RESHMA KAMATH thinks that JUDGE WILLIAM ALSUP needs to take accountability and onus for the alleged “snafus” (William Alsup’s Order re Dkt. 425) of his own staff and judges. Because William Alsup cannot think outside of his racial bias, he has take it upon himself to constantly attack via his Orders Counsel RESHMA KAMATH for no fault of her own.

Clearly, it was JAMES LI and his staff who made the error. It is their appeal – and they more than obviated their fault in not noticing opposing Counsel of the appealed documents.

RESHMA KAMATH will ensure that the parties who filed the appeal fix their error of notice and service. If there is no notice from the other side of their appellate filings, then the lawsuit that RESHMA KAMATH was to file will be further amended to reflect such and other racist behavior at CAND. Racism is quite different in the year 2023 than it was in the pre-Civil Rights Era – but it is there.

Since WILLIAM ALSUP has made it more and more obvious that he is a typical White guy via his word choice, conduct, way of thinking, and related aspects of his overall demeanor, WILLIAM ALSUP also knows when to make that jurisdictional argument that the matter is on appeal, and when to be racist blatantly and invidiously. Judge ALSUP and his staff very well know which side the White attorneys are on, and rule accordingly.

Now, RESHMA KAMATH, is absolutely a hundred percent sure that the judges at CAND demonstrate racial bias and prejudice; they overlook the blatant errors on the side where the White attorneys’ and their staff are; and, they use law as a discriminatory pre-text to promote racial/gender bias.

As Counsel prior stated, people can be nice to certain ethnic groups, but they can demonstrate hate and racial bias to other groups, such as WILLIAM ALSUP is demonstrating. The new groups to attack in America are now Middle-Eastern people and Indians for the past two decades. JUDGE WILLIAM ALSUP clearly lost his ability to remain neutral and impartial post-trial after he saw an Indian woman sole practitioner winning a unanimous jury verdict.

The Kyle-Rittenhouse syndrome that Judges such as WILLIAM ALSUP demonstrate at CAND and other courthouses in California is more than appalling – and it is reflective of how the American society is deteriorating each day.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47509305)

PLAINTIFF RESHMA KAMATH requests this HONORABLE COURT to re-assign the matter both from the DISTRICT JUDGE, as well as the MAGISTRATE

JUDGE – both presumedly White, Male Individuals to other Judges of Color. Since there are racial and gender issues involved in this matter, PLAINTIFF thinks that justice would be better administered and served should non-White judicial officers preside over this above-captioned case. Not that judges of color are any more tolerant and neutral, they are very well biased and prejudicial. However, White, Male judicial officers have historically demonstrated that they cannot remain neutral with immigrants, and women of color. Thus, Plaintiff cannot take a chance. Plaintiff thinks the White, Male officers would be more likely to dismiss this case without litigation – whereas, even at this point, a judge of color may take offense, meet-and-confer with

prior judicial officers; and do the same. (Because California courts more or less lack integrity). Moreover, since White/Caucasian individuals often have trouble reading Asian-Americans/Latin-Americans, and disproportionately rule in favor of White attorneys/individuals, PLAINTIFF does not think this matter will be properly adjudicated. Any and all defendants will be served shortly if re-assignment occurs.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47509315)

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67911546/27/reshma-kamath-v-the-superior-court-of-california-county-of-los-angeles/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47509319)

ljl at this bitch

https://twitter.com/ReshmaKamath10

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47509322)

Seoul Nat'l Univ. MA High Hon.

Univ. KwaZulu Natal

San Jose State Univ. Summa Cum Laude

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47545672)

indians never cease to amaze me

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47558617)

https://ballotpedia.org/Thomas_Hixson

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47509332)

Credible and Trusted

Lawyer You Can

Rely On™

https://myinstalawyer.com/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47509334)

she went to fucking northwestern. she must be mentally ill and unemployable to be running her own shitlaw firm.

she also looks like an indian man who manages a 7-11

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47512608)

While the purpose of this letter is to open a dialogue between us, please be advised that we are prepared to take all actions necessary to protect our mark. You have infringed on our mark. You must cease and desist any use of the mark. Furthermore, you should sign the statement below certifying that you will cease using the mark. We recommend that you consult with an attorney before taking any action.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47512681)

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67911546/38/reshma-kamath-v-the-superior-court-of-california-county-of-los-angeles/

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67911546/27/reshma-kamath-v-the-superior-court-of-california-county-of-los-angeles/

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67911546/24/reshma-kamath-v-the-superior-court-of-california-county-of-los-angeles/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47510948)

https://myinstalawyer.com/legal-services-offered/ols/categories/general-counsel

Unfortunately I could not add this to my cart and check out. But don't worry, that option will be available soon.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47510986)

sued Coinbase cause 35k of bitcoin went "missing"

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12578416626187733272&q=RESHMA+KAMATH&hl=en&as_sdt=2006

sued DHS and SF for towing her vehicle

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4800838916217866734&q=RESHMA+KAMATH&hl=en&as_sdt=2006

referred to standing committe on professional conduct by judge HANDSOME she accused of harassment

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14622696784403707144&q=RESHMA+KAMATH&hl=en&as_sdt=2006

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47512307)

In addition, Herrera's counsel, Reshma Kamath (Kamath), is ordered to pay monetary sanctions to Czech in the amount of $1,440 and to the court in the amount of $5,000. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.276.)[2]

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13200589203889740368&q=RESHMA+KAMATH&hl=en&as_sdt=2006

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47512628)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47512659)

Yes and it we like that way. Fuck off bitch

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47513852)

culture seems very civil, professional, mature and quiet, but if one observes the

patterns that White culture embodies - those traits, norms and conduct become

particular to White culture – as there are traits, norms and conduct that are particular to, e.g., Indian culture. Whether traits, norms and conduct are particular to White American culture is a whole different discussion. Judges must be aware that they’re constantly promoting White American culture and male culture at the courthouses.

- Ever since Plaintiff entered the overwhelming White profession of law in

America, this has become more evident. White people always justify other White people, in breaking the law, violating the law, treat White people as special and different than others when it comes to the law, and allow other White people to cut corners even when there is black letter law. People of color allow White people, mostly White women, to do this freely.

- Plaintiff wants to ensure that Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley, who seems very

mild, but part of the same White American culture, is aware of this while she

promulgates.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47513867)

Reshma Kamath, In Propria Persona, has reviewed the racially misogynistic order devoid of merit and substance that Magistrate Judge Susan Van Kalen issued on February 13, 2024.

The opinion-based statements bordering on misstatements, omissions, and falsified sentences - had someone other than a judicial officer made it, Plaintiff Reshma Kamath would have sued for defamation of Reshma Kamath and the Law Office of Reshma Kamath.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47516752)

https://ibb.co/wK4gnt8

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47524762)

I think feeling the need to include that in your filing is proof enough that it’s not actually well-thought.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47526791)

i filed a motion to strike one of their pleadings, and their response opened with "Defendant's Motion, while very well written, is wrong." this kind of reminds me of that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47527744)

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67059118/30/sidhu-v-wright/

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67059118/32/sidhu-v-wright/

Yet another racist, prejudicial and biased decision (Cal. Cod. Civ. Proc. Sections 170.1, 170.3, and 170.6 et seq.) from the California Courts. Without considering the exhibits, the pending motion to disqualify, promoting the majority populations of County of Kern, California such as majority 90% White and Latin populations, the federal court has dismissed the case without any meritorious hearing.

Provided that the slew of cases that Indians, and Indian-Americans have initiated get dismissed, with prejudicial decisions, without a trial, shows the promotion of the majority White culture against Indians and Indian-Americans.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47529827)

https://ibb.co/2N556kc

The justices RICHARD CLIFTON, a White/Caucasian justice; CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, a White/Caucasian woman maybe of Spanish ethnicity; and HOLLY THOMAS, an African-American woman justice, have demonstrated that they have to support White/Caucasian people/attorneys/judges, and/or deep-pocketed men in the United States. The racial injustice is so entrenched in the United States even up to the Ninth Circuit and Supreme Court, it is unbelievable.

The undersigned counsel has already sued the NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS as well JEFFREY S. WHITE for his racial bias to Indian-Americans/Muslims/Muslim-sounding names, and this will just add to the allegations.

Typical of American establishments – White people can walk in and out with the worst of arguments/non-arguments (the lack of opposition of four defendants’ White male attorneys and an untimely opposition of two White women attorneys), tiniest of ailments, and nonsensical of problems, literally do nothing – and even then, extreme amounts of weight and credibility is given to them. For people of color without deep pockets, who have genuine issues, all the White people and people of color in power will come together in solidarity to nullify them – until something much more drastic occurs such as a death (racial deaths occurring daily in the United States of countless people of color for racism), or life-altering situation(s), that shock the human core.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47531871)

https://ibb.co/HT7GTyC

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Appellant’s counsel had researched during the prior week that all three judges, CLIFTON, CALLAHAN and WHITE are all Bush appointees. They’re promoting their Republican, Red agenda of anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim and pro-White, except when they have to laden their pockets, get their work done because no other labor will do the work, or in that rare occasion to make themselves look good. Such judges irrespective of political affiliation, and color are known to provide a guilt-free pass to White people, particularly to White women. No matter what they do, judges will excuse them – no matter how violative of law it is or how non-code-compliant it is.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47531875)

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68095770/15/kamath-v-alsup/

Small things – seemingly discarded by White judges as innocent mistakes of other White and non-White people are what comprise racism and misogyny. White judges are also constantly oblivious and confused when women of color talk, and the perceptions of men/other cultures/other ethnicities towards other genders/cultures/ ethnicities other than their own are often distorted. Particularly racist and misogynistic is when White judges such as Defendants Hixson and Alsup know the facts and ignore the facts when White women/people are at fault, is racist and misogynistic. Book knowledge, fancy degrees, and judicial experience that could be prideful make no difference in this context because ultimately the judges are human. Moreover, when the White/non-White judges know the entirety of the law, but only address part of the law - that denotes racism and misogyny.Racist White culture has permeated so deeply in California because even the non-White judges are appointed by heteronormative White men. For example, Defendant Alsup has trouble reading women of color, particularly immigrants and Asian/Middle-Eastern women.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47539527)

The reasons why racism, misogyny and White culture took over this case:

- Racist Alexandra Whitworth, a White woman, knew she could use her White prowess anywhere. That is both her White prowess ethnically and her skin-tone. Racist Alexandra displayed this cunningly as White women do always escaping from any harm or any liability for misrepresentations as White men and men unflinchingly support misogynistic White women. …

- Racist Alexandra knows, as White women know, that men and men of color will lap like dogs to a White woman’s instructions.

- For the months leading up to the motion racist Alexandra filed, racist Alexandra and her team of other racist White women pretended they would work together with Plaintiff Reshma Kamath….

- The reason why racist Breyer is racist is – similar to other racist White judges, racist Breyer thinks because he hired some women of color as his staff members that he is somehow not racist. (Slavery, Colonization, and Apartheid had plenty of non-White women/people working for White people)….

- When Indian-Americans/Muslim-Americans appear before racist White Breyer or racist White White (no pun intended) – seems the latter is as honest as his name is – racially prejudiced, they find reasons to chime in with their White counter-parts….

- If Plaintiff Reshma Kamath’s money is not returned to her before the end of this litigation, then CAND better watch out – anyway racist Breyer will be named as a defendant in a lawsuit. …

- These kinds of trashy White people in the courts have ruined the lives of countless people of color, women of color, and families of color – some ending up in prison, some homeless and others dead. American history is witness to this – past and present.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47545056)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47545070)

“men and men of color will lap like dogs to a White woman’s instructions”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47555881)

A clerk does not need to put falsified statements on the docket such as no proposed order when it was submitted properly per Standing Order instructions.ECF Dkt. No. 37.

The clerk and the court know very well that most of the statements the clerk made and that the court reinforced are false.

Counsel does not want to demonstrate that in this case the judges/staff are biased as most courtrooms in California are. Counsel prefers to litigate on the merits. White people and people from other ethnicities/cultures within the courtrooms should not just assume things about litigants/counsel from other cultures/ethnicities when they’re (former) the ones making mistakes.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47545058)

Pretty obvious this is racism. …

Shubb’s Racism was pretty clear from the outset – thus, undersigned counsel knew that no matter what counsel does, Racist Shubb will rule this way eventually.

Plaintiff’s argument were far more superior in-person and in writing that the Defendants’ rubbish.

The more you promote White attorneys and display racism against Indians/Indian-Americans, the worse the California courts will go deeper into the toilets.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47545061)

Shubb such as many other racist White judges for their cruelty, archaic thinking and utter garbage rulings will all be displayed for the world to see. Such judges must be publicly reprimanded. To think this kind of behavior is on-going in the courts with the CJP and State Bar sitting and staring blind-eyed is a joke to say the least….

Shubb also showed that he actually is idiotic in not knowing the law – he actually stated he doesn’t get the Equal Protection theory of one-person class.

Shubb said one most accurate thing to Reshma Kamath: “maybe you’re smarter than me.” At least he got one tiny thing right.

Too bad Shubb’s ego took over his common sense.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47545063)

Whenever Shana Hewitt, the White attorney for Defendants wanted an extension, Shubb caved in each time for White females. Shubb is just ugly inside out.

When women of color at the same level ask for it, Shubb comes back with his racist misogynistic display as a revenge tactic. Shame on such third-rate judges.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47545065)

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68029863/15/reshma-kamath-v-judith-ashmann-gerst/

Here are the highlights:

1. DEFENDANT WILLIAM D. STEWART is the defendant in this matter, and a judicial officer in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.

30. DEFENDANT STEWART is demeaning of women of color who’re intelligent and driven. DEFENDANT STEWART displays anger and racial animus towards women of color who have any intelligent statements against the way he thinks. DEFENDANT STEWART is a predator towards women of color who’re alone without a male overseeing her where he can abuse such women.

57. It is undisputed that DEFENDANT STEWART said, “SHUT UP SHUT YOUR MOUTH” “SHUT UP SHUT YOUR MOUTH” to PLAINTIFF RESHMA KAMATH.

61. It is undisputed that DEFENDANT STEWART put PLAINTIFF RESHMA KAMATH’s life and security in physical danger, because of DEFENDANT STEWART’s recalcitrance that PLAINTIFF RESHMA KAMATH must appear in-person from Arizona to Los Angeles to “apologize” to him in-person for a n under five-minute appearance.

62. It is undisputed that DEFENDANT STEWART put PLAINTIFF RESHMA KAMATH’s life and security in physical danger, because PLAINTIFF RESHMA KAMATH had to take an overnight AMTRAK – and because that AMTRAK got canceled at 9 P.M. from Yuma, Arizona, PLAINTFF RESHMA KAMATH had to literally hitchhike from an opportune Uber driver and his friend [complete strangers to PLAINTIFF], all-night sleeping in their SUV backseat and paying them over $1,000 for DEFENDANT STEWART’s abuse.

63. DEFENDANT STEWART’s sexually-provocative, pornographic-like words, such as “SHUT YOUR MOUTH” repeatedly toward PLAINTIFF RESHMA KAMATH during a hearing are unacceptable.

64. DEFENDANT STEWART’s Taliban-style judiciousness and his treatment of women of color who’re educated and intelligent as lesser, more masculine, and to demean them with such as toward PLAINTIFF RESHMA KAMATH is unacceptable.

74. DEFENDANT SCHULTZ struck the form, because DEFENDANT SCHULTZ has that Bro-code towards light-skinned men such as DEFENDANT MEDIONI.

77. DEFENDANT SCHULTZ and DEFENDANT STEWART are no different than those who lived during colonization, slavery, and/or apartheid who had hired people of color in subordinate roles, and claimed that their work was grounded in the law.

98. Allegedly, some White guy was knocking on the door of PLAINTIFF’s parents’ home at different times of the day very loud and using profanity also loud over three weeks during the Hindu cultural festival of DIWALI.

99. PLAINTIFF’s senior citizen parents in their mid-sixties and seventies would think this was some FedEx delivery person – but upon repeated knocks – would venture out from the third-floor. When they would get to the door, there would be no one there. This kind of harassment that DEFENDANTS SCHULTZ, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF and WILLIAM JUN caused demonstrates the HEIGHTENED RACIAL MISOGYNY of the LA COURTS.

107. Since DEFENDANTS SCHULTZ, STEWART, JUN and related did not think how their CONDUCT, and LACK THEREOF has an impact on a budding, female attorney of color, similarly, now PLAINTIFF has no remorse in ensuing litigation against any of these DEFENDANTS whether they retired, had glorious careers, based on their age.

108. When the DEFENDANTS have no guilt in defamation and their insolent, angry conduct, then there is no reason for PLAINTIFF to refrain from litigating against them in a court of law with legal mechanisms.

109. Defendants JUDITH ASHMANN-GERST and MARIE E. STRATTON have taken the lead in civilizing the only person of color counsel, Plaintiff RESHMA KAMATH.

110. In response to Defendant Judith’s comment about an “unintelligible” opening brief, Defendant JUDITH may be lacking melanin making her particularly CRUEL, RUTHLESS, and MALIGNANT displaying White cultural traits. Just because Defendant JUDITH is an idiotic character, does not mean others are “unintelligible”.

114. Delusion is the least word to describe Defendants JUDITH, ELWOOD, MARIE and other pro-White compatriots on the bench.

115. [STATE-COURT DEFENDANTS] Defendant BARBARA ANN MEIERS has taken a particular PREDATORY approach as White women often do – with the White woman’s hatred and scorn in weaving a masterful story against persons of color she meets in her courtroom when Defendant BARBARA sees them alone with a Male or White person. Defendant MEIERS can boast she has Latin-American law clerk supporting her. What she forgets is they’re majority in California, and extremely misogynistic. Defendant MEIERS is a vicious predator who likes to attack immigrants of color when she finds them alone or helpless.

116. Defendant ROLF M. TREU has demonstrated that he can be the KLAN leader when he wants to with his fellow White male attorneys. Defendant TREU has hired an African-American similar to Defendant SCHULTZ. What they forget is during apartheid, colonization and slavery, all the WHITE MASTERS had non-White subservient workers. Defendants TREU and SCHULTZ cannot accept an equal or better woman than them who comes from another culture or an ethnic background that they have rarely or ever interacted with. Having an Indian doctor doesn’t count. Mentioning they go to an Indian doctor doesn’t count.

119. In an educational amended complaint, Plaintiff RESHMA KAMATH will teach these RACIST WHITES what is means to display WHITE RACISM.

xi. After two hundred years of slavery, WHITE PEOPLE now thinking that BLM is politically correct thus WHITE PEOPLE demonstrating extra niceties to African-Americans while continuing to demonstrate racial prejudice to other racial groups.

157. DEFENDANT ELWOOD LIU, as many people of color, and East-Asian ethno- demographic individuals, usually support White/Caucasian attorneys.

158. DEFENDANT ELWOOD LIU called PLAINTIFF RESHMA KAMATH “dense” to DEFENDANT MELISSA REAL who is a non-attorney, and non- Juris Doctor; and the DEFENDANTS started laughing.

159. It is undisputed that DEFENDANT ELWOOD LIU, in writing, called Plaintiff RESHMA KAMATH “SLOW” “DELAYED” while Plaintiff RESHMA KAMATH sought an extension of time in a properly-filed application for extension of time.

171. DEFENDANT ASHMANN-GERST has riled up as a White woman – as they usually do – both White men, and men of color, in DEFENDANT ASHMANN GERST’s wild accusations of people of color.

172. DEFENDANT ASHMANN GERST, as a White woman, got DEFENDANT ELWOOD-LIU, and another White guy, HOFFSTADT, to rally in on her White mob-mentality with JUDGE MARIE E. STRATTON.

173. DEFENDANT ASHMANN-GERST has used words like “conspiracies” in describing Plaintiff RESHMA KAMATH.

175. DEFENDANT ASHMANN-GERST may boast that she interviewed an African-American judge once, but that does not mean DEFENDANT ASHMANN-GERST is puritanical. Probably did this to look good. Both Defendant ASHMANN-GERST and Defendant STRATTON were highly-privileged coddled by fathers, husbands and other men.

181. DEFENDANT MARIE E. STRATTON and DEFENDANT ASHMANN- GERST both cannot stand another woman of color sole practitioner thrive, because their pro-White attitude won’t comport with this kind of promotion of women of color without their White boys.

182. DEFENDANT MARIE E. STRATTON and DEFENDANT ASHMANN- GERST are in the cohort of wives, mothers, and grand-mothers, whose sons and grandsons are picking up guns in America and shooting innocent people of color, and people in general without thinking.

183. It is sad that Plaintiff RESHMA KAMATH has to deal with such small-minded, bigots, such as DEFENDANT MARIE E. STRATTON and DEFENDANT ASHMANN-GERST.

199. DEFENDANT ELWOOD LIU and DEFENDANT ASHMANN GERST have DEFAMED Plaintiff RESHMA KAMATH in falsely stating Plaintiff RESHMA KAMATH was making anti-Israel comments to an opposing attorney who is Jewish in ethnic backgrounds. This is personal and professional SLANDER against Plaintiff RESHMA KAMATH.

200. DEFENDANT ELWOOD LIU and DEFENDANT ASHMANN GERST have DEFAMED Plaintiff RESHMA KAMATH in falsely stating “hezbollah” and “hamas” to Plaintiff RESHMA KAMATH. This is personal and professional SLANDER against Plaintiff RESHMA KAMATH.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47555172)

https://ibb.co/QChrhqq

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47585285)

DEFENSE COUNSEL RESHMA KAMATH is worried such behavior will continue during the case and into trial prejudicing the litigants, GANGYOU WANG, RUIFENG BIZTECH, INC., ALAN LI AND RF BIOTECH LLC.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that PLAINTIFF QUINTARA’s attorney MISLED the COURT. While it states RICHARD LAMBERT, the attorney who attorney who appeared ON SCREEN, was NOT RICHARD LAMBERT. It was another attorney DANIEL PETERSON – who had RICHARD LAMBERT’s name on MS-TEAMS. Such behavior is a FRAUD ON THE COURT FROM PLAINTIFF QUINTARA AND ITS ATTORNEYS, DANIEL PETERSON AND RICHARD LAMBERT WHO’RE APPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE LAW FIRM, LILAW, INC. OF ATTORNEY JAMES LI.

DEFENSE RESHMA KAMATH recognizes DANIEL PETERSON from the FEDERAL COURT CAND case where RESHMA KAMATH won an eight-person jury verdict.

If such behavior continues from the judge or the Plaintiff Quintara’s attorneys, defense counsel RESHMA KAMATH will file a lawsuit against the court.

PLEASE TAKE FINAL NOTICE that defense counsel RESHMA KAMATH will be filing an attorney misconduct complaint against the stated attorneys pursuant to RESHMA KAMATH’s professional responsibility and ethical duties as counsel.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47585296)

Luckily she’s ham handed about it so most people won’t take her seriously. But I think we could both imagine someone that is just as disingenuous but better at this really ruining people’s lives over this type of frivolous accusation, borne from the liberal agenda of hyper focus on race.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5506512&forum_id=2#47599728)