What’s the neckbeard argument against direct elections of US Senators?
| Supple plaza blood rage | 10/15/18 | | histrionic gay resort | 10/15/18 | | Shaky sneaky criminal bawdyhouse | 10/15/18 | | floppy office | 10/15/18 | | Vengeful turdskin feces | 10/15/18 | | floppy office | 10/15/18 | | Supple plaza blood rage | 10/15/18 | | Burgundy nudist area hissy fit | 10/15/18 | | Razzle-dazzle navy travel guidebook heaven | 10/15/18 | | Exhilarant set | 10/15/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 15th, 2018 11:37 AM Author: Shaky sneaky criminal bawdyhouse
The interests of the American people are better served when government power is at the state level rather than the federal level. State legislatures were better able to resist federal overreach when they had a direct say in who the senators were.
Furthermore it was a lot easier for the senators to be controlled by a small body rather than a statewide electorate. Now the only entities with significant influence over most senators are GC Corporations.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4106734&forum_id=2#37026825) |
|
|