https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/08/24/president-trumps-false-claim-about-murders-south-african-farms/?utm_term=.7b8ed151e3a5

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4061038&forum_id=2#36684488)

1) there do exist disparities

2) those disparities cause massive resentment, rightly or wrongly

3) since almost 3/4 of the country is experiencing this resentment, it needs to be fixed, even if OP doesn’t know the “right” solution

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4061038&forum_id=2#36684587)

how can so many intelligent people be this stupid, to continue to believe such irrational things

it goes to show that 'intelligence' is not the same as judgment.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4061038&forum_id=2#36684563)

Any attempts at redistribution will end in disaster

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4061038&forum_id=2#36685026)

libs come up with a new just-so explanation every time to justify it, but every week another explicitly anti-white policy is trotted out. "it's okay for an editor of the largest newspaper to call for the death of all white people in America, they're the majority!" "We need to confiscate white-owned land in South Africa, they're the minority!"

Every livable piece of land has been conquered, claimed, annexed, confiscated, abandoned, settled and/or resettled 10 times over, by thousands of peoples, races, religions throughout human history. But for some reason we need to unwind the world to some imaginary date around 1790 or so. assuming libs' motives are sincere, they would need to accept that it's the height of absurdity to try to reset the world to some arbitrary "fair" point. but libs' motives aren't sincere. so why do we even indulge the debate at face value?

besides being dangerously nonsensical and unfair, these policies are also extremely inefficient economically and rather than increase equality they lead to debacles like Venezuela and Zimbabwe pretty much every time. There are proven remedies for social inequality--you could apply a (reasonable) special tax on farmers earning over a certain profit level deemed excessive, and use that money to support education, hiring programs, business loans and grants, etc. for "underprivileged" groups to gain a foothold in the 10,000 other industries that exist that aren't farming. and neither the tax nor the grants are explicitly race-based which encourages a sense of fairness for all, which is crucial to social cohesion.

but of course that's not what happens. instead we get a nonsense policy that is explictly racially biased, and that will FOR SURE trash the economy, as one would expect when you replace professional career farmers en masse with novices just to make a political statement rooted in vengeance.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4061038&forum_id=2#36685037)

it's pure rubbish

OMG INDIANS LIVED IN WYOMING 300 YEARS AGO, THEREFORE JEWS/ASIANS SHOULD OWN AMERICA AND ALL WHITES SHOULD DIE

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4061038&forum_id=2#36685102)

http://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3411981&mc=69&forum_id=2

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4061038&forum_id=2#36689001)

http://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3411981&mc=69&forum_id=2

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4061038&forum_id=2#36689118)

http://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3411981&mc=69&forum_id=2

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4061038&forum_id=2#36688999)

http://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3411981&mc=69&forum_id=2

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4061038&forum_id=2#36689084)

http://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3411981&mc=69&forum_id=2

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4061038&forum_id=2#36689114)

If group B, who are living on poor dirt, could be be given some of the GOOD dirt, they’d be as successful as group A.

This is nonsensical even if someone hates Group B. If someone actually wants to see Group B succeed, this is also tragic

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4061038&forum_id=2#36685130)

on one hand, if you bought land or even inherited it, it was your property. and taking someone's property without compensation is considered in the U.S. to be a violation of a fundamental, inalienable human right. So from that POV, a government can't just take land without it being stealing. And stealing from only one race to give to another to tip the scales is pretty much what we call "evil racism" (except if the victims are white people it seems).

But presumably the above isn't true in the transition from one system of government (apartheid) to another--what we had in S.A. was a political revolution, and in that case you would assume that some property would be seized and redistributed, and that would be justified for the same reasons that the revolution was justified (those in power and the upper class were criminals themselves). The world condemned apartheid so people who benefited from that system could be expected to stand to lose when it was overthrown.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4061038&forum_id=2#36685998)