The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Why do libs talk about "income inequality" when billionaire don't have "income"
| Ruddy Digit Ratio | 02/07/26 |
| Ruddy Digit Ratio | 02/07/26 |
| Floppy Learning Disabled Queen Of The Night | 02/07/26 |
| Ruddy Digit Ratio | 02/07/26 |
| Cheese-eating Silver Coffee Pot | 02/07/26 |
| soul almost gone | 02/10/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 7th, 2026 10:57 AM Author: Ruddy Digit Ratio as in taxable income. Zuckerberg probably just pays himself $280k or something and lets the rest Compound.
if you hate boomers you should bitch about Net Worth inequality
"income inequality" is just a dog whistle they use to go after the middle class. a $600k HHI is the top 1% cutoff which is basically the irl middle class. it's just 2 Losers making 300k. individual top 1% is only 450k iirc. this varies by location and COL. YMMV. |
Date: February 7th, 2026 11:00 AM Author: Ruddy Digit Ratio btw "shrinking middle class" literally means that the percentile to be middle class has increased. if it used to be 50th, it's now higher. very few redditors understand this. Discuss. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832094&forum_id=2#49653352) |
|
Date: February 7th, 2026 11:17 AM Author: Floppy Learning Disabled Queen Of The Night The phrase "wealth inequality" is commonly used. Nobody ever said "TAXABLE income inequality". (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832094&forum_id=2#49653385) |
 |
Date: February 7th, 2026 11:31 AM Author: Ruddy Digit Ratio I hear income more than wealth. I think jews planted this in libs' heads. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832094&forum_id=2#49653404) |
|
Date: February 7th, 2026 11:27 AM Author: Cheese-eating Silver Coffee Pot Beep beep beep (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832094&forum_id=2#49653400) |
|
Date: February 10th, 2026 2:43 PM Author: soul almost gone (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5832094&forum_id=2#49661257) |