Date: May 27th, 2019 1:32 AM
Author: Hairless cerebral property giraffe
I've never heard anyone say this IRL but I've noticed it over and over again. The more winding the road one takes, the more likely it leads to disaster. This can be applied to anything basically.
For instance, if your relationship is "complicated," then it is most likely doomed.
Peterman self-teaching Engineering is all but impossible because of Clique/IQ considerations but for a high-IQ Nerd poster it's basically just down to sitting at a computer and being yourself.
If you're watching someone at an Office Firm go about some task that you aren't familiar with in a spectactularly complex, Womanesque way, wherein it seems like they might know what they are doing but yuo can't tell, chances are that they suck at it. How many solos waste time on nonsense and make $19k a year while others $300/hr? The latter is a Winner who Wins.
Hitler was a failure (a Loser, anyway) who veered from his lane and became a High Loser. His road to power was rife with treachery and unlikely or impossible situations, from failing at art (possibly due to Clique since his paintings were basically better than Picasso's) to being a WWI conscript to liberal arts to staging a failed coup to imprisonment to more liberal arts to staging a 9/11-esque false flag and become Chancellor of Germany, but it couldn't last because a High Loser is always cloyingly yearning for more and it only takes one wrong move to spell Ruination.
A Winner like Trump just ran for POTUS and then became POTUS; Hillary's Loss has its post-mortum laced with various meandering Lies about interference in order to cushion the blow. Losers demand a REASON for their Losing and they aren't often comfortable with it just being due to Clique/phenotype.
This is why Winners are so bad at giving advice. ITE and other hardships make poet-philosophers of us all. Good time$ and ea$y money turn us into vacuous idiots.
Diary Entry #21,682
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4270003&forum_id=2#38294744)