his twitter bio is ''founder of Clique Theory'' to troll cowgod

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5633202&forum_id=2#48330268)

It’s always about Engineering

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5633202&forum_id=2#48330322)

He can’t categorize Cliques properly

Guy is a joke

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5633202&forum_id=2#48330346)

the internet has become about phenotype expression and nothing more. even substack is basically phenotype expression.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5633202&forum_id=2#48481894)

the guy should be given the biggest wedgie known to man

what a total faggot, my god

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5633202&forum_id=2#48518569)

Spamming about Clique Theory for a decade as cowgod has is literally more generative, creative, and worthy of discussion than PT's entire oeuvre and it isn't close. Clique Theory is actually interesting, at least inasmuch as it asks us to think hard about how our natures bracket our interactions with others and the wider world. In that way, it applies a kind of Kantianism to social dynamics. It isn't like cowgod acted without intellectual inspiration, which I'm sure he would acknowledge, but it at least taxonomizes the social world in an interesting way and even explains convincingly some of what we see playing out between and among Clique categories (and that's another interesting feature of Clique Theory--you can discern clique at a glance, and I say this as, in all likelihood, a loser). I'm not sure the world is as simple as cowgod suggests, but he at least has a synoptic system, which is never a mean feat.

PT, on the other hand, is just a charlatan, thief, and idiot.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5633202&forum_id=2#48518590)