\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Libs, help me understand how anti-AA is anti-minority

The purpose of AA is to further the educational benefits of ...
hot stock car locus
  04/22/14
Bc AA like all other lib priorities, is premised on lib bull...
Nudist Orchestra Pit Elastic Band
  04/22/14
180
beady-eyed preventive strike
  04/23/14
because the "diversity" rationale is bullshit that...
burgundy mewling double fault
  04/23/14
...
Amber 180 site
  04/23/14
...
hot stock car locus
  04/22/14
libs also have dat critical | mass | argument
Impressive laughsome main people
  04/24/14
...
Electric chocolate school karate
  04/24/14


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: April 22nd, 2014 11:37 PM
Author: hot stock car locus

The purpose of AA is to further the educational benefits of diversity. This benefit inures to EVERYONE, INCLUDING WHITE PEOPLE at a university. So when the majority votes to ban AA, they are doing so after taking into account the loss of educational benefits from diversity. Banning AA doesn't hurt minorities any more than it hurts white people, under SCOTUS's current view of AA. To the extent that blacks feel they lose anything else, those other things are not constitutionally legitimate reasons to have AA.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2549665&forum_id=2#25429578)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 22nd, 2014 11:43 PM
Author: Nudist Orchestra Pit Elastic Band

Bc AA like all other lib priorities, is premised on lib bullshit

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2549665&forum_id=2#25429607)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 23rd, 2014 1:03 AM
Author: beady-eyed preventive strike

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2549665&forum_id=2#25429935)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 23rd, 2014 12:32 AM
Author: burgundy mewling double fault

because the "diversity" rationale is bullshit that literally nobody with a two working brain cells believe. People either believe AA should be banned or believe it's worthwhile to right past wrongs and/or make outcomes more even.

If people actually thought diversity was worth 15% of the class having a test scores 1.5 STDEV below the median, they'd do something to actually promote diversity on campus. There are countless studies about how to do this (small residential colleges, etc.). But nobody does any of that who wasn't already doing it, because nobody truly believes in the diversity zeitgeist.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2549665&forum_id=2#25429823)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 23rd, 2014 8:26 AM
Author: Amber 180 site



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2549665&forum_id=2#25431013)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 22nd, 2014 11:46 PM
Author: hot stock car locus



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2549665&forum_id=2#25429620)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 24th, 2014 12:47 AM
Author: Impressive laughsome main people

libs also have dat critical | mass | argument

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2549665&forum_id=2#25436536)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 24th, 2014 12:53 PM
Author: Electric chocolate school karate



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2549665&forum_id=2#25438534)