(Future millionaire who likes money)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747168&forum_id=2#49079502)

*looks back at historical chart showing TSLA's performance over the last five years*

Yeah fair, it seems pretty unlikely that this stock will ever go back up above $300 again...

:(

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747168&forum_id=2#49079513)

Retarded PermaPoor Boomer c. 2010: "...and that's why it's stupid to buy this 'AAPL' shit, that crappy fake internet company's been around for more than a decade now and it's NEVER turned a profit!"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747168&forum_id=2#49079713)

since april, i have bought TSLA, HOOD, NVDA, and RKLB

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747168&forum_id=2#49079614)

PLTR is solid as well if you're looking to diversify.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747168&forum_id=2#49079643)

i'm putting 5k/mo into crypto (split between BTC, SOL and XRP) and 4k/mo into stocks/ETFs. i hope this fucking crypto moons soon.

if i hit $1.5m, i am leaving my law firm and hanging out a shingle as an arbitrator. i can pay myself like $150k a year until i'm 65 on that, by which time my wife and i will have like $17m in our retirement accounts.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747168&forum_id=2#49079647)

Today's prices on this shit will look cheap in 2030.

Just remember that one of the primary reasons (at least ostensibly) that faggots never bought BTC on the way up was because it was "too damn expensive now" -- they moaned about that back when it first hit $1k/BTC, and then again when it first hit $5k/BTC, and then DEFINITELY when it first hit $10k/BTC, etc etc etc. And the end result was that they always had a "good" excuse not to buy any. "If only I had bought it two years ago back when it was cheap!"

How many of those very same "damn it's just too expensive now grrrrr" faggots would literally suck a dirty dick and gobble down a load of diseased cum in order to be able to buy up a bunch of BTC @ $10k/pop in 2025? And yet every single one of them had the opportunity to do that without the dick element just a few years ago, and they passed -- and most of them also went out of their way to mock me as a "retard" at the time for saying that was a stupid call which they would come to regret.

The only thing more expensive than not manning up and buying into bluechip wealth building vehicles even as they continue to grow more expensive over time is the long-term cost associated with the foolish decision to keep putting it off and never actually pull the trigger because it's always "just too darn expensive."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747168&forum_id=2#49079657)

i bought TSLA based solely on your poasting.

tyvm.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747168&forum_id=2#49079680)

I bought SOL back when it had a single digit price and up to this point I have never seriously considered selling any of it.

I don't own any XRP and never have.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747168&forum_id=2#49079693)

Theyre also going to be in places where taxi services basically don't exist right now. Like in Cincinatti its impossible to get a taxi without calling ahead and booking some expensive bullshit despite it having over 2 million people in the mtro. And in much smaller towns too with populations of 2000 why wouldn't an autonomous vehicle be there? You could probably put one in a town of 100 and it would get used a lot.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747168&forum_id=2#49079733)

...now factor in that Tesla is:

1. The ONLY "FSD vehicle" company in the world right now that is well-positioned to truly mass produce these kind of vehicles at scale and in a time/cost-effective manner (Tesla expects to be cranking out a new Robotaxi every 5 seconds by 2026 -- meanwhile, Waymo only has 700 cars TOTAL across all of its fleets and no roadmap to achieve any sort of similar production scale in the foreseeable future, which means that Tesla will literally double the current size of the Waymo fleet in less than two hours of production time once they start cranking); and

2. As a result, ALSO the ONLY "FSD vehicle" company in the world right now that will be well-positioned to handle demand in new markets in a reasonable fashion that won't leave frustrated passengers waiting 30+ minutes for their ride to arrive and swearing they'll never make this mistake again.

(Incidentally, that's exactly why Waymo has partnered up with Uber in all of the markets that they currently service. You think they wanted to do that? They would LOVE to set up their own service, like Tesla has done, but they can't do that because they simply don't have enough vehicles, and they can't produce new vehicles fast enough to create huge fleets... and guess what happens when you're forced to partner up with Uber and sponge off their network rather than running your own? Yep, that's right, Uber predictably refuses to allow you to significantly undercut their own "human driver" prices on their own network, which means that you can NEVER hope to compete with Tesla on price and you're 100% doomed to fail miserably against your biggest competitor on the single most important metric to your end users, ride cost. Oops!)

Saying this "race" is already over is an overstatement, because there was never really any "race" to begin with. Tesla won before the "race" even started.

I wonder what percentage of Brilliant Jewish XO Pumos sneering about how TSLA is MEGAFUKT know any of that, btw?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5747168&forum_id=2#49079752)