Listening to the Tucker/Rogan interview. Can anyone redpill me on UAPs?
| purple internal respiration | 04/25/24 | | wine address immigrant | 04/25/24 | | purple internal respiration | 04/25/24 | | fuchsia theatre | 04/25/24 | | purple internal respiration | 04/25/24 | | bearded tattoo menage | 04/25/24 | | purple internal respiration | 04/25/24 | | purple internal respiration | 04/25/24 | | purple internal respiration | 04/25/24 | | passionate white locale | 04/25/24 | | purple internal respiration | 04/25/24 | | passionate white locale | 04/25/24 | | Canary feces church building | 04/25/24 | | fuchsia theatre | 04/25/24 | | Lemon Market Reading Party | 04/26/24 | | passionate white locale | 04/26/24 | | Fighting public bath stock car | 04/25/24 | | dead sanctuary idiot | 04/25/24 | | indigo hyperactive native | 04/26/24 | | Sepia associate | 04/25/24 | | fuchsia theatre | 04/25/24 | | Fighting public bath stock car | 04/25/24 | | fuchsia theatre | 04/25/24 | | Ungodly Box Office | 04/25/24 | | hairraiser hunting ground | 04/25/24 | | fuchsia theatre | 04/25/24 | | Ungodly Box Office | 04/26/24 | | passionate white locale | 04/26/24 | | Provocative circlehead | 04/25/24 | | alcoholic exhilarant trailer park gay wizard | 04/25/24 | | Shivering swashbuckling sweet tailpipe space | 04/25/24 | | Odious black woman | 04/25/24 | | indigo hyperactive native | 04/26/24 | | Shaky locus | 04/26/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 25th, 2024 6:34 PM Author: passionate white locale
my belief is that it fits in the same category as flat earth and abortion: topics that globohomo appreciates and subtly or not so subtly promotes because there is no outcome which can result in a challenge to the establishment or a decline of people's belief in it.
could there be aliens? sure. is there any way to determine what is true or not true in it? no.
i would rather focus on topics where one can use a predictive grounding mechanism on -- i.e. you update your political or cultural model of the world by making predictions and if they are wrong, you update the model
without a grounding mechanism (the traditional scientific method is another) you can end up believing anything.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5521509&forum_id=2Reputation#47609970) |
|
Date: April 25th, 2024 6:40 PM Author: passionate white locale
i think it's a question you should weigh more heavily
absent faith in existing institutions or experts, what *method* do you use to choose to believe in one model versus another? how can you tell one theory apart from the next?
if you insist on investigating an unprovable model (which i strongly advise against), you will likely appreciate this post: https://barsoom.substack.com/p/devil-worshipping-aliens-from-dimension
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5521509&forum_id=2Reputation#47609979) |
Date: April 25th, 2024 7:42 PM Author: fuchsia theatre
None of it is remotely real. There is no evidence of UAPs. It's obviously fake. They don't have any evidence of this besides some grainy videos from the 50s or whatever. It's a total garbage theory. There's a French podcast about UAPs and they are always like why do they only find these in America? The aliens never visit France.
The whole premise is that these craft only show up in grainy images by American military jets and otherwise we never encounter them? It's a hoax. There are plausible explanations for all of the videos. They just look like random blurs in the clowds. No verbal testimony by these people is credible. It's nonsense.
The government is telling us about this because half the population is incredibly stoned at any given time. It's a distraction.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5521509&forum_id=2Reputation#47610071) |
Date: April 25th, 2024 7:52 PM Author: hairraiser hunting ground
the whole thing reeks absurdly of a super obvious Psyop.
deep state straight-up murders people for talking about anything it doesn't want aired publicly -- seth rich, assange, epstein. but we're supposed to believe these 'top secret clearance' dudes running their mouths on cable news about 'biologics' and recovered 'alien bodies' are escaping the ire of the deep state? that they are not in fact intel assets reading from a sanctioned PSYOP script? give me a break.
i put it at a 5% chance any of this is real.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5521509&forum_id=2Reputation#47610094) |
Date: April 25th, 2024 8:36 PM Author: alcoholic exhilarant trailer park gay wizard
- yes UAPs are real. Even fuckin Obama admitted it lol. Rubio admits it. Schumer admits it. It’s bipartisan consensus shit at this point. Christopher Mellon is probably the best guy to Google and read if you want an entry into the world of credible/ establishment UAP stuff.
- no evidence they are live aliens. Seems doubtful. But, one of the more credible witnesses (Grusch) has said that people he interviewed in his capacity as Inspector General or ombudsman or whatever said they have biologicals. (If it is a probe we are probably already fucked that they know about us.)
- the skeptics claim to have debunked it all because they say that the videos are low quality and much of the evidence is eyewitness. They discount all eyewitness testimony. The people saying psy op make me laugh. The least successful psy op of all time.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5521509&forum_id=2Reputation#47610161) |
Date: April 25th, 2024 8:41 PM Author: Shivering swashbuckling sweet tailpipe space
No one who looks into this topic conclude they're not real.
Even debunkers like Mick West just debunk individual videos and don't clam that that all UAP are not real.
For anyone who has always just assumed they were not a real thing and wants something reasonably concise and trustworthy, just read the COMETA report -- French Gov report concluding:
The authors of the COMETA report concluded that there was an "almost certain physical reality" of completely unknown flying objects displaying extraordinary capabilities that current science could not explain. They stated that based on the documented performance of UFOs, especially in cases with radar data, the extraterrestrial hypothesis appeared to be the most "probable" or "credible" explanation, though not scientifically proven. The report clearly differentiated between the reality of UFO phenomena and the notion of extraterrestrial visitors, which it said remained a hypothesis
https://ia800403.us.archive.org/17/items/pdfy-NRIQie2ooVehep7K/The%20Cometa%20Report%20%5BUFO%27s%20And%20Defense%20-%20What%20Should%20We%20Prepare%20For%5D.pdf
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5521509&forum_id=2Reputation#47610164)
|
Date: April 25th, 2024 9:02 PM Author: Odious black woman
Imagine being retarded enough to believe anything these people say in public, when all their congressional testimony refers to some other "closed door meeting involving classified information." The doods testifying about this shit are always relaxed and chill about it too. Not stressed.
But look at who the OP is.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5521509&forum_id=2Reputation#47610206) |
|
|