figured i'd just laugh and conclude "lol faggot" watching it, but that poor leaf has been completely ground down.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5204853&forum_id=2#45273129)

like lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5204853&forum_id=2#45273145)

i find it endlessly hilarious how much jordan peterson epitomizes the things he rails against

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5204853&forum_id=2#45273208)

*gets thrown into dingy cell by daughter while she fucks some milk dud looking nigger*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5204853&forum_id=2#45273201)

The worst sort of advice comes from people for whom everything came easy and then they go "be like me and do the things that I did even though you're a loser and I'm a winner who's never had a real setback or adversity"

I like Buffett and Schwarzenegger and star athletes etc. but they have nothing, absolutely nothing to say to desperate failure-to-launch losers whereas Peterson is obviously much closer to being on their wavelength, and that's a good thing not a bad thing

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5204853&forum_id=2#45273238)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5204853&forum_id=2#45273748)

it used to be 1/3 of men died in war, now 1/3 of men will die alone

thems the breaks

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5204853&forum_id=2#45273218)

there was at least a plausible pretense to dignity in dying in a war in a homogenous patriarchal culture.

now men are not only expendable but viciously abused and stripped of all dignity, which is politically reapportioned to idiotic womyn and minorities.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5204853&forum_id=2#45273270)

lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5204853&forum_id=2#45273333)

it just casts fatal doubts upon his overall judgment.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5204853&forum_id=2#45273225)

i think every sane person can agree that "you're a man - act like it!" is great advice for every man. but beyond that, this guy has nothing useful to say. he really is a living breathing unironic example of the "gatekeeper" meme

i'd call him a scam artist but that seems unfair to scam artists, many of whom are very talented and work hard for a living

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5204853&forum_id=2#45273259)

he had some interesting takes that were vaguely dissident adjacent. to the extent that he is politically obtuse, i don't think it is intentional subversion. i just think he's ultimately a blinkered Boomertard.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5204853&forum_id=2#45273304)

he runs the same "be a man" shtick, but in a more brutally honest manner, and with more detail on exactly what you should do to "be a man" other than "don't be a mopey loser"

he's also a genuine dissident and speaks out directly against many specific institutions and actors in power

"they" obviously agree with this assessment, because they pulled out all the stops to Shut It Down for him, while peterson still gets invited on globohomo "talk shows" to incoherently babble and break down crying for no apparent reason

(FYI, it's funny because andrew tate pumped and dumped jordan peterson's retarded sociopathic slut daughter)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5204853&forum_id=2#45273330)

as men lose social status and women gain (pseudo)-status, professionally and economically, the premium placed on indicators of coarse forms of masculinity (sheer size, height, dominance, low-grade abusiveness e.g. 'negging', sociopathy) increases.

100 years ago, under a patriarchal organization of society in which women were firmly subordinated in every sense, someone who followed Peterson's model of masculinity would have been invested with more status, and someone like Tate would have been seen as beyond the pale, a brute.

gentility and masculine status could coexist then, because men had monopolies on all forms of social status (College Professorships, etc), and that status could be transmuted into 'masculinity'. now, women essentially dominate many of the professions (artificially), so these forms of status have lost their ability to confer masculinity.

the only forms of masculine status that are still monopolized by males involve the raw attributes of manhood previously mentioned -- physical power, testosterone, violent aggression, etc. so these have become the only things that women value in men, because they are the things that remain out of reach to the ongoing process of political reapportionment of male status (professional/economic/cultural) unto womyn.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5204853&forum_id=2#45273412)

devastating

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5204853&forum_id=2#45273265)

I am also that disaffected "young" fella who could use an encouraring word :'(

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5204853&forum_id=2#45274029)