\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Founding Fathers didn't draft the 2nd Amendment with guntoting niggers in mind

They clearly did not mean for niggers to carry firearms. Wh...
dashing sapphire coldplay fan
  07/08/25
there was that UF or something law student posted about here...
deranged rose spot internal respiration
  07/08/25
...
flirting liquid oxygen hominid
  07/08/25
the founding fathers' cost-benefit analysis for allowing a r...
dashing sapphire coldplay fan
  07/08/25
100% interestingly, Switzerland also has a constitutional r...
deranged rose spot internal respiration
  07/08/25
Correct. Most early “gun control” laws were spec...
Pink cruel-hearted field toilet seat
  07/08/25
...
flirting liquid oxygen hominid
  07/08/25
...
Pink cruel-hearted field toilet seat
  07/09/25
Or individuals of any race. They just didn't want to threate...
tan national jap
  07/09/25
No, even the militia-minded view was an individual right to ...
Odious outnumbered nursing home pisswyrm
  07/09/25
...
Electric dilemma yarmulke
  07/09/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 10:41 AM
Author: dashing sapphire coldplay fan

They clearly did not mean for niggers to carry firearms. Why is this never mentioned by originalists?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2#49082201)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 10:44 AM
Author: deranged rose spot internal respiration

there was that UF or something law student posted about here a few weeks ago who wrote an article saying exactly this, that the originalist interpretation clearly means the freedom only applies to White people and was never intended for negros

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2#49082215)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 10:45 AM
Author: flirting liquid oxygen hominid



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2#49082217)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 10:53 AM
Author: dashing sapphire coldplay fan

the founding fathers' cost-benefit analysis for allowing a right to bear arms clearly assumed niggers would be in cages and not allowed to get anywhere near guns, ever

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2#49082242)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 11:01 AM
Author: deranged rose spot internal respiration

100%

interestingly, Switzerland also has a constitutional right to bear arms *FOR CITIZENS* (it's a very heavily armed country), but the law also specifically *bans* foreigners of certain enumerated nationalities (a bunch of muslim and black african countries) resident in the country from owning arms

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2#49082265)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 11:37 AM
Author: Pink cruel-hearted field toilet seat

Correct. Most early “gun control” laws were specifically created with that purpose.

Hilariously, California had to cite some of these laws to defend its own shitlib gun control laws due to Thomas’ “history and tradition” test created in Bruen: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-02-07/if-we-must-rely-on-history-and-tradition-to-assess-gun-laws-does-racist-history-count . Of course they added an “ith tho rathist” disclaimer.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2#49082362)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 8th, 2025 11:39 AM
Author: flirting liquid oxygen hominid



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2#49082369)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 9th, 2025 1:40 AM
Author: Pink cruel-hearted field toilet seat



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2#49085166)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 9th, 2025 1:42 AM
Author: tan national jap

Or individuals of any race. They just didn't want to threaten state militia since there was no national army yet

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2#49085168)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 9th, 2025 2:22 AM
Author: Odious outnumbered nursing home pisswyrm

No, even the militia-minded view was an individual right to own weapons suitable for militia use, because they also viewed the militia as checking state authority.

Here's an 1840 case taking this view https://guncite.com/court/state/21tn154.html ("If the citizens have these arms in their hands, they are prepared in the best possible manner to repel any encroachments upon their rights by those in authority.")

BTW, what army did George Washington command?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2#49085182)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 9th, 2025 6:40 AM
Author: Electric dilemma yarmulke



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747530&forum_id=2#49085300)