simple but tricky probability question
| Blathering Round Eye | 01/19/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/19/19 | | elite brindle pistol | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | elite brindle pistol | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | bateful misunderstood boistinker church | 01/20/19 | | elite brindle pistol | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | Blathering Round Eye | 01/19/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/19/19 | | Blathering Round Eye | 01/19/19 | | Appetizing peach chapel | 01/19/19 | | twisted brunch | 01/19/19 | | Blathering Round Eye | 01/19/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/19/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | Underhanded Pungent Queen Of The Night | 01/19/19 | | Odious Cerise Corn Cake Gaming Laptop | 01/19/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/19/19 | | Blathering Round Eye | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | elite brindle pistol | 01/20/19 | | Dead university | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | Dead university | 01/20/19 | | Dead university | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | elite brindle pistol | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | Laughsome Ape Karate | 01/19/19 | | Blathering Round Eye | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | crystalline comical garrison | 01/20/19 | | bateful misunderstood boistinker church | 01/20/19 | | elite brindle pistol | 01/20/19 | | passionate skinny woman | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | passionate skinny woman | 01/20/19 | | Lilac internet-worthy hall | 01/20/19 | | alcoholic milky center telephone | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | alcoholic milky center telephone | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | magical private investor travel guidebook | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | magical private investor travel guidebook | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | magical private investor travel guidebook | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | magical private investor travel guidebook | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | magical private investor travel guidebook | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | magical private investor travel guidebook | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | magical private investor travel guidebook | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | magical private investor travel guidebook | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | magical private investor travel guidebook | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | Laughsome Ape Karate | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | vivacious athletic conference electric furnace | 01/20/19 | | Bright plaza | 01/20/19 | | Poppy whorehouse toilet seat | 01/20/19 | | avocado excitant halford | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | Motley aqua kitchen | 01/20/19 | | charismatic brethren headpube | 01/20/19 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 19th, 2019 9:09 PM Author: Blathering Round Eye
You're about to get on a plane to Seattle. You want to know if you should bring a raincoat. You call 3 random friends of yours who live there and ask each independently if it's raining. Each of your friends has a 2/3 chance of telling you the truth and a 1/3 chance of messing with you by lying. All 3 friends tell you that "Yes" it is raining. What is the probability that it's actually raining in Seattle?
A) 8/27
B) 26/27
C) 8/9
D) 1/27
Explain your reasoning along with your answer
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4181520&forum_id=2#37623215) |
Date: January 19th, 2019 9:21 PM Author: Underhanded Pungent Queen Of The Night
26/27
Easier to do it backwards and say what are the odds that all three are lying.
1/3 * 1/3 * 1/3 = 1/27
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4181520&forum_id=2#37623272)
|
Date: January 19th, 2019 9:50 PM Author: Laughsome Ape Karate
Haven't thought about it too long, but I think it's 8/9
Edit: There's 27 ways (combinations) they could answer the question.
They all said "yes". This can only happen if they're all telling the truth, or all lying.
There's 8/27 ways they could all be telling the truth (2/3 to the power of 3).
There's 1/27 ways they could all be lying (1/3 to the power of 3).
So of the 9 ways they could have all answered "yes", 8 have them telling the truth and 1 has them lying, therefore 8/9 chance of telling the truth.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4181520&forum_id=2#37623406) |
|
Date: January 20th, 2019 12:17 AM Author: Blathering Round Eye
i also thought 8/9 but the answer key says 26/27
I think the answer really depends on the phrasing of the question. and given that all 3 said "YES its raining" the probability that it is indeed raining is 1-probability they all lied. so it is 26/27
after thinking a little bit more i think 8/9 would be the answer if the question was phrased as "given that all 3 replied the same way what is the probability that it is raining". but the question asked here is different and explicitly says that all said YES
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4181520&forum_id=2#37624152) |
Date: January 20th, 2019 1:32 AM Author: passionate skinny woman
Haven’t read the thread yet.
You know that they’re either all lying (it’s not raining) or all telling the truth (it is raining).
Odds that they’re all lying are 1/27 (1/3^3).
Odds that they’re all telling the truth are 8/27 (2/3^3).
The other 18/27 possible states don’t matter.
So, 8 times out of 9, it’s raining.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4181520&forum_id=2#37624655) |
|
Date: January 20th, 2019 1:35 AM Author: passionate skinny woman
I wanted to read it first.
Fuck, now I see it depends on the base rate.
I haven’t thought about bayes rule in like 10 years.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4181520&forum_id=2#37624672) |
Date: January 20th, 2019 2:59 PM Author: magical private investor travel guidebook
Jfc lawboys
The only way it is NOT RAINIING is the 1/27 chance ALL OF THEM are fucking with you
Its like saying there you have three radars across Seattle. The radars are accurate 2 out of three times. You check the radars and they all indicate that it's raining. What is the probability it is raining in Seattle (in one part, the whole city, it doesn't matter)?
For it to be NOT RAINING all three radars have to be wrong.
Math major and this took me less than two seconds to think through op
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4181520&forum_id=2#37626940) |
|
Date: January 20th, 2019 3:14 PM Author: magical private investor travel guidebook
I did read the thread and you are splerging out. OP wanted an explanation of why answer key said D. You came in here mucking up the thread, confusing ppl, and citing uncessary shit. Classic law boy trying to outsmart the hypo
Can you even explain your reasoning?
I can't even believe this thread made it this far. This is literally some high school level shit
Edit: Im pretty sure the part that trips you and other law Boys up is that only one friend needs to be telling the truth, therefore, all of them have to be lying for it to be not raining
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4181520&forum_id=2#37627022) |
|
Date: January 20th, 2019 3:46 PM Author: Motley aqua kitchen
Do you understand Bayes rule?
There are two possibilities: it’s raining and they’re all telling the truth, or it’s not raining and they’re all lying. You must account for both.
Jfc and don’t you purportedly work in finance?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4181520&forum_id=2#37627262) |
|
Date: January 20th, 2019 4:09 PM Author: magical private investor travel guidebook
Trader and I don't consider my job "finance"
As OP said, this is a very simple probability question. You've shitted up the whole thread citing irrelevant shit and have somehow convinced yourself that the answer key is wrong along the way lol
What you said makes no sense
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4181520&forum_id=2#37627501) |
|
Date: January 20th, 2019 4:32 PM Author: magical private investor travel guidebook
Great response on stack exchange about this Q:
"Each of the above analyses fail to assess the logic of the question primarily in their approach. Since all three say it is raining, you cannot approach the solution by determining each friend's propensity for truth. For it not to be raining, they ALL must be lying. Therefore, the solution must be the inverse of the probability that all three are "messing with you." (1/3)x(1/3)x(1/3)=1/27 (3.7% chance they are all lying). Since there is only a 3.7% chance all three friends are messing with you, there is a 96.3% chance it is raining."
This is a great interview question because someone like me will be able to quickly determine the goal of the question, map my way to an answer and walk the interviewer through my process, and then explain my answer to contemplate any potential problems or shortcomings of my answer. Meanwhile, someone like you will be splerging out and flailing their arms about some irrelevant shit, scribbling down numbers and gook hyroglypbics on your paper, before telling the interviewer the Q can be answered after 15 minutes. Then you go home an admire your genius for "winning" the trick question
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4181520&forum_id=2#37627727) |
|
Date: January 20th, 2019 7:29 PM Author: Laughsome Ape Karate
1/27 is the probability that you poll them and they a) all say it's raining and b) it turns out it's not raining.
Given they all said it's raining, the range of possible situations changes from 27 to 9, and in 8 of them Seattle is raining.
(This all assumes the probability of raining/not raining is 50/50)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4181520&forum_id=2#37629051) |
|
Date: January 20th, 2019 3:07 PM Author: Motley aqua kitchen
Date: January 20th, 2019 2:59 PM
Author: Mormon missionary (only posts on WSHH and xo)
Jfc lawboys
The only way it is NOT RAINIING is the 1/27 chance ALL OF THEM are fucking with you
Its like saying there you have three radars across Seattle. The radars are accurate 2 out of three times. You check the radars and they all indicate that it's raining. What is the probability it is raining in Seattle (in one part, the whole city, it doesn't matter)?
For it to be NOT RAINING all three radars have to be wrong.
Math major and this took me less than two seconds to think through op
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4181520&forum_id=2#37626983)
|
|
|