Justice Barrett's kids are "really into incest porn":
| Crimson cocky dog poop | 01/15/25 | | Sinister pearl base | 01/15/25 | | burgundy passionate sanctuary private investor | 01/15/25 | | slap-happy office incel | 01/15/25 | | cerebral nighttime abode | 01/15/25 | | slap-happy office incel | 01/15/25 | | Abnormal elastic band pisswyrm | 01/16/25 | | citrine ratface | 01/15/25 | | slap-happy office incel | 01/15/25 | | Motley tripping son of senegal | 01/15/25 | | cerebral nighttime abode | 01/15/25 | | Milky Temple Lettuce | 01/15/25 | | hideous opaque sandwich | 01/16/25 | | Glittery School | 01/15/25 | | vibrant coiffed market | 01/15/25 | | burgundy passionate sanctuary private investor | 01/16/25 | | self-absorbed station | 01/16/25 | | Odious frisky mad-dog skullcap | 04/30/26 | | trip mewling feces half-breed | 05/03/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 15th, 2025 3:37 PM Author: Crimson cocky dog poop
JUSTICE BARRETT: Well, whoa, whoa, whoa.
MR. SHAFFER: -- for screening out --
JUSTICE BARRETT: I mean, let's see. In -- in Ashcroft II, the Court, you know, expressed anxiety about the fact that technology moves so fast that the five years between the district court findings in that case and the case being at the Supreme Court, you know, that technology may have moved beyond the record at that point.
It's been 20 years since Ashcroft. The iPhone was introduced in 2007 and Ashcroft was decided in 2004. I mean, kids can get online porn through gaming systems, tablets, phones, computers. It's -- let me just say that content filtering for all those different devices, I can say from personal experience, is difficult to keep up with.
So -- and -- and I think that the explosion of addiction in -- to online porn has shown that content filtering isn't working.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2024/23-1122_4f15.pdf
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5664253&forum_id=2#48555566) |
|
|