First trade, then technology -- now talent. The Trump administration has started taking aim at China’s best and brightest in the U.S., scrutinizing researchers with ties to Beijing and restricting student visas.

Several Chinese graduate students and academics told Bloomberg News in recent weeks that they found the U.S. academic and job environment increasingly unfriendly. Emory University dismissed two Chinese-American professors on May 16, and China’s Education Ministry issued a warning Monday on the risks of studying in the U.S. as student visa rejections soar.

“I’m nervous, worried, even saddened by the unnecessary conflict,” said Liu Yuanli, founding director of the Harvard School of Public Health’s China Initiative and now serves as dean of Peking Union Medical College’s School of Public Health in Beijing. “The restrictions on Chinese scholars and students are irrational and go against the very core value that makes U.S. a great nation.”

Liu is a participant in China’s controversial “Thousand Talents” recruitment program, which began in 2008 as a way for Beijing to encourage its brightest citizens abroad to help develop the economy back home. More recently, China has sought to play down the program as U.S. concerns about its activities grow.

Increasing Suspicion

The developments underscore how the trade conflict is fundamentally changing the relationship between to the world’s two largest economies, from one of greater reliance to increasing suspicion. President Donald Trump’s expanding curbs on Chinese goods and China’s move to set up a sweeping blacklist of “unreliable” foreign entities since their trade talks broke down have helped fuel new Wall Street warnings about a possible global recession.

Education has for decades been a strong point of cooperation between the nations, with a surge of Chinese students filling American university coffers while giving the country access to some of the world’s best research hubs. The U.S. hosted more than 360,000 students from China last year, according to a report by the Institute of International Education, more than any other country.

Still, growth has slowed amid the trade tensions, with the number of students rising 3.6% last year -- or roughly half the pace of the previous year. The share of Chinese government-sponsored students refused visas increased to 13.5% in the first three months of this year, compared with 3.2% in the same period of 2018, according to new Chinese government data.

Slower Renewals

Annual student visa renewals, which previously took about three weeks, are now dragging on for months, according to several Chinese doctorate candidates at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who asked not to be named over concerns their career prospects could be affected. One of the students said they were leaning toward returning home after graduation, worried that the scrutiny of Chinese scholars could continue for years.

“The actions of the U.S. side are causing a chill in China-U.S. educational exchanges and cooperation,” Xu Yongji, deputy director of the Education Ministry’s Department of International Cooperation and Exchange told a briefing Monday in Beijing. “We hope that the U.S. side will correct its wrong practices as soon as possible, take a more positive attitude, do more things conducive to promoting bilateral educational exchanges and cooperation.”

The ministry criticized what it said were groundless U.S. accusations of “non-traditional espionage activities.” The ministry cautioned Chinese students about the risks of pursuing an American education only to be denied entry far into the process, an message that highlights a change in attitude in Beijing even if it won’t actively curb applications.

“Those in the U.S. who are blocking Chinese students and scholars have another agenda in mind: They are afraid that the Chinese will master advanced technology and that China will walk to the front,” the Communist Party’s flagship newspaper, the People’s Daily, said in a Tuesday commentary. “A precipitous drop in the number of Chinese students studying in the U.S. would certainly send shock waves through the American education industry.”

The U.S. State Department didn’t immediately respond Monday to a request for comment.

Researchers Fired

The worries have persisted despite progress claimed by China after President Xi Jinping discussed the issue with Trump during their summit on the sidelines of the Group of 20 meetings in Argentina last year. Although Chinese state media said Trump reaffirmed U.S. desire for the country’s students, the White House mentioned no agreements on the issue.

The Trump administration vowed in its 2017 National Security Strategy to review visa procedures and consider restrictions on foreign science, technology, engineering and mathematics -- or STEM -- students from designated countries to ensure that intellectual property is not transferred to competitors. Last June, the U.S. State Department said it would limit the visas for Chinese students studying science and engineering.

Those moves have been followed by actions by U.S. universities such as Emory, where one fired genetics researcher, Li Xiao-Jiang, was a Thousand Talents participant. In April, three researchers were also let go by the University of Texas’s M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in connection with an investigation into possible foreign attempts to take advantage of its federally funded research.

Some have pushed back against the trend, including Yale University President Peter Salovey, who affirmed the school’s “steadfast commitment” to foreign talent in a May 23 open letter. China’s foreign ministry backed his stance, saying personnel and cultural exchanges between the two countries “should not be politicized.”

Returning Talent

While the student visa squeeze may help protect U.S. research, it could also accelerate the return of Chinese scholars. One of China’s top schools, Jinan University, pledged to take in Emory’s Li and his lab staff and Chinese companies are eager to poach the employees of their Silicon Valley peers.

“Of course we are happy to bring them in, if those are the ones we need,” Ren Zhengfei, the founder of Huawei Technologies Co., told Bloomberg last week.

Xi has repeatedly called for “indigenous innovation” in core technologies since taking power in 2012, and the country has sped up reforms in higher education. The U.S. ranked sixth on the 2018 Global Innovation Index released by institutions including Cornell University and INSEAD, ahead of No. 17 China.

“It is impossible to count on the United States for technology and innovation, and China has been aware of this for a while,” said Suisheng Zhao, director of the Center for China-U.S. Cooperation at the University of Denver’s Josef Korbel School of International Studies. “China has no better option than self-reliance to develop its own high-tech talent.”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4275829&forum_id=2#38335821)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4275829&forum_id=2#38335859)

why would a chinese student sponsored by the CCP be loyal to the US?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4275829&forum_id=2#38336299)

if we kick them out, china will have it but the US won't

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4275829&forum_id=2#38337484)

The undergrads are mostly harmless cash cows who don’t have access to much sensitive stuff, other than being culturally annoying and crowding things up. The profs are mostly paid well and thus want to stay.

But grad students and postdocs have their fingers in everything the profs do, except they are paid poorly and in inherently temporary positions. And there are vast quantities.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4275829&forum_id=2#38347476)

MAGA!!!!!!!!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4275829&forum_id=2#38335875)

Many are double agents and selling academic related patent trade secrets to China and Israel who have their own backdoor channel of pilfering USA tech subsidized by low IQ goy cattle

I poasted about it a year or more ago

Sup NSA/Alphabet agency fagmos!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4275829&forum_id=2#38335996)

There's no good answer to who should rightfully infiltrate this "Country" but tbf the Jews came here with the original freemasons like rats on a ship and have setup shop whereas the Chinese lack the millenia of agile, rootless and parasitic finesse of the Semite - hence why they consolidate power in their rather static region for, well, since humanity's existence.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4275829&forum_id=2#38336083)

really makes you think - how the fuck did it even get this bad? what on earth were boomers doing for the past 30 years while this shit went down? hello boomers?!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4275829&forum_id=2#38336090)

*bangs gong*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4275829&forum_id=2#38336093)

Good thing you already self-deported

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4275829&forum_id=2#38336556)

Frankly, I'm surprised Dems aren't more interested in working with Trump on going after China. Aside from China generally being a threat to the US, their human rights violations, exceptionally poor record on the environment and worker safety, and propensity to buy US assets and steal US jobs (thus harming the more needy Americans most) are things that should horrify most Dems.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4275829&forum_id=2#38337011)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4275829&forum_id=2#38337192)

One of the biggest issues the US is going to face in the future is the combination of a multi-ethnic society and a two-party system. So long as minorities constantly vote their race, there will be a lot of issues that have broad popular support but never get addressed.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4275829&forum_id=2#38337236)