Over dissent, HELD: Ariz. Dept. of Ag. may approve identical cattle brands.
| Insane smoky space | 08/09/16 | | Insane smoky space | 08/09/16 | | Hyperventilating painfully honest private investor house | 08/09/16 | | Insane smoky space | 08/09/16 | | racy hairy legs fat ankles | 08/10/16 | | Insane smoky space | 02/27/17 | | racy hairy legs fat ankles | 06/21/17 | | Insane smoky space | 08/10/16 | | racy hairy legs fat ankles | 08/10/16 | | electric yapping resort dysfunction | 07/26/24 | | ungodly zippy multi-billionaire | 08/10/16 | | mustard excitant roommate | 08/10/16 | | Insane smoky space | 08/10/16 | | Transparent mother | 08/04/17 | | hideous swollen death wish native | 08/10/16 | | racy hairy legs fat ankles | 08/10/16 | | exciting brunch gaping | 09/12/16 | | hideous swollen death wish native | 08/10/16 | | Insane smoky space | 08/10/16 | | contagious copper main people meetinghouse | 08/11/16 | | Red Abusive Nursing Home Pervert | 10/18/16 | | racy hairy legs fat ankles | 08/10/16 | | Insane smoky space | 08/11/16 | | Curious forum | 12/24/23 | | Insane smoky space | 08/11/16 | | Drab depressive | 08/11/16 | | bright faggot firefighter antidepressant drug | 09/13/16 | | ruddy cruise ship sandwich | 08/11/16 | | Insane smoky space | 03/10/17 | | Cream Nubile Church Chad | 08/11/16 | | Insane smoky space | 08/11/16 | | Insane smoky space | 08/12/16 | | Naked Den Shitlib | 03/06/17 | | Insane smoky space | 09/12/16 | | contagious copper main people meetinghouse | 09/12/16 | | ungodly zippy multi-billionaire | 09/13/16 | | Insane smoky space | 09/13/16 | | racy hairy legs fat ankles | 09/12/16 | | Flesh slimy rigor | 09/12/16 | | floppy ivory feces | 09/12/16 | | Milky mad cow disease school | 09/13/16 | | Insane smoky space | 02/27/17 | | Flesh slimy rigor | 09/12/16 | | Insane smoky space | 09/13/16 | | Yellow galvanic wagecucks wrinkle | 09/12/16 | | obsidian vigorous digit ratio gaming laptop | 09/13/16 | | Insane smoky space | 09/13/16 | | exciting brunch gaping | 09/13/16 | | bright faggot firefighter antidepressant drug | 09/13/16 | | racy hairy legs fat ankles | 10/07/16 | | Insane smoky space | 10/07/16 | | Insane smoky space | 10/17/16 | | racy hairy legs fat ankles | 10/17/16 | | Supple Rambunctious Range | 10/18/16 | | trip grizzly faggotry | 03/06/17 | | Insane smoky space | 11/28/16 | | dashing pink pit | 11/28/16 | | racy hairy legs fat ankles | 12/16/16 | | Insane smoky space | 02/27/17 | | dashing pink pit | 02/27/17 | | Insane smoky space | 02/27/17 | | dashing pink pit | 02/27/17 | | Insane smoky space | 03/06/17 | | dashing pink pit | 03/06/17 | | scarlet crusty water buffalo background story | 03/06/17 | | frum doobsian gas station | 03/06/17 | | buff place of business indian lodge | 03/06/17 | | Insane smoky space | 03/08/17 | | Insane smoky space | 03/10/17 | | scarlet crusty water buffalo background story | 03/10/17 | | Laughsome Carmine Knife | 03/10/17 | | scarlet crusty water buffalo background story | 03/10/17 | | Insane smoky space | 03/10/17 | | Insane smoky space | 05/24/17 | | Insane smoky space | 06/02/17 | | spectacular onyx home nowag | 06/02/17 | | Free-loading stimulating location | 06/02/17 | | Insane smoky space | 06/02/17 | | Free-loading stimulating location | 06/02/17 | | Naked Den Shitlib | 06/03/17 | | Insane smoky space | 06/21/17 | | racy hairy legs fat ankles | 06/21/17 | | Insane smoky space | 07/31/17 | | mauve dragon brethren | 07/31/17 | | Insane smoky space | 08/03/17 | | Insane smoky space | 08/03/17 | | dashing pink pit | 08/03/17 | | buff place of business indian lodge | 08/03/17 | | Insane smoky space | 08/03/17 | | racy hairy legs fat ankles | 02/13/18 | | exciting brunch gaping | 06/03/22 | | Curious forum | 12/24/23 | | Adventurous legend | 10/08/24 | | Insane smoky space | 08/04/17 | | 180 cowardly turdskin | 02/13/18 | | Cream Nubile Church Chad | 02/13/18 | | racy hairy legs fat ankles | 02/13/18 | | Insane smoky space | 06/03/22 | | Insane smoky space | 02/05/24 | | razzle-dazzle lavender striped hyena | 06/03/22 | | Adventurous legend | 07/11/22 | | Adventurous legend | 12/24/23 | | at-the-ready field | 12/24/23 | | Curious forum | 12/24/23 | | Adventurous legend | 07/26/24 | | Heady center | 07/26/24 | | soul-stirring maize theater stage | 07/26/24 | | Insane smoky space | 11/04/24 | | Der Penis | 08/26/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 9th, 2016 3:53 PM Author: Insane smoky space
Stambaugh v. Butler, No. 1 CA-CV 14-0817 (Ariz. Ct. App. Aug 9, 2016)
http://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2016/CV14-0817.pdf
FACTS: Dude who has a bar seven (-7) cattle brand placed on the left rib wants to take his beasts from California to Arizona. He asks the Arizona Department of Agriculture for permission. Another dude in Arizona with a bar seven cattle brand placed on the left hip objects, NO FUCKING WAY; THAT'S MINE. And the statute says you can't register two identical designs.
ISSUE: Does the law allow identical brands on different parts of the cow?
HELD: Yes. Despite statutory language providing that "[n]o two brands of the same design or figure shall be adopted or recorded," the Arizona Department of Agriculture may approve identical brands if the brands are registered to different locations on the animal.
DISSENT: You fools. The prohibition on having the same DESIGN is completely separate from the statutory language you rely on concerning the LOCATION the design is placed.
DEEP ANALYSIS: Dissents are rare in Arizona appellate cases, and they're usually right when a judge goes to the effort of writing one. Here, the majority bared its unscholarly motives when it was, like, "Yeah, but if we don't allow the same brand in different places, it might invalidate other brands, and that's bad." The California cattledood should have been told to come up with a different brand.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2锞兾告触锟界锟絇HPSESSID=962c303388ae8b5678383d002493727e#31144562)
|
Date: August 9th, 2016 3:55 PM Author: Insane smoky space
Don't say I never do anything for you.
This is cutting edge shit.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2锞兾告触锟界锟絇HPSESSID=962c303388ae8b5678383d002493727e#31144575) |
 |
Date: August 9th, 2016 4:15 PM Author: Insane smoky space
Beyond the pale.
Perhaps we should offer our services to petition for supreme court review.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2锞兾告触锟界锟絇HPSESSID=962c303388ae8b5678383d002493727e#31144712)
|
Date: August 10th, 2016 7:04 AM Author: hideous swollen death wish native
Majority: "Who gives a shit about the exact wording of the law as long as the function of telling the brands apart is served?"
Minority: "WTF? This is directly contradictory to the law."
tbf,the majority opinion seems more efficient in this case but represents quite a transfer of power to the court
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2锞兾告触锟界锟絇HPSESSID=962c303388ae8b5678383d002493727e#31150026) |
 |
Date: August 10th, 2016 7:17 PM Author: Insane smoky space
JUSTICE FOR THE STAMBAUGH COWS!
Look at this jibberish:
"The ambiguity exists by virtue of the language of A.R.S. § 3-1261 and related statutes, read in context with each other. Accordingly, we must look, inter alia, to the Departments longstanding construction of the statutes. *****To do otherwise might render invalid hundreds of brands the Department accepted for recording over the past several decades based on their owners promises to apply the brands in different locations than prior similar recorded brands were to be applied.***** "
What do the consequences of "do[ing] otherwise" have to do with the interpretive task at hand?
Nothing. That's what.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2锞兾告触锟界锟絇HPSESSID=962c303388ae8b5678383d002493727e#31154793)
|
 |
Date: August 11th, 2016 12:19 AM Author: contagious copper main people meetinghouse
also seems like appellate court fact-finding
and results driven reasoning
and an impermissible delegation of power to agency that exceeds plain statutory text
i mean wtf. wtf.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2锞兾告触锟界锟絇HPSESSID=962c303388ae8b5678383d002493727e#31156945) |
 |
Date: August 12th, 2016 5:12 PM Author: Insane smoky space
http://bit.ly/2aRjSF7
Motions for reconsideration due by August 24, 2016.
Petitions for supreme court review due by September 8, 2016.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2锞兾告触锟界锟絇HPSESSID=962c303388ae8b5678383d002493727e#31170666) |
Date: September 12th, 2016 6:30 PM Author: Insane smoky space
Petition for review filed with Arizona Supreme Court.
http://bit.ly/2cms4Ke
May justice be done.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2锞兾告触锟界锟絇HPSESSID=962c303388ae8b5678383d002493727e#31392299) |
Date: September 13th, 2016 7:44 PM Author: exciting brunch gaping
this
is why we got into law
fuck this bullshit. this pisses me off so much.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2锞兾告触锟界锟絇HPSESSID=962c303388ae8b5678383d002493727e#31400584) |
 |
Date: October 7th, 2016 6:49 PM Author: Insane smoky space
A petition for review was filed, but the supreme court only grants around 3.9% of petitions in civil cases, which is usually a bit under 20 cases per year. It's a long shot.
Right now, it's taking about four months for the supreme court to consider petitions for review, and then it takes a while for them to get around to issuing the order to grant or deny.
The state got an extension until October 28 to file its response to the petition. So I'd guess that the petition will be decided around April.
Here's the supreme court's docket: http://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/aacc/appella/ASC/CV/CV160217.PDF
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2锞兾告触锟界锟絇HPSESSID=962c303388ae8b5678383d002493727e#31582282) |
Date: February 27th, 2017 4:47 PM Author: Insane smoky space
Petition for review GRANTED against all odds.
http://i.xomf.com/gspkr.png
May there be justice for Stambaugh's cows!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2锞兾告触锟界锟絇HPSESSID=962c303388ae8b5678383d002493727e#32713763) |
Date: March 8th, 2017 12:33 PM Author: Insane smoky space
Oral argument video available here:
https://www.azcourts.gov/AZ-Supreme-Court/Live-Archived-Video
I haven't watched it yet to see whether things are looking good for the Stambaugh cows, but I did notice that I had to turn off some of my ad blocking to get the video to load correctly.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2锞兾告触锟界锟絇HPSESSID=962c303388ae8b5678383d002493727e#32782045) |
 |
Date: March 10th, 2017 1:12 AM Author: Insane smoky space
Thoughts on oral argument.
(1) The state's attorney was having a rough time, but he shut up one of the justices when the justice was, like, "Have you even seen branding?" and the lawyers was, like, "Motherfucker, I grew up on a ranch. I've done it. It's easy."
38:44 - context
39:09 - rancher-lawyer revealed
(2) On whole, I think things went better for Stambaugh's cows. May justice be done.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2锞兾告触锟界锟絇HPSESSID=962c303388ae8b5678383d002493727e#32795775) |
Date: March 10th, 2017 12:43 PM Author: Insane smoky space
For those following along, the caption is now Stambaugh v. Killian.
Be sure to update your Westlaw and Lexis alerts.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2锞兾告触锟界锟絇HPSESSID=962c303388ae8b5678383d002493727e#32797775) |
Date: August 3rd, 2017 1:31 PM Author: Insane smoky space Subject: JUSTICE FOR THE STAMBAUGH CATTLE!
http://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2017/CV160217PR.pdf
¶1 Arizona Revised Statute § 3-1261(B) provides that no two brands of the same design or figure shall be adopted or recorded. Nonetheless, the Arizona Department of Agriculture (Department) allowed Eureka Springs to record a bar seven brand (7), even though it was identical to a previously recorded brand owned by David Stambaugh, because it was placed on a different location on the animals. We hold that the plain language of the statute precludes the Department from recording two brands of the same design or figure regardless of their location.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2锞兾告触锟界锟絇HPSESSID=962c303388ae8b5678383d002493727e#33910822) |
 |
Date: June 3rd, 2022 8:28 PM Author: exciting brunch gaping
this case has tortured me for almost six years and i didn't know this outcome
to be fair, it only felt like 2, maybe 3 years ago, but still
allahu akbar and God bless america!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2锞兾告触锟界锟絇HPSESSID=962c303388ae8b5678383d002493727e#44622573)
|
Date: July 26th, 2024 11:48 AM Author: Heady center Subject: Germany Niubian Pills 3000 mg, Xinwei Male Enhancement Pills - p
Wholesale Xinwei Germany Niubian Products From China Suppliers takes effect instantly and contains no poisonous element and has no side effects.
https://www.poerkan.com/product/germany-niubian-pills/
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2锞兾告触锟界锟絇HPSESSID=962c303388ae8b5678383d002493727e#47894980) |
Date: November 4th, 2024 12:53 PM Author: Insane smoky space
Justice from the SCOTUS of AZ cattle case retires.
https://archive.is/fOuel
Sometimes, it was the arcane cases that were notable for their importance, like a 2017 case about cattle brands, he said. The case tested an Arizona law that prevented identical brands, and whether the location of the brand mattered. The unanimous opinion written by Brutinel on its surface dealt with cattle brands but set a lasting framework for how courts interpret statutes and is often cited in other court rulings.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2锞兾告触锟界锟絇HPSESSID=962c303388ae8b5678383d002493727e#48280687) |
|
|