The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Watched original blade runner. what a retarded pretentious gasbag movie
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:32 AM Author: Disrespectful parlour i guess it was groundbreaking for its time? lol wtf is this shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492483) |
 |
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:35 AM Author: peach associate Cr couldn’t get thru that shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492506) |
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:33 AM Author: Flickering Ruddy Bawdyhouse Did you watch the Director's Cut? The original theatrical version is less "arty" and pretentious. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492486) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:37 AM Author: Disrespectful parlour yaeh, final cut why the fuck did he have a fucking dove in his hands in the last fight lmao that was the last straw |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:43 AM Author: Hairraiser cordovan puppy nursing home that version sucks (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492556) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:33 AM Author: naked stage kitty how was this not an FLW thread (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492488) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:35 AM Author: Aphrodisiac Cuckold Filthpig (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492509) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:36 AM Author: histrionic puce library mood (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492518) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:37 AM Author: Disrespectful parlour we were birthed from the same asshole (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492525) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:34 AM Author: misanthropic azure pervert cruise ship don't pay attention to the dialogue as much as the audio/visual aesthetics.
it's a shame are culture is so verbally-focused and can't enjoy things that aren't trying too hard to seem smart. |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:36 AM Author: self-centered internal respiration (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492510) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:37 AM Author: Disrespectful parlour its well shot for sure
terrible movie thuogh |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:47 AM Author: federal theater This is definitely a result of the feminization of are culturw (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492581) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:51 AM Author: Disrespectful parlour yea definitely feminist to expect an interesting story or characters or dialogue in a movie (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492607) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 10:15 AM Author: Multi-colored erotic new version Lol, the other way around bro (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34493616) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 10:15 AM Author: Multi-colored erotic new version (actual aids faggot) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34493618) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:36 AM Author: Hairraiser cordovan puppy nursing home it's a visual masterpiece and the sound effects were groundbreaking at the time (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492515) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:38 AM Author: Disrespectful parlour fair. shitty movie (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492529) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:36 AM Author: indecent dragon ticket booth I watched it again last week after I saw BR 2049. I thought it still held up well. If nothing else, the cinematogtaphy & aesthetic are still top notch. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492519) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:38 AM Author: Disrespectful parlour yes but it's not a good story with interesting or believeable characters or plot development (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492527) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:41 AM Author: Aphrodisiac Cuckold Filthpig (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492541) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:41 AM Author: Hairraiser cordovan puppy nursing home the story isn't that bad at first. the problem, like with any AI movie, is that it's impossible for reasonably intelligent people to empathize with AI characters. it doesn't help that Darryl Hannah is an awful actor and ugly, and takes over the movie at the midway point. that being said, if you see the early 80s HBO/showtime version (with Harrison Ford narration, and no gore removed like the theatrical version), and you appreciate Raymond Chandler detective stories and noir in general, it's a good enough story to support the amazing cinematography and sfx (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492543) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:43 AM Author: Disrespectful parlour so the director/final cut is actually WORSE than theatrical cut? interesting (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492555) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:45 AM Author: Hairraiser cordovan puppy nursing home yes absolutely. ironically, Ridley Scott's director's cut of Alexander is epic and significantly better than the original. same with his director's cut of The Counselor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492570) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:59 AM Author: razzle shrine man ur retarded. and riddley didnt even direct alexander, and that movie is shit with the directors cut or without it. i think it was released as extended cut though, there is no directors cut of it. are you thinking of that middle eastern something heaven movie? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492652) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 1:00 AM Author: Hairraiser cordovan puppy nursing home didn't even see it tbh (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492658) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 10:13 AM Author: Translucent drunken double fault Darryl Hannah was hot (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34493612) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:39 AM Author: Disrespectful parlour also, he basiclaly raepd that android, lol @ that scene being in any movie today libs would flip their shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492532) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:47 AM Author: self-centered internal respiration It's a 180 scene and fulfills a FEMALE fantasy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492580) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:41 AM Author: razzle shrine all these memories, lost in time, like tears in the rain...
its a good movie, dude. its the best there is. try again. |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:44 AM Author: Disrespectful parlour you missed the shitty parts of the speech
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
and the original script speech lmao:
I have known adventures, seen places you people will never see, I've been Offworld and back...frontiers! I've stood on the back deck of a blinker bound for the Plutition Camps with sweat in my eyes watching the stars fight on the shoulder of Orion. I've felt wind in my hair, riding test boats off the black galaxies and seen an attack fleet burn like a match and disappear. I've seen it...felt it! |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:45 AM Author: razzle shrine ok? sounds good to me.
180 movie. |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:46 AM Author: Disrespectful parlour sci fi mumbo jumo that adds nothing to the movie. the tears in the rain is the only good line and it was improvised by teh actor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492576) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:51 AM Author: razzle shrine actor improvised it because he understood the scene and what it was going for. it was 180 without it anyways, he just added the cherry on top. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492606) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 1:05 AM Author: hyperactive irradiated institution juggernaut that speech is fucking awesome... what are you talking about?
First, it reinforces the central theme that the replicants are more human than those who are trying to exterminate them (because it's clear that he sees wonder in the world).
Second, he's describing something that sounds visually incredible yet it's off-screen so you have to imagine it. Basically the movie has restraint. This is something most modern "sci-fi" shit movies completely lack.
|
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 10:37 AM Author: avocado stimulating blood rage Frontiers! People getting blasted every night. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34493705) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:45 AM Author: Disrespectful parlour is blade runner 2049 this bad/pretentious, or a better movie? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492566) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:50 AM Author: razzle shrine its different. but kinda similar. that was the whole idea, i guess. make something similar, but have a different feel to it. the violence is still very important to the film. outbursts of violence still as powerful as the first one, but i think the first one is better in every respect anyways. but visually, the second one does some things are are even more jaw dropping, and they had to deliver on that because the first one was jaw dropping visually. first one is still better though, the scene where dekart chases the snake stripper through eh streets and then shoots her through the glass is better violent scene than any scene in the new blade runner, so in that way they made an inferior movie. none of the death scenes come close to that one, or the guy with the bird in his hand, or the death of tyrell. somehow all those felt more sad and sombre than any of the ones in the new one, however the new one had some interesting elements to it that im glad it was made, it was 180 in its own right. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492598) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 1:06 AM Author: hyperactive irradiated institution juggernaut If you didn't like the original, I don't think you'll like the new one tbh (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492685) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:46 AM Author: Chestnut electric jewess It's a visionary piece of filmmaking but LOL at Ridley Scott's whiskey-afflicted inability to create dramatic tension or investment in the people on the screen. They somehow hit on a remarkable formula, one so good that it overcomes the horrendous script and acting, but it really feels like an accident that it is succeeds in the manner it does. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492573) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:48 AM Author: self-centered internal respiration But FPLB without Ridley Scott's inability to relate to people or their petty squabbles there would be no impetus to create the "remarkable formula." A bit analogous to Kubrick in this way. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492588) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 1:14 AM Author: Chestnut electric jewess Kubrick is kind of like a boomer Wes Anderson. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492719) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 10:11 AM Author: self-centered internal respiration Interesting comparison. Would rate Kubrick much higher. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34493602) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:49 AM Author: Disrespectful parlour what makes it so remarkable? just the cinematography? influences on other sci fi movies? i mean it's a cult classic but that's about it no? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492592) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 1:06 AM Author: Chestnut electric jewess The design, cinematography, and the way they so vividly portrayed this rich, captivating world that felt startling and unique makes it an arguable creative masterpiece. There are few films that rival it in that respect. It was profoundly influential on all kinds of artist working in visual media and pop culture and genre fiction more broadly. Visual and filmmaking ideas from that movie are still heavily trafficked. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492686) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:53 AM Author: razzle shrine bullshit. not all movies have to be the same. blade runner is kind of like the revenant or eraserhead, its avant garde. but it was so well crafted you dont even consider how avant garde it is and just go tearing into it because it doesnt conform to what you expect of movies. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492619) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 1:10 AM Author: Chestnut electric jewess Avant garde is a stretch. I like Ridley Scott but he's emotionally tone-deaf to the point of likely spectrum diagnosis and he's borderline incoherent as a narrative filmmaker due to his devotion to brilliant visual experiences at the expense of most else. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492704) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:47 AM Author: federal theater ngl I fell asleep while watching it. Granted I was hammered but it was just dull It was director's cut fwiw |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:53 AM Author: Disrespectful parlour cr there were several points where im like what teh FUCK am i watchign (e.g. when that acrobatic robot started flipping around him) and when that fucking dove came out i actually gave a "you've got to be shitting me" laugh calling this a good movie is some serious flame |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 1:12 AM Author: Chestnut electric jewess That cut with the bird is awful. I have laughed every time I have ever seen it, never fails to shock with how shitty it is. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492712) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 1:49 AM Author: Cracking circlehead The casting is terrible. Aside from Harrison Ford and Rutger Hauer everyone else is shitty, wooden, or just weird and out of place. That toy maker looks like a prole goober. Edward James Olmos is supposed to be Asian or something. Darryl Hannah is always the shittiest actor in every movie she does. Sean Young is ok but totally forgettable. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492893) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:49 AM Author: cocky rebellious tattoo I must be weird then because I genuinely related to Ford's character and I had a soft spot for Rachel. I think Roy Batty should have had more screen time to warrant the climactic chase scene at the end though. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492589) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:50 AM Author: Disrespectful parlour what version did you watch? mine didnt have any ford narration so he was just some asshole awndering around, and rachel was some damsel in distress that he raped in his hotel room (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492601) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:52 AM Author: cocky rebellious tattoo Yeah the version without narration. "Just some asshole wandering around" is exactly the kind of character I like to watch. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492609) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:53 AM Author: Cracking circlehead The technology is so gay. CRT screens everywhere, cars look like old Chryslers with ridiculous fenders bolted onto them, there's no wireless communication between devices, and people still smoke in office buildings. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492617) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 12:57 AM Author: Disrespectful parlour Cr plus men having sex with WOMEN lmao (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34492643) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 9:15 AM Author: Flickering Ruddy Bawdyhouse (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34493420) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 10:15 AM Author: Multi-colored erotic new version (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#34493620) |
|
Date: June 16th, 2020 7:29 PM Author: Disrespectful parlour (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#40431247) |
|
Date: June 16th, 2020 7:35 PM Author: Well-lubricated fantasy-prone goyim address Director's Cut is cr. And yes, very innovative for the time. Kicked off cyberpunk genre. Influenced anime etc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770262&forum_id=2#40431287) |