The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Consider the wisdom saying this at OCI
| cordovan lascivious area | 07/29/14 |
| razzle-dazzle cream market mexican | 07/29/14 |
| ruddy fighting sound barrier | 07/29/14 |
| cordovan lascivious area | 07/29/14 |
| ruddy fighting sound barrier | 07/29/14 |
| green stirring lettuce pervert | 07/29/14 |
| big slimy shrine stain | 07/29/14 |
| cordovan lascivious area | 07/29/14 |
| umber coiffed stock car | 07/29/14 |
| titillating up-to-no-good clown | 07/29/14 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 29th, 2014 9:22 PM Author: cordovan lascivious area That I want to be GC for a startup one day. Does that show ballsy ambition or that I'm admitting I'm not gunning for partner. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2631406&forum_id=2#26025051) |
Date: July 29th, 2014 9:30 PM Author: razzle-dazzle cream market mexican startups don't pay biglaw bills. say GC of F100 and you can still be valuable to the firm (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2631406&forum_id=2#26025106) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2014 9:31 PM Author: ruddy fighting sound barrier http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2630360&forum_id=2#26021215
Given that you've never practiced law a day in your life, you should not say that. Just say you are leaning to corp or lit (or reg or tax, etc.) and why you are leaning that way. |
 |
Date: July 29th, 2014 9:37 PM Author: cordovan lascivious area I have a biotech background, so I'm leaning IP and this is less crazy than the normal 1L.
You're right though, in that I have no real idea of what that entails. But that is true for practicing anything. |
|
Date: July 29th, 2014 9:41 PM Author: ruddy fighting sound barrier Yea for what it's worth I don't think it would really matter either way if you said it. If you def do want to do that then go ahead. Students irrationally fear that saying you would ultimately like to be in a different legal job will somehow be taken the wrong way. It won't. Theyre people too and probably have their own hopes for different legal jobs. I just would avoid saying "3-4 years at a firm then I'm gonna jump to startups" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2631406&forum_id=2#26025180) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2014 9:32 PM Author: green stirring lettuce pervert what's the "correct" answer to this? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2631406&forum_id=2#26025122) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2014 9:42 PM Author: big slimy shrine stain I would ask you why. If your answer is retarded (and it surely will be) I'd ding you right quick.
|
|
Date: July 29th, 2014 10:21 PM Author: cordovan lascivious area As a scientist, the idea of securing IP protection in addition to all the other corp/transactional stuff while trying to bring a new product to market with brilliant inventors is appealing to me. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2631406&forum_id=2#26025470) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2014 10:56 PM Author: umber coiffed stock car you're not a scientist anymore little bro (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2631406&forum_id=2#26025680) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2014 10:59 PM Author: titillating up-to-no-good clown My reaction would be "oh, isn't that cute." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2631406&forum_id=2#26025691) |