The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Why is textual child porn legal if visual child porn is illegal?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 27th, 2024 5:45 PM Author: Electric alcoholic school There are literotica stories all over the internet mostly written by women where they write fantasies or recount stories about getting raped by their brothers and fathers and uncles as teens and sometimes younger. Why is this not a chargeable offense like nudes and videos? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47532801) |
Date: March 27th, 2024 5:48 PM Author: concupiscible iridescent laser beams because one is real and the other is fiction (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47532810) |
 |
Date: March 27th, 2024 5:57 PM Author: Electric alcoholic school what if people use AI to make ultra real visual child porn? seems like it would still be banned under the same laws that make it illegal to possess and peddle real ones (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47532833) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 5:58 PM Author: concupiscible iridescent laser beams what are the relevant statutes ? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47532838) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 6:00 PM Author: Electric alcoholic school I don’t but sick pedo freaks get no leeway under the laws as they are written (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47532844) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 6:28 PM Author: fragrant knife Good (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47532950) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2024 12:41 PM Author: contagious twisted cruise ship mexican I'm not sure that's true. IIRC, if you create a drawing that isn't CP, same as AI generated content but I'm not bored enough to actually research this rn. Also, if an 18 year old goes and says "I'm a 12 year old middle schooler, my gym teacher is going to fuck me" - also not cp. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47534842) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 7:06 PM Author: fragrant knife Blame that fucking Ragu eater I’m serious SC judge Catholicism is ethical poison (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47533075) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 9:26 PM Author: Burgundy big-titted boistinker Surely the government will use more censorship powers wisely and justly, not sure why Scalia was so against banning this largely irrelevant bad thing (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47533595) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 7:09 PM Author: exciting party of the first part no it would be legal, in fact John Ashcroft took this issue to court during the Bush Administration and got assfucked by the 1st Amendment
every case where someone's arrested for CP and they have simulated CP and lolicon on their computer, that stuff is just tacked on to make them look more evil; they're always getting arrested for ACTUAL CP |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 7:27 PM Author: fragrant knife For anyone here posting fantasy SP pedo shit I think that’s a distinction without a difference. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47533144) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 10:25 PM Author: exciting party of the first part I don't know what SP is but I'm guessing it's South Park (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47533732) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2024 12:17 AM Author: jet parlor The court results / statutes on this are inconsistent iirc (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47534043) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 5:51 PM Author: Arousing Sapphire Forum because no children were involved, which is why AI kiddie porn will be totally cool (and legal). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47532815) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 5:57 PM Author: Electric alcoholic school There’s no way that will be allowed especially if it’s impossible to tell the difference (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47532834) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 6:31 PM Author: fragrant knife It’s allowed now. Trump has been bought on this issue. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47532956) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 7:10 PM Author: exciting party of the first part it's already ubiquitous on 4chan and has been for like a year (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47533085) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 7:21 PM Author: fragrant knife It will get busted soon enough. Once we realize pedophiles should die. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47533120) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 10:29 PM Author: exciting party of the first part > if it’s impossible to tell the difference
the fucked up thing that currently juries are allowed to look at a pic and say "yeah that's a kid" and convict |
|
Date: March 28th, 2024 12:22 AM Author: jet parlor I’m pretty sure some states have laws against computer generated CP (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47534057) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 6:28 PM Author: fragrant knife There’s legal and there’s violations of private commercial standards. One can find a site in Russia if you don’t care about being a patriot. Good luck with current legislation on that point. And then there’s grooming. |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 6:59 PM Author: plum geriatric church building indirect expression (pedophilia caselaw expert) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47533040) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 7:05 PM Author: fragrant knife Yes I am plagued by projecting pedos I had no idea people are so fhcking crazy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47533068) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 7:01 PM Author: Brass Point is it "legal" to purchase an asian child, traffic him back to the united states, and repeatedly rape him while bragging about it on the internet? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47533047) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 7:05 PM Author: concupiscible iridescent laser beams legal? they give you a tax credit. sick society (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47533067) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 7:07 PM Author: fragrant knife It is not. Only a retarded pedophile would think otherwise. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47533077) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 7:30 PM Author: unholy stirring ticket booth Is it legal? It should not be (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47533154) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 7:32 PM Author: fragrant knife I agree with you. It is legal per se. But that is different from the question of whether it violates a private company’s policies. |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 7:47 PM Author: histrionic gaming laptop Wtf are you sick freaks talking about. ANY depictions including fakes are illegal. There was a case some years back of a guy who had DRAWN cp and just had it in his house, and he was locked up. No different than pics. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47533220) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 10:32 PM Author: exciting party of the first part there's literally a supreme court case called Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition that specifically held that fake CP is legal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47533748) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 11:00 PM Author: fragrant knife You aren’t helping (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47533832) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2024 12:09 AM Author: exciting party of the first part giving people the truth is by definition helping (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47534017) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 11:07 PM Author: histrionic gaming laptop Sorry bro ur done here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_Act_of_2003 |
|
Date: March 28th, 2024 12:09 AM Author: exciting party of the first part read your own link
> the court did not reverse its holding in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition as to virtual child pornography which is not obscene under the Miller standard. [27] |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 9:11 PM Author: Puce menage wagecucks Why does SP know so much about CP ITT? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47533534) |
|
Date: March 27th, 2024 9:18 PM Author: titillating onyx native depressive SPACEPORN = RAPE SON CP (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47533563) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2024 12:29 AM Author: sexy aggressive parlour 🤯 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47534075) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2024 12:25 PM Author: concupiscible iridescent laser beams wild coincidence
|
|
Date: March 28th, 2024 12:54 PM Author: Fuchsia Crackhouse (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47534867) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2024 12:10 AM Author: Topaz Lascivious Theater Idiot Gas all jews (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47534021) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2024 4:05 PM Author: Hairraiser fortuitous meteor There isn't a constitutional distinction between visual and literary or between depictions of minors and adults. There is a distinction between acts and words (1A doesn't protect actual child abuse) and a distinction for obscenity. Literotica (like most porn) can potentially be prosecuted under state obscenity laws regardless of whether it is visual or literary, and regardles of whether it depicts minors. The law at issue in the Ashcroft case was too broad, and not limited to obscenity or other exceptions. SCOTUS gave the example of Romeo and Juliette or various movies that depict sex acts involving minors, but which don't fall under the obscenity exception to 1a. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5510087&forum_id=2#47535003) |