This lawyer deponent puts TSINAH to shame, absolute perfection (vid)
| """'"'"""'' | 07/04/25 | | """'"'"""'' | 07/04/25 | | Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband | 07/04/25 | | Jarred I. Williams | 07/04/25 | | """'"'"""'' | 07/04/25 | | Diamond Dallas Trump | 07/04/25 | | """'"'"""'' | 07/04/25 | | Diamond Dallas Trump | 07/04/25 | | """'"'"""'' | 07/04/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 5:41 PM Author: """'"'"""''
there is no way he is violating the rules as much as the deponent. are you serious?
yes he's ineffective, the better strategy would have been to keep asking the questions and let the other guy make fake objections and refuse to answer, then go to the judge. no need for him to explain why the guy needs to answer.
regardless, the lawyer being deposed had his license suspended for the conduct according to the YouTube description below the video.
looks like that might not be the only time he's been suspended too, unless there are multiple lawyers in Colorado with similar names...
https://www.lawweekcolorado.com/article/court-opinion-colorados-pdj-suspends-attorney-after-he-called-a-former-client-a-crybaby-yelled-profanity-at-the-client-in-a-denver-restaurant/
https://www.law360.com/pulse/articles/2262194/colo-atty-suspended-over-online-comments-about-ex-client
https://www.coloradolegalregulation.com/wp-content/uploads/PDJ/Decisions/Abrams,%20Conditional%20Admission%20of%20Misconduct,%2021PDJ044,%2007-16-21.pdf
https://www.coloradolegalregulation.com/wp-content/uploads/PDJ/Decisions/Abrams,%20Conditional%20Admission%20of%20Misconduct,%2020PDJ004,%2004-30-20.pdf
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746099&forum_id=2#49072452) |
Date: July 4th, 2025 5:43 PM Author: """'"'"""''
LJL at this nugget:
"During lunch break on the second day of trial, Abrams went to opposing counsel’s office
building with no legitimate reason for being in the building at that time. He rode the elevator
with opposing counsel and his client (the plaintiff in the case), over objections from
opposing counsel and a security guard. Abrams was disruptive to and confrontational with
people in opposing counsel’s office. Based on this conduct, the trial court entered a
restraining order against Abrams, listing opposing counsel as the protected party."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746099&forum_id=2#49072461) |
|
|