He is riding a wave of wonderful luck right now, where what once seemed like an unimportant topic about unassailable libs (dei academics) suddenly attracted high-powered allies due to zionism. This will pass and Karl has only a moment to ride this wave on to lasting recognition

He desperately needs to open his ears to xo's criticism, even if it has come with personal attacks, etc.

His shit is way too long, way too verbose, unpleasant to see on the screen. It needs to be cut in half, at least. If he writes 500 words and then, as here, types, "Okay let's begin", all kinds of sirens should go off.

He has multiple citations that stretch four paragraphs, five inches on a big screen, and multiple scrolls on mobile. Imagine scrolling on a phone and having to push three times to get past a long citation?

He jams in images, gifs, memes, graphs, youtube videos... just a fucking dumpster of catch-all shit, expanding the size of the rant. It looks exactly like Anglin shit.

One paragraph might have 4 or 5 hyperlinks, with language like *Here* and *here* and *here*.

As a very newcomer, he's badly misled to think someone will spend 60 minutes on his pieces, following all the links, getting to the bottom of thousands of words.

He can maek it! But he needs to learn how to communicate on a screen, how to POAST, which ironically should be his greatest talent coming off of xo into IRL journalism

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5472458&forum_id=2#47262389)

Like this Schopenhauer quote you use:

The nobler and more perfect a thing is, the later and slower it is in arriving at maturity. A man reaches the maturity of his reasoning powers and mental faculties hardly before the age of twenty−eight; a woman at eighteen. And then, too, in the case of woman, it is only reason of a sort—very niggard in its dimensions. That is why women remain children their whole life long; never seeing anything but what is quite close to them, cleaving to the present moment, taking appearance for reality, and preferring trifles to matters of the first importance. For it is by virtue of his reasoning faculty that man does not live in the present only, like the brute, but looks about him and considers the past and the future;

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5472458&forum_id=2#47262902)

<<<<<<>>< <<<>>>>>>>><<<<<<>>>> >><<<>>>>><<<< >>>

```There is a balance between man's burden of guilt and the burden of labor and toil imposed on him. A similar balance is found between woman's wantonness, her inborn capacity for karmic burdening, and the measure of femininity which this world offers in temptation. In a world of humble acceptance of given karma there would be no women. But again such a world would serve no purpose; the wantonness of this world is inseparably bound up with its continued existence and its sufferance of womanhood and, amazingly, the latter are also empirically found to be inseparable. It is a particularly strong case of the different, ever conflicting, and irreconcilable interests in this world of plurality: man must shun and ignore woman in order to avoid increasing the burden of his karma and his own ultimate downfall—listen to Shakespeare's Antony under the spell of Cleopatra, crying out in desperation, "I must from this enchanting queen break off"—and woman cannot exist without man, her whole karma is nothing but her sex, so much so that between a woman and a lioness there is less difference than between twin brothers.

Woman must live in a world where she feels everything but cannot be anything. In her body she experiences the feelings of humanity, of race and family, but she may not indulge in them. Only one thing is left to her: one who is her ideal, one whom she may follow with her eyes without asking of him anything for herself, no love in return, not even being noticed by him. She is to be an instrument, sent from heaven to loosen the bonds of his karma and help him keep away from disturbing temptation. But in doing so she does not notice that her entrance into his life becomes his greatest temptation, when he begins to feel an all-giving love toward her. In her consciousness, in her attention she helps him live his life purely in himself, but underneath, from the dark depths of her sex she will lure him onto paths which lead him to ruin.```

Brouwer, Luitzen Egbertus Jan. "Life, Art, and Mysticism." Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 37.3, 389, 407 (1996) (v. Stigt, WP, trans.).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5472458&forum_id=2#47267551)