does court have personal jdx over out of state co. that contracts w instate co?
| Pink disturbing nibblets | 04/16/24 | | provocative blathering tattoo | 04/16/24 | | Pink disturbing nibblets | 04/16/24 | | sticky hairraiser haunted graveyard | 04/16/24 | | Vibrant Tank | 04/16/24 | | provocative blathering tattoo | 04/16/24 | | Vibrant Tank | 04/16/24 | | Pink disturbing nibblets | 04/16/24 | | Aromatic Alcoholic Chapel Partner | 04/16/24 | | Pink disturbing nibblets | 04/16/24 | | sticky hairraiser haunted graveyard | 04/16/24 | | Vibrant Tank | 04/16/24 | | Aromatic Alcoholic Chapel Partner | 04/16/24 | | Pink disturbing nibblets | 04/16/24 | | Vibrant Tank | 04/16/24 | | Pink disturbing nibblets | 04/16/24 | | Vibrant Tank | 04/16/24 | | domesticated soul-stirring personal credit line | 04/16/24 | | Pink disturbing nibblets | 04/16/24 | | Vibrant Tank | 04/16/24 | | Vibrant Tank | 04/16/24 | | Pink disturbing nibblets | 04/16/24 | | Vibrant Tank | 04/16/24 | | Pink disturbing nibblets | 04/16/24 | | domesticated soul-stirring personal credit line | 04/16/24 | | domesticated soul-stirring personal credit line | 04/16/24 | | sick fiercely-loyal water buffalo crotch | 04/16/24 | | Pink disturbing nibblets | 04/16/24 | | sick fiercely-loyal water buffalo crotch | 04/16/24 | | provocative blathering tattoo | 04/16/24 | | Vibrant Tank | 04/16/24 | | bateful temple | 04/16/24 | | Vibrant Tank | 04/16/24 | | motley office | 04/16/24 | | Vibrant Tank | 04/16/24 | | bateful temple | 04/16/24 | | Aromatic Alcoholic Chapel Partner | 04/16/24 | | sick fiercely-loyal water buffalo crotch | 04/16/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 16th, 2024 4:57 PM Author: Aromatic Alcoholic Chapel Partner
Minimum contacts analysis.
Does the contract have a choice of venue clause?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587934) |
|
Date: April 16th, 2024 7:22 PM Author: Pink disturbing nibblets
never said i was smart
but i know enough that there are a million personal jdx decisions going both ways based on sufficient contacts when the issue is breach of contract
so the answer to my op is not clear cut imo
obviously if i had included a forum selection clause, it would be clear cut
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47588303) |
Date: April 16th, 2024 4:59 PM Author: Vibrant Tank
The answer is yes probably
did they first reach out to you or did you first reach out to them.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587939) |
|
Date: April 16th, 2024 5:18 PM Author: Vibrant Tank
If you emailed them first trying to get work that’s not the same as them reaching into your state. If they saw you passively on some internet site advertising services and emailed you first then that’s them reaching in.
It’s not necessarily dispositive either way but you’re better off with the latter.
Again, I’d just file suit and mention why jurisdiction is proper.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47588010) |
Date: April 16th, 2024 7:32 PM Author: Vibrant Tank
Just as a small law story I once repped a chick that gave over $10k to a fortune teller in California. Everything happened in my state ( not California). I argued jurisdiction under some contract theory — and the local judge felt sorry for the dumb chick and gave us judgment.
It was like 20 years ago so I can’t remember the details but the fortune teller kept telling this dumb Filipina chick that there was a curse on the Chick that the fortune teller would remove.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47588312) |
|
|