The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Attractive Hedge Fund Manager divorcing homely wife (Daily Mail)
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 23rd, 2017 1:19 PM Author: Comical Dilemma http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4253518/Hedge-fund-billionaire-David-Einhorn-separates-wife.html
Odds are hes a downlow Homo? Or did he realize he can bang 19 year old sluts 24/7 as a handsome Billionaire. |
Date: February 23rd, 2017 1:20 PM Author: Adventurous violet mexican Wow. She is horrible looking. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32684653) |
 |
Date: February 23rd, 2017 9:38 PM Author: Harsh Black Hissy Fit Looks like a ferengi (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32687974) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 1:46 PM Author: spectacular vermilion address sound barrier http://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3503921&mc=7&forum_id=2 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32684861) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 1:49 PM Author: sepia stead lol, he's still got that jewish grotesque anthony weiner face. Better looking than her, but only handsome to asian women. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32684879) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 3:07 PM Author: coral zippy stage Damn daddy. I think he'd be welcome in the gay twink community (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685356) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 1:50 PM Author: Translucent Dashing Meetinghouse doesnt look gay - teeth not whitened and haircut is very bad (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32684888) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 1:51 PM Author: Bat Shit Crazy Deranged Kitty Cat Any pics from the early years? Maybe he got trapped early on by a chick with an average looking face and banging body. I definitely have a few friends married to near butterfaces that had smoking bodies when they were in their 20s. What's that NYC chick with the big butt that takes pics all over NYC?
Edit: Like a Jen Selter |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 1:54 PM Author: Razzmatazz lay hedge fund managers should know better than being locked in to a rapidly depreciating asset (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32684925) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 1:56 PM Author: offensive nofapping garrison twinkling uncleanness jen selter looks better than that and so does her mother who's probably the same age (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32684943) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 1:58 PM Author: Vibrant bat-shit-crazy dopamine messiness lol jen selter is way, way, way better looking than this chick (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32684956) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 4:52 PM Author: Bat Shit Crazy Deranged Kitty Cat http://www.rhinoplasty-nyc.com/images/p36_front1.jpg That's pretty bad, bro. Yea, now, I'd eat Jen's ass without hesitation. Not sure, however, that you'd want to pass that nose onto your kids. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685936) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 5:04 PM Author: Puce corner electric furnace Seriously. Growing up with a nose like that, no wonder she decided to be an ass model for the attention. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32686037) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 1:55 PM Author: Lilac Kitchen Neither of them are attractive
They actually seem well matched looks wise |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 2:49 PM Author: Soul-stirring masturbator jewess lol fuck off with this flamebait
he's a handsome billionaire
she looks otherworldly in a bad way |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 4:51 PM Author: Beady-eyed digit ratio twist: they're both average looking centimillionaires (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685924) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 11:00 PM Author: aggressive rambunctious sneaky criminal hall (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32688538) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 11:06 PM Author: Lilac Kitchen Not really
He has a ginormous nozzle
I admit she doesn't look human |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 1:57 PM Author: orange bull headed school cafeteria partner That's a shame. All of these couples bear close resemblance to each other. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32684946) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 1:57 PM Author: Lilac Kitchen Cr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32684954) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 2:53 PM Author: House-broken galvanic cuckoldry sup David (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685256) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 3:39 PM Author: titillating university (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685538) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 2:54 PM Author: Puce corner electric furnace She didn't marry him for his looks, and if he was just some striving nobody when she married him she probably didn't marry him for his money either.
Hope she's getting a hefty payout in the divorce. So much for loyalty. |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 2:56 PM Author: mildly autistic old irish cottage the disgusting part is this bitch will get paid. Women should get nothing in divorce (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685283) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 2:59 PM Author: Puce corner electric furnace She agreed to marry him when he was just another nigga in the struggle and gave him 24 of the best years of her life. That's worth quite a bit, and if he didn't make her sign a prenup or postnup (not a family law master man) then she gets whatever is owed him under law.
Chances are he's ditching her to bang 24yo Lithuanian girls and she'll probably die alone. That's pretty shitty of him. |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 3:00 PM Author: mildly autistic old irish cottage lol she freeloaded off him for 24 years and lived a lifestyle she could never have attained on her own. The free ride is over, fend for yourself cunt. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685307) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 3:01 PM Author: Puce corner electric furnace I agree with you in principle for couples who start a relationship as economic equals and marry later in life and have no kids or shared properties or shared business interests. There's magic in a "what's mine is mine, what's yours is yours" setup. But keep everything in your name if that's the case. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685319) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 3:04 PM Author: mildly autistic old irish cottage While she worked as (((journalist))), he no doubt paid for everything allowing her to spend all of her money on herself, then provided a lavish lifestyle she couldn't afford and i'm sure his connections furthered her career. Then on top of those perks she is supposed to be entitled to half of his shit and enough $ to remain in a lifestyle he provided for her that she didn't earn? Fuck this gay Earth. Go back to the 1950's, toss the bitch out on her ear. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685338) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 3:16 PM Author: Puce corner electric furnace So assume we can easily separate the money she earned as a journalist from the money he earned as a hedge fund manager. She gets to keep what she earned and nothing more or less.
What to do about jointly owned properties? Businesses?
Also, going forward, you would advocate for spouses to keep separate accounts so they could be easily separated upon dissolution?
Also, what if the roles were reversed? She was the big money earner and he was the journalist whose career was furthered by association?
What if she (springboarding partially off his connections initially) started a successful company which he wasn't involved in at all? How to separate that?
A 50-50 split is easy and clean and we don't have to get into discussions of "your contributions to the marriage were more worthy than mine". |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 3:21 PM Author: mildly autistic old irish cottage Jointly owned properties and businesses? You mean ones he purchased with $ he earned and put her name on? LOL. Yes if she was rich and he was poor he should walk with nothing. The wealthy spouse shouldn't be punitively punished for marrying the wrong partner. The poor one honestly doesn't deserve shit. They already got a vacation from reality at the expense of the other spouse for the balance of the marriage, they don't have a right to be pampered for life as a result. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685436) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 3:32 PM Author: Puce corner electric furnace I didn't read the rest of the article.
It could also be argued that the nonwealthy spouse shouldn't be punished to walk away "with nothing" (not just the money she made from her career while in the marriage) for marrying the wrong partner. After 24 years, you can argue that they gave things a solid go and were the "right partners" until something systemic changed.
Do you discount emotional support and other ways in which a spouse can add value to your life? Do you discount any of the non-financial ways in which people (like your parents, siblings, friends) add value to your life? Do you think that you shouldn't be entitled to your parents' estate and it should go to a charity in their name because you didn't technically contribute to your parents' legacy?
|
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 4:34 PM Author: rose gas station Sure, she added emotional value or whatever during the marriage, just like he added financial value FOR THE DURATION OF THE MARRIAGE. The equivalent would be if the court mandated that she continue to offer emotional support or other support to him AFTER the marriage was ended. Sounds ridic right? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685815) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 4:46 PM Author: exhilarant rough-skinned idiot lodge no, she is unlikely to get alimony. this is just about splitting up money they owned jointly because it was earned while they were married.
bros, if you marry someone and have three kids with them, they are going to get half unless you have a pre-nup. |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 4:53 PM Author: Puce corner electric furnace It sounds like you just want to stick it to women for being there when their marriages implode.
Money is an easy thing to quantify. Basically if you stay married to someone for 25 years and support him while he builds his career and you shit out three of his kids while he's off being a master of the universe, you should be entitled to at least a sizeable minority of his net worth. |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 11:02 PM Author: aggressive rambunctious sneaky criminal hall lazy flame
EDIT: oh nevermind, this must be gracekelly. carry on. |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 11:08 PM Author: Lilac Kitchen "emotional support"? Why would she have to give emotional support? This dood probably worked 24/7 for like 25 years and was barely home..probably hired a nanny to look after their 3 kids while his wife was at the spa. This is stereotypical for every big hedge fund dood or biglaw partner. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32688594) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 3:12 PM Author: racy sadistic mood institution literally the entire premise of no-fault divorce and marital property regimes that divide assets equally is to avoid having to litigate shit like this. The breadwinner claims he earned everything, the non-breadwinner claims they enabled the breadwinner to do so via their sacrifice, ad infinitum. It's a mess. So they say, "fuck it, it's all 50/50. You don't like it, get a prenup or post-nup." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685387) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 3:19 PM Author: mildly autistic old irish cottage Fuck "enabled" and nebulous concepts like that. Let's be realistic. Women are useless and she did nothing and deserves nothing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685425) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 3:21 PM Author: racy sadistic mood institution I could literally agree with you 100% and it wouldn't matter. What you're saying is a bit autistic to the extent that you think there is any probability that any western legal system would entertain it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685434) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 3:21 PM Author: mildly autistic old irish cottage I know it wouldn't, just enrages me (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685438) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 3:21 PM Author: racy sadistic mood institution I understand (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685441) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 3:46 PM Author: Puce corner electric furnace I get that it chaps your ass that the nonworking spouse is legally entitled to potentially so much. But saying shit like "women are useless" is a bit BEEP BEEP BEEP. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685576) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 3:20 PM Author: khaki bateful locale weed whacker (Incel) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685432) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 3:21 PM Author: mildly autistic old irish cottage you must be a woman, any man is enraged at the thought of getting 1/2 his shit stolen. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685442) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 3:22 PM Author: khaki bateful locale weed whacker No, I'm just not autistic. Or at least less so than you.
If you don't like the rules, don't get married or contract around them. I'd suggest the former for you since your conception of marriage would inevitably lead to divorce anyway. |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 3:23 PM Author: mildly autistic old irish cottage There's nothing autistic about not wanting to lose half of the empire and $ you spent your life building so some entitled twat can take it to live the high life and fuck the poolboy without doing anything to earn it. What sort of cuck are you? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685451) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 3:27 PM Author: Navy Disrespectful Associate Locus Lolled out loud at "empire". I'd never heard of this faggot. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685471) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 3:30 PM Author: Puce corner electric furnace Don't get married if that's your attitude.
I'm scared of shit not working out and some homeboy getting half of what I worked to create, especially if he's divorcing me for some Lithuanian 20yo with a feeble grasp of English.
And I generally agree that if a couple get married and there are no kids or jointly-owned properties, a "what's mine is mine, what's yours is yours" split is perfectly reasonable, especially if both are somewhat later in life and have accumulated their own wealth.
But most people value the non-monetary contributions of their spouse (moral support, blowjobs, back rubs, anything involving the kids) as well as valuing their spouse as an equal in the relationship even if their roles are different, and if shit just doesn't work out (no cheating, no beating) then be amicable grownups.
If you don't like the state's rules re: divorce, contract around them to form a setup that's more appropriate for your values and life situation. |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 4:17 PM Author: Talented frum foreskin house (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685740) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 4:29 PM Author: Puce corner electric furnace Is love dead?
Let's think about this here. Say some girl pledges her fidelity to you, love-honor-obey style, when you're still some nobody trying to hustle.
After a decade and a half it's clear that things are breaking big in a YUUUUUUGE way for you. You don't want your honey to work (because you don't want her worrying her pretty li'l head over facts and figures) and you love the idea of her spending some of your extra dollars on pretty things that put a big smile on her face. You also want a few Juniors of your own, and also maybe a Junior Miss that you can spoil until she gets married.
Unfortunately, as the marriage reaches its twenty-fifth year, you and her just are finding things harder and harder to work. The young ladies at Fashion Week (people take you to the darndest events to curry favor) are looking younger and younger, and you think you deserve some freedom. But you don't want to step out on the woman who supported you when you were nothing.
So you file for divorce. But she's developed champagne tastes over the years: a flearidden studio in Jackson Heights won't do for her. And no way is she going to move in with her auntie and uncle in Bel-Air. |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 3:40 PM Author: Twinkling hyperactive love of her life wait so is his wife wearing one of those 'purge' masks (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685543) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 4:18 PM Author: Talented frum foreskin house (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685742) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 3:44 PM Author: floppy glassy striped hyena She will get half his billions. She'll get to fuck as many 6'5" 20 year old BBCs with six-packs that she wants. Unlimited fuck toys for her, if she wants. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685561) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 5:12 PM Author: Outnumbered Prole Halford I don't think mentally healthy women of her age and background think like that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32686103) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 4:24 PM Author: Talented frum foreskin house (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32685772) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 4:44 PM Author: exhilarant rough-skinned idiot lodge there is no reason why either side needs more than that.
she had three kids with him. most of the money will end up going to the kids anyway. Who the fuck cares? |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 9:32 PM Author: Violent trust fund black woman what the fuck kind of logic is this. im sure i would care if a woman was getting hundreds of millions of dollars on me on some ridiculous basis that she "supported" me while i was creating billions in wealth. if the dude wants to give money to the kids, then he can do that himself without using the ex-wife as a conduit. agree with the previous poster that $20 million seems like more than enough. seems pretty easy to figure out who contributed the wealth to the relationship in most cases (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32687935) |
|
Date: February 24th, 2017 10:21 AM Author: exhilarant rough-skinned idiot lodge sorry bro. don't get married if that is your attitude (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32690523) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 5:01 PM Author: sepia stead lol that's barely middle class (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32686009) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 5:05 PM Author: House-broken galvanic cuckoldry (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32686040) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 11:07 PM Author: excitant half-breed temple His wife is horrifying. My god. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534375&forum_id=2#32688582) |