https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1063268252938264576

https://pacer-documents.s3.amazonaws.com/179/399086/18919235200.pdf

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4134318&forum_id=2#37242362)

The Washington Post

Democracy Dies in Darkness

Try 1 month for $1

Sign In

Newsletters & Alerts

Gift Subscriptions

Contact Us

Help Desk

Thanks for reading. Try one month of unlimited access for $1.

View offer

×

National Security

Julian Assange has been charged, prosecutors reveal inadvertently in court filing

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange walks onto the balcony of the Ecuadorean Embassy in London. (Kirsty Wigglesworth/AP)

By Matt Zapotosky and

Devlin Barrett November 15 at 11:19 PM

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been charged under seal, prosecutors inadvertently revealed in a recently unsealed court filing — a development that could significantly advance the probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election and have major implications for those who publish government secrets.

The disclosure came in a filing in a case unrelated to Assange. Assistant U.S. Attorney Kellen S. Dwyer, urging a judge to keep the matter sealed, wrote that “due to the sophistication of the defendant and the publicity surrounding the case, no other procedure is likely to keep confidential the fact that Assange has been charged.” Later, Dwyer wrote the charges would “need to remain sealed until Assange is arrested.”

Dwyer is also assigned to the WikiLeaks case. People familiar with the matter said what Dwyer was disclosing was true, but unintentional.

Joshua Stueve, a spokesman for the U.S. attorney’s office in the Eastern District of Virginia, said, “The court filing was made in error. That was not the intended name for this filing.”

An FBI spokeswoman declined to comment.

Federal prosecutors in the Eastern District of Virginia have long been investigating Assange and, in the Trump administration, had begun taking a second look at whether to charge members of the WikiLeaks organization for the 2010 leak of diplomatic cables and military documents that the anti-secrecy group published. Investigators also had explored whether WikiLeaks could face criminal liability for the more recent revelation of sensitive CIA cybertools.

Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III also has explored WikiLeaks’ publication of emails from the Democratic National Committee and the account of Hillary Clinton’s then-campaign chairman, John D. Podesta. Officials have alleged that the emails were hacked by Russian spies and transferred to WikiLeaks.

[In email to Trump’s campaign strategist, Roger Stone implied he knew of WikiLeaks’s plans]

Mueller also has been exploring, among other things, communications between the group and associates of President Trump, including political operative Roger Stone and commentator and conspiracy theorist Jerome Corsi.

In July, Mueller’s office charged 12 Russian military spies with conspiring to hack DNC computers, stealing the organization’s data and publishing the files in an effort to disrupt the election, and referred in an indictment to WikiLeaks, described only as “Organization 1,” as the platform the Russians used to release the stolen emails.

A spokesman for the special counsel’s office declined to comment.

It was not immediately clear what charges Assange would face. In the past, prosecutors had contemplated pursuing a case involving conspiracy, theft of government property or violating the Espionage Act. But whether to charge the WikiLeaks founder was hardly a foregone conclusion. In the Obama administration, the Justice Department had concluded that pursuing Assange would be akin to prosecuting a news organization. In the Trump administration, though, then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions had taken a more aggressive stance and vowed to crack down on all government leaks.

Barry J. Pollack, one of Assange’s attorneys, said, “The only thing more irresponsible than charging a person for publishing truthful information would be to put in a public filing information that clearly was not intended for the public and without any notice to Mr. Assange. Obviously, I have no idea if he has actually been charged or for what, but the notion that the federal criminal charges could be brought based on the publication of truthful information is an incredibly dangerous precedent to set.”

The filing in the Eastern District of Virginia came Aug. 22 in a case that combines national security and sex trafficking. Seitu Sulayman Kokayi, 29, was charged with enticing a 15-year-old girl to have sex with him and send him pornographic images of herself. But he was detained in part because he “has a substantial interest in terrorist acts,” according to the court filing.

His father-in-law, according to the filing, has been convicted of terrorist acts. The case involves previously classified information, according to government filings, and prosecutors plan to use information obtained under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Kokayi was indicted last week and is set to be arraigned Friday morning.

[Analysis: A timeline of the Roger Stone-WikiLeaks question]

The case had been sealed until early September, though by itself it attracted little notice. On Thursday evening, Seamus Hughes, deputy director of the Program on Extremism at George Washington University, who is known for scrubbing court filings, joked about the apparent error on Twitter — which first brought it to the attention of reporters.

Even if he is charged, Assange’s coming to the United States to face trial is no sure thing. Since June 2012, Assange has been living in the Ecuadoran Embassy in London, afraid that if he steps outside he will be arrested.

When he first sought asylum in the embassy, he was facing possible extradition to Sweden in a sex crimes case. He has argued that case was a pretext for what he predicted would be his arrest and extradition to the United States.

In the years since, the Swedish case has been closed, but Assange has said he cannot risk leaving the embassy because the United States would attempt to have him arrested and extradited for disclosures of U.S. government secrets. Throughout that time, the United States has refused to say whether there are any sealed charges against Assange.

If Assange were to leave the embassy and be arrested by British authorities, he would likely still fight extradition in the British courts.

Rachel Weiner and Ellen Nakashima contributed to this report.

479 Comments

World news email alerts

Important breaking news emails for major happenings around the world.

E-mail address

By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Matt Zapotosky

Matt Zapotosky covers the Justice Department for The Washington Post's national security team. He has previously worked covering the federal courthouse in Alexandria and local law enforcement in Prince George's County and Southern Maryland. Follow

Devlin Barrett

Devlin Barrett writes about national security and law enforcement for The Washington Post. He has previously worked at the Wall Street Journal, the Associated Press and the New York Post, where he started as a copy boy. Follow

subscribe

The story must be told.

Your subscription supports journalism that matters.

Try 1 month for $1

Paid Promoted Stories

Maryland: Born Before 1985? Government Will Pay $355/Month Off Your Mortgage (You Must Qualify)

Maryland: Born Before 1985? Government Will Pay $355/Month Off Your Mortgage (You Must Qualify)

first-news.co

Maryland: Born Before 1985? Government Will Pay $355/Month Off Your Mortgage If You Qualify

Maryland: Born Before 1985? Government Will Pay $355/Month Off Your Mortgage If You Qualify

financejournal24.com

How Older Women Are Slimming Down (Hint: You've Never Seen This Before)

How Older Women Are Slimming Down (Hint: You've Never Seen This Before)

healthynatural.science

Maryland May Pay Off Your Home If You Live Near Baltimore

Maryland May Pay Off Your Home If You Live Near Baltimore

Fetcharate

Recommended by

Most Read World

1

Julian Assange has been charged, prosecutors reveal inadvertently in court filing

2

Navy SEALs and Marine Raiders face murder charges in death of Special Forces soldier

3

U.S., Saudi steps in Khashoggi case don’t go far enough, lawmakers say

4

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un inspects testing of unspecified new ‘tactical weapon’

5

Saudi Arabia distances crown prince from killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi

Reporting the facts for over 140 years.

Try 1 month for $10 $1

Send me this offer

washingtonpost.com

© 1996-2018 The Washington Post

Help and Contact Us

Policies and Standards

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Print Products Terms of Sale

Digital Products Terms of Sale

Submissions and Discussion Policy

RSS Terms of Service

Ad Choices

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4134318&forum_id=2#37243034)

what happens to a guy making a colossal fuck up like this? just a stern talking to then he goes on in his career like normal?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4134318&forum_id=2#37243440)