\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

does court have personal jdx over out of state co. that contracts w instate co?

out of state co hires in state co to perform consulting serv...
salmon shitlib
  04/16/24
You've come to the right place
Embarrassed To The Bone Friendly Grandma Hell
  04/16/24
a sweet legal treat
salmon shitlib
  04/16/24
Digital commerce is always arbitrable in the Hague
vivacious burgundy dilemma deer antler
  04/16/24
Why don’t you just shut the fuck up tranny
Flesh Mexican Whorehouse
  04/16/24
easy sp, I hate trannies, and I respect them more than you.
Embarrassed To The Bone Friendly Grandma Hell
  04/16/24
Yeah but this particular tranny is a mother fucker.
Flesh Mexican Whorehouse
  04/16/24
lol wtf?
salmon shitlib
  04/16/24
Minimum contacts analysis. Does the contract have a choic...
Comical cowardly mediation theater
  04/16/24
do you fucking think i would be asking this question if ther...
salmon shitlib
  04/16/24
Read it again
vivacious burgundy dilemma deer antler
  04/16/24
I think it’s HIS contract.
Flesh Mexican Whorehouse
  04/16/24
The fact that you are asking the bort this question indicate...
Comical cowardly mediation theater
  04/16/24
never said i was smart but i know enough that there are ...
salmon shitlib
  04/16/24
The answer is yes probably did they first reach out to y...
Flesh Mexican Whorehouse
  04/16/24
they reached out to me. i did all the work here in my state....
salmon shitlib
  04/16/24
They first reached into your Jurisdicition you signed contr...
Flesh Mexican Whorehouse
  04/16/24
I wouldn't even think twice about jurisdiction. Would includ...
odious cyan menage
  04/16/24
technically they requested i send them my contract, so i did...
salmon shitlib
  04/16/24
Why did they reach out to you in the first place. Thst is wh...
Flesh Mexican Whorehouse
  04/16/24
If you emailed them first trying to get work that’s no...
Flesh Mexican Whorehouse
  04/16/24
former client recommended me to them, they cold emailed me.
salmon shitlib
  04/16/24
Bro I think you are fine to file.
Flesh Mexican Whorehouse
  04/16/24
180
salmon shitlib
  04/16/24
It would be pretty shitty if a California company could avoi...
odious cyan menage
  04/16/24
Yes, I mean without doing the research I don't see why not.
odious cyan menage
  04/16/24
What does your state's long arm statute say?
Fluffy box office corn cake
  04/16/24
says they should be subject to PJ here bc of the contract wa...
salmon shitlib
  04/16/24
Then sounds like you are good to go. Just check service requ...
Fluffy box office corn cake
  04/16/24
...
Embarrassed To The Bone Friendly Grandma Hell
  04/16/24
Just as a small law story I once repped a chick that gave ov...
Flesh Mexican Whorehouse
  04/16/24
what happened after you got the judgment, isn't it uncertain...
Beady-eyed Heaven French Chef
  04/16/24
Sure. My retainer was limited in scope and I told her what ...
Flesh Mexican Whorehouse
  04/16/24
The only question you need to ask yourself is: does the tran...
ruby step-uncle's house internal respiration
  04/16/24
And other hokum.
Flesh Mexican Whorehouse
  04/16/24
cr, equity demands that this case be heard!
Beady-eyed Heaven French Chef
  04/16/24
Finally. Someone gets it.
Comical cowardly mediation theater
  04/16/24
But first, show us your hands.
Fluffy box office corn cake
  04/16/24


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 4:38 PM
Author: salmon shitlib

out of state co hires in state co to perform consulting services. instate co provides those services over zoom, email, phone, etc. all from instate. out of state co doesn't pay bills. can instate co sue out of state co in instate state?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587837)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 4:38 PM
Author: Embarrassed To The Bone Friendly Grandma Hell

You've come to the right place

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587842)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 4:52 PM
Author: salmon shitlib

a sweet legal treat

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587905)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 4:39 PM
Author: vivacious burgundy dilemma deer antler

Digital commerce is always arbitrable in the Hague

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587846)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 4:54 PM
Author: Flesh Mexican Whorehouse

Why don’t you just shut the fuck up tranny

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587913)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 4:55 PM
Author: Embarrassed To The Bone Friendly Grandma Hell

easy sp, I hate trannies, and I respect them more than you.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587916)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 4:56 PM
Author: Flesh Mexican Whorehouse

Yeah but this particular tranny is a mother fucker.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587925)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 4:57 PM
Author: salmon shitlib

lol wtf?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587926)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 4:57 PM
Author: Comical cowardly mediation theater

Minimum contacts analysis.

Does the contract have a choice of venue clause?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587934)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 4:59 PM
Author: salmon shitlib

do you fucking think i would be asking this question if there were a forum selection clause in the contract?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587940)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 5:13 PM
Author: vivacious burgundy dilemma deer antler

Read it again

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587994)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 5:14 PM
Author: Flesh Mexican Whorehouse

I think it’s HIS contract.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587999)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 7:08 PM
Author: Comical cowardly mediation theater

The fact that you are asking the bort this question indicates you aren't that smart.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47588281)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 7:22 PM
Author: salmon shitlib

never said i was smart

but i know enough that there are a million personal jdx decisions going both ways based on sufficient contacts when the issue is breach of contract

so the answer to my op is not clear cut imo

obviously if i had included a forum selection clause, it would be clear cut

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47588303)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 4:59 PM
Author: Flesh Mexican Whorehouse

The answer is yes probably

did they first reach out to you or did you first reach out to them.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587939)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 5:00 PM
Author: salmon shitlib

they reached out to me. i did all the work here in my state. then they basically said "thanks!" and jipped me on over $50,000.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587943)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 5:02 PM
Author: Flesh Mexican Whorehouse

They first reached into your Jurisdicition you signed contract here. Work performed here.

I would feel comfortable filing suit in my jurisdiction. I would include a jurisdictional basis in the original complaint I file.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587949)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 5:05 PM
Author: odious cyan menage

I wouldn't even think twice about jurisdiction. Would include reason for jurisdiction in my complaint, of course, but I do that in every complaint.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587965)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 5:07 PM
Author: salmon shitlib

technically they requested i send them my contract, so i did and they signed it in *their* state (online).



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587969)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 5:11 PM
Author: Flesh Mexican Whorehouse

Why did they reach out to you in the first place. Thst is what information did they have that prompted their solicitation of your services.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587985)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 5:18 PM
Author: Flesh Mexican Whorehouse

If you emailed them first trying to get work that’s not the same as them reaching into your state. If they saw you passively on some internet site advertising services and emailed you first then that’s them reaching in.

It’s not necessarily dispositive either way but you’re better off with the latter.

Again, I’d just file suit and mention why jurisdiction is proper.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47588010)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 5:24 PM
Author: salmon shitlib

former client recommended me to them, they cold emailed me.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47588019)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 5:25 PM
Author: Flesh Mexican Whorehouse

Bro I think you are fine to file.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47588026)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 5:29 PM
Author: salmon shitlib

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47588040)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 5:03 PM
Author: odious cyan menage

It would be pretty shitty if a California company could avoid lawsuits by hiring some schmo in Vermont, conduct business with this person, and then say, "Sorry, we never were actually IN Vermont, see because it was all over Zoom. You have to fund counsel in California and litigate out here." Not happening.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587960)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 5:01 PM
Author: odious cyan menage

Yes, I mean without doing the research I don't see why not.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587946)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 5:09 PM
Author: Fluffy box office corn cake

What does your state's long arm statute say?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47587976)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 5:27 PM
Author: salmon shitlib

says they should be subject to PJ here bc of the contract was connected to this state

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47588033)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 5:43 PM
Author: Fluffy box office corn cake

Then sounds like you are good to go. Just check service requirements.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47588090)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 5:45 PM
Author: Embarrassed To The Bone Friendly Grandma Hell



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47588093)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 7:32 PM
Author: Flesh Mexican Whorehouse

Just as a small law story I once repped a chick that gave over $10k to a fortune teller in California. Everything happened in my state ( not California). I argued jurisdiction under some contract theory — and the local judge felt sorry for the dumb chick and gave us judgment.

It was like 20 years ago so I can’t remember the details but the fortune teller kept telling this dumb Filipina chick that there was a curse on the Chick that the fortune teller would remove.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47588312)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 8:18 PM
Author: Beady-eyed Heaven French Chef

what happened after you got the judgment, isn't it uncertain and hard to actually collect on it against a fortune teller?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47588462)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 8:20 PM
Author: Flesh Mexican Whorehouse

Sure. My retainer was limited in scope and I told her what to do afterwards if she wanted to try to collect. She didn’t care just apparently needed to tell her dad she got a judgment in her favor. I think I charged $300 flat fee or something like that.

Flips, don’t give your daughters money without supervision or they’ll blow it on fortune tellers.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47588472)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 8:21 PM
Author: ruby step-uncle's house internal respiration

The only question you need to ask yourself is: does the transaction offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47588473)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 8:22 PM
Author: Flesh Mexican Whorehouse

And other hokum.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47588479)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 8:47 PM
Author: Beady-eyed Heaven French Chef

cr, equity demands that this case be heard!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47588568)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 9:30 PM
Author: Comical cowardly mediation theater

Finally. Someone gets it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47588663)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 16th, 2024 11:00 PM
Author: Fluffy box office corn cake

But first, show us your hands.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5518375&forum_id=2#47588949)