As if the Kremlin is going to reveal their secrets to the US?

You think the US has jurisdiction there?

The only reason for the Magnitsky act is a dead whistleblower. Good luck finding more whistleblowers.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900952&forum_id=2#35464772)

What was the FBI doing in 2014 other than giving him a pass calling him small potatoes? Had they been competent, he would've been prosecuted then and there.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900952&forum_id=2#35464820)

And that's a friendly state, lol.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900952&forum_id=2#35464950)

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/international-community-mobilizes-recover-stolen-assets-people-ukraine

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900952&forum_id=2#35507142)

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-yanukovich/toppled-mafia-president-cost-ukraine-up-to-100-billion-prosecutor-says-idUSBREA3T0K820140430

Even after the Ukranian government was toppled and the provisional stooge Ukranian government announced cooperation with the US, Holder and the DOJ still failed to accomplish anything with their 2014 investigation.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900952&forum_id=2#35464924)

Just do let a traitor be POTUS so you can investigate further. Lol no way.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900952&forum_id=2#35465391)

Why did the Russian oligarch you hype up over the 2008 purchase buy properties from Sandy Weill and Will Smith?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900952&forum_id=2#35465515)

How did the FBI not have anything on the 'oligarchs' until a whistleblower came out?

How did the incompetent FBI let go of an investigation even when a friendly jurisdiction like Ukraine provided cooperation?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900952&forum_id=2#35465560)

The reality is that the FBI couldn't even prosecute a case in a friendly jurisdiction, and you think that somehow speaks well of their ability to effectively expose criminal activities in a hostile jurisdiction.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900952&forum_id=2#35465628)

That's not how the real estate developers operate, anyone can buy a property, they don't layer for their customers (which would be pointless for the following reason), and they don't have obligations to conduct due diligence.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900952&forum_id=2#35477475)

None of the money laundering conspiracy theories make much sense. Buying real estate doesn’t wash dirty money. And real estate doesn’t have KYC laws like banking. You wouldn’t need to buy off the seller. You’d just buy their property.

It’s far more likely that subhuman Slavs have trashy new money sensibilities and would buy from a “brand” like trump.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900952&forum_id=2#35467080)

So, first of all, for the case to proceed, they would have to discover evidence of money laundering in Russia (a territory in which they don't have jurisdiction and the only incidence in which such activity was exposed was by a deceased whistleblower) and then on top of that due to the lack of KYC, they would have to somehow prove that Trump knowingly understood where the money was coming from. Of course, this doesn't make much sense, since he wouldn't need to ask in the first place.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900952&forum_id=2#35467258)

Does every stick of gum a mobster buy make the c-store a criminal enterprise?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900952&forum_id=2#35469337)