is it because it's true	aromatic station	07/13/26
The rhetorical need for a historical boogeyman. Many differe...	Bonkers volcanic crater doctorate	07/13/26
Oh damn should I do this with my predecessors	aromatic station	07/13/26
Bet	Bonkers volcanic crater doctorate	07/13/26
Historically, bad Latin and uncritical reading of "auth...	cerebral pocket flask	07/13/26
The Aristotelian claim that substances possess irreducible f...	Bonkers volcanic crater doctorate	07/13/26
Rupert Sheldrake discussed this	aromatic station	07/13/26
The stuff he says about Aristotle is legit. Some of the stuf...	Bonkers volcanic crater doctorate	07/13/26
...	aromatic station	07/13/26

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:17 PM Author: aromatic station is it because it's true (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2#49997960)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:27 PM Author: Bonkers volcanic crater doctorate The rhetorical need for a historical boogeyman. Many different groups benefitted from portraying their predecessors as sterile schoolmen. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2#49997987)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:28 PM Author: aromatic station Oh damn should I do this with my predecessors (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2#49997989)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:33 PM Author: Bonkers volcanic crater doctorate Bet (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2#49997997)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:34 PM Author: cerebral pocket flask Historically, bad Latin and uncritical reading of "authorities" based on incomplete or corrupt corpora, and then materialism in the natural sciences proved so powerful that the idea that substantial forms have any causal power was almost entirely abandoned. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2#49998000)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:52 PM Author: Bonkers volcanic crater doctorate The Aristotelian claim that substances possess irreducible forms that ground their identity, unity and directed activities still has not been decisively refuted by science. I think at the very least a naturalized account of form as causally efficacious organization is highly plausible, while the stronger scholastic ontology remains a live but unverified interpretation. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2#49998043)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:54 PM Author: aromatic station Rupert Sheldrake discussed this (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2#49998046)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:59 PM Author: Bonkers volcanic crater doctorate The stuff he says about Aristotle is legit. Some of the stuff he says regarding biology is obviously crankery, but actually not bad if taken as metaphor. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2#49998061)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:54 PM Author: aromatic station (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2#49998047)