so trump was just waiting in his boxers to raw dog stormy when she arrived?
| Sinister know-it-all faggotry | 05/08/24 | | Glittery offensive persian | 05/08/24 | | Sinister know-it-all faggotry | 05/08/24 | | Glittery offensive persian | 05/08/24 | | translucent mind-boggling people who are hurt area | 05/08/24 | | Sinister know-it-all faggotry | 05/08/24 | | Glittery offensive persian | 05/08/24 | | Sinister know-it-all faggotry | 05/08/24 | | Glittery offensive persian | 05/09/24 | | vivacious preventive strike | 05/08/24 | | stirring umber scourge upon the earth sandwich | 05/08/24 | | Overrated Purple Lay | 05/08/24 | | Glittery offensive persian | 05/08/24 | | Slate stimulating church building pisswyrm | 05/09/24 | | Sinister know-it-all faggotry | 05/09/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 8th, 2024 5:37 AM Author: Sinister know-it-all faggotry
It was the courtroom face-off everyone was waiting for -- testimony of high legal importance, and salacious sexual content.
Donald Trump, the former US president who has always prided himself on being in charge and in control, was forced to sit and listen to a porn star describe in open court a bedroom encounter that he denies ever took place.
"When I opened the bathroom door to come out, Mr. Trump had come into the bedroom," Stormy Daniels told the New York court.
"The intention was pretty clear, someone stripped down to their underwear posing on the bed waiting for you."
Trump stared ahead through Daniels' testimony, which often veered into graphic sexual detail despite the judge's best efforts.
"My clothes and shoes were off, I think I still had my bra on. We were in missionary position."
Was he wearing a condom? "No."
Was it brief? "Yes."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5526359&forum_id=2#47644337) |
Date: May 8th, 2024 11:11 AM Author: stirring umber scourge upon the earth sandwich
i dont see how you could give stormy any credibility as a witness. she has a pecuniary interest in making things sound as salacious as possible, and an emotional interest in ruining trump. her story has not stayed consistent over the years either.
of course none of this testimony should have been allowed in the first place, it's obviously very prejudicial and irrelevant to the alleged crime
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5526359&forum_id=2#47644734) |
|
|