\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

James Damore's memo is sexual harassment, according to U.S. labor board lawyer

https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/02/20/googles-fired-enginee...
sick spectacular jew
  02/21/18
orwell was 10000000% right need to burn it down and start...
crystalline pit
  02/21/18
All the “labor board lawyer” (a Trump appointee) found was t...
Indigo glittery patrolman
  02/21/18
Uhm
navy casino ladyboy
  02/21/18
New GC has already announced his intention to roll back almo...
Indigo glittery patrolman
  02/21/18
Welcome to xo, you’re really gonna like it here
Trip mint gaping
  02/21/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 3:24 AM
Author: sick spectacular jew

https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/02/20/googles-fired-engineer-sexually-harassed-co-workers-via-memo-u-s-labor-board-lawyer/

LOL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899238&forum_id=2#35450803)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 4:16 AM
Author: crystalline pit

orwell was 10000000% right

need to burn it down and start over

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899238&forum_id=2#35450826)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 5:04 AM
Author: Indigo glittery patrolman

All the “labor board lawyer” (a Trump appointee) found was that statements about differences in gender aren’t “protected concerted activity” within the meaning of a law mainly intended to permit employees to unionize.

It’s ridiculous how people are politicizing this correct outcome. If you disagree with the labor board here, then you are in agreement in principle with the Obama board, which issued decisions finding almost anything to be protected by the NLRA

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899238&forum_id=2#35450859)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 5:15 AM
Author: navy casino ladyboy

Uhm

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899238&forum_id=2#35450865)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 5:21 AM
Author: Indigo glittery patrolman

New GC has already announced his intention to roll back almost every shitlib policy the nlrb issued over the last 10 years.

Put this memo in a different context and assume it was going on about black lives matter and said some negative things about white people. Assume he was fired only for those statements. Should the memo be protected by a law that was passed primarily to facilitate and oversee relations between management and organized labor? The shitlib former GC of the nlrb probably would have said yes.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899238&forum_id=2#35450866)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 5:27 AM
Author: Trip mint gaping

Welcome to xo, you’re really gonna like it here

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899238&forum_id=2#35450867)