology (Hart 1994: vi). We explicate both ideas, arguing, in particular, that (1) Hart aims to give an essentialist analysis of law and legal systems (a point clearest in those who follow him like J. Raz, J. Dickson and [though less of a follower] S. Shapiro), and (2) we can make sense of the linking of linguistic (and conceptual) analysis and descriptive sociology if we understand "law" as a constructed bit of "social reality" in something like John Searle's sense. The ensuing methodological debates in legal philosophy can then be understood as arguing against either linguistic or conceptual analysis (naturalists like B. Leiter), or against the idea of a purely descriptive jurisprudence (in different ways, J. Finnis, S. Perry, M. Murphy, L. Murphy, R. Dworkin).
Number of Pages in PDF File: 26
Keywords: H.L.A. Hart, methodology, descriptive jurisprudence, conceptual analysis, John Searle, legal philosophy, general jurisprudence Accepted Paper Series
|
|
Date: May 23rd, 2019 9:56 PM Author: Titillating nofapping gas station (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2358973&forum_id=2#38280442) |