---

It is really hard to separate truth from fiction in the media, which is almost all lies. Unless you have a framework to assess these events, you will be hopelessly reacting to whatever the Current Thing is.

Up next by 2030: the Greater Israel project effectuated (with Hamas, Iran, Hezbollah, Gaza, Ukraine, Russia, Yemen, Iraq all destroyed, there will be nothing to stop it), the rebuilding of the Third Temple, a fake Messiah king installed in Israel (tapping into billions of Abrahamic faith’s latent hopes because of the egregore they’ve summoned) which will turn out to be an ultra-malevolent anti-Christ, enforcing the Mark of the Beast via CBDC and a woke, aggressive AI controlling people on the individual level.

One can see this call via Carl Jung’s analysis of astrology (Pisces Age twin fish, Christ/anti-Christ) and via the timing (2,000 years after the death of Christ in 30 AD), via Rene Guenon’s solidification of the world and the Kali Yuga, via Wilhelm Marr’s 1879 predictions.

Things are going to happen fast now as they sprint to the end goal.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736939&forum_id=2#49010310)

"current thing"

"greater israel"

"carl jung"

You are such a stupid nigger. You might be the dumbest, blackest nigger gorilla retard that has ever poasted.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736939&forum_id=2#49010369)

That is where things are headed.

With a rebuilt Third Temple.

And a proclaimed (fake) Messiah king.

By 2030.

As woke AI/CBDC control your life on a personal level.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736939&forum_id=2#49010404)

When I make a prediction, I swing for the fences, baby.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736939&forum_id=2#49010444)

and who has to confirm this? i don't want tou declaring some person is the messiah lr some building is the third temple. juat to go with the easier one, will israel declare the third temple has been completed by 2031?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736939&forum_id=2#49010455)

Israel rabbinate, especially Chabad/ultra-orthodox. The Third Temple will be built on the Temple Mount so there will be no way for anyone to miss it - it'll be all over the news.

Yes.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736939&forum_id=2#49010463)

"Only Jews."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736939&forum_id=2#49011391)

Can you explain this?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736939&forum_id=2#49010421)

See here for more, you're read it before:

https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/on-the-end-times-and-the-antichrist

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736939&forum_id=2#49010431)

The reign of the Antichrist is going to be really ugly, but there's plenty of other reasons to be sour: declining EROEI = mass poverty for the future, philosophical pessimism as baked into the nature of this reality.

I am looking forward to the new God Image in the Age of Aquarius, though, which will favor the God within i.e. gnosticism.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736939&forum_id=2#49010442)

So is it starting or ending?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736939&forum_id=2#49010480)

Christ marked the start of the Age of Pisces (one of the two fish) with his death/resurrection in 30 AD. Faith in Christ started strong, has grown weaker throughout the Age.

The anti-Christ will bookend the end of the Age of Pisces (the other twin fish) in 2030 AD. Started weak (re: secularism/materialism), has grown stronger throughout the Age.

The anti-Christ's failure, after a horrific reign which will have the same impact on humanity as Christ did but negatively (i.e. it's going to be REALLY ugly), will then mark the start of the Age of Aquarius.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736939&forum_id=2#49010484)

"ChatGPT said:

Jung never wrote a systematic treatise on the Age of Aquarius, but he did engage with it symbolically and mythologically — especially in later works like Aion (1951) and his Red Book (composed ~1914–1930, published posthumously in 2009). Here's how he understood and approached it:

1. The Age of Aquarius as a Symbolic Transition

In Aion, Jung interprets history as unfolding through astrological ages, where each ~2,000-year period is shaped by the dominant symbolic energies of its corresponding zodiacal sign:

The Age of Taurus (Bull-worship, goddess religions),

The Age of Aries (heroic-warrior cultures, Yahweh, Mosaic monotheism),

The Age of Pisces (Christianity and its opposites),

Followed by the Age of Aquarius (projected to begin around 2000 AD, though astrologers disagree on exact timing).

He argued that the Age of Pisces is marked by a duality (the twin fish swimming in opposite directions), representing the psychological tension between opposites — conscious/unconscious, light/dark, good/evil — embodied in the Christ/Antichrist archetype.

Aquarius, then, would represent the resolution or culmination of that psychic tension — not its erasure, but its confrontation.

2. The Symbol of Aquarius

Jung didn’t write a detailed breakdown of Aquarius as a zodiacal symbol, but what can be inferred from his writings:

Aquarius is the water-bearer, but paradoxically it is an air sign. The image is of a man pouring out water — a symbol of life, cleansing, or revelation.

Jung might have seen this as a release of unconscious contents — a collective confrontation with the psychic shadow that Christianity repressed: instinct, femininity, matter, and evil.

The water-bearer pours out rather than contains — possibly a symbol of dissolution of boundaries, the unleashing of chaos or gnosis, or the collective individuation of humanity.

His emphasis in Aion was not utopian — the Age of Aquarius was unlikely to be an enlightened paradise. Rather, it would be the age in which the unconscious content repressed during the Piscean age returns, possibly in terrifying form.

“We are living in what the Greeks called the kairos—the right time—for a ‘metamorphosis of the gods,’ of the fundamental principles and symbols.” (Aion)

3. Gnosticism, the Shadow, and the Return of the God Within

In the Red Book and elsewhere, Jung suggested that the next religious age would be marked not by an externalized God (Christ, church, dogma), but by an internalized God — the Self — revealed through individuation.

This Age of Aquarius would thus be characterized by a rediscovery of gnosis and the rebirth of ancient inner wisdom.

The shadow of the Christian age — the repressed opposites — would rise into view, both individually and culturally.

The Antichrist would not merely be a political figure, but a psychological phenomenon: the over-identification with rationalism, technology, scientism — the inflation of the human ego in opposition to God.

He warned that failure to integrate this shadow would lead to catastrophe. Hence, he believed this new age required psychological maturity and symbolic literacy — tools he thought depth psychology could provide.

4. Ambiguity and Caution

Jung viewed these astrological transitions not as deterministic prophecy, but as symbolic frameworks expressing psychic undercurrents.

He was cautious about literalizing the Age of Aquarius, even while engaging it:

“I am not a prophet, I can only point to things that are happening.”

— Jung to Miguel Serrano (C.G. Jung and Hermann Hesse: A Record of Two Friendships)

Jung’s framework suggests the Aquarian age will require:

Radical inner transformation,

Confrontation with evil and unconscious content,

Breakdown of old religious and societal structures,

Emergence of new forms of spiritual understanding rooted in the Self.

In Summary

Jung saw the Age of Aquarius as the incoming epoch after the Age of Pisces, bringing upheaval, psychological confrontation, and potential spiritual renewal.

The symbol of Aquarius — the water-bearer — represents a pouring out of unconscious contents, gnosis, or chaos.

He viewed it not optimistically or apocalyptically, but as a dangerous opportunity: a kairotic time when individuation must be scaled up to the level of collective humanity, or else psychic inflation and mass psychosis would prevail.

The new God-image would not be external or institutional, but internal, paradoxical, and nondual."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736939&forum_id=2#49010520)

It’ll be covered again from different angles.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736939&forum_id=2#49010623)

*Deeply Religious 90-IQ Schizophrenic Man High Off His Ass On LSD opens up this thread*

"Haha wow... holy shit, this retard is fucking nuts."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736939&forum_id=2#49011140)

1. Link to me substantively "predicting" anything about that? My point in that thread was just the same point I make in every thread where you're purporting to spout off predictions: you almost never actually make falsifiable predictions on concrete timelines, and it's one of the reasons why you're a huge faggot. And yes, *after* I held your feet to the fire ITT you actually did buckle down and make a falsifiable prediction on a concrete timeline (for once) and it turned out to be accurate, so good job. Try doing that more often IMO.

2. LJL at you of all people invoking "uh pretty sure I made a correct prediction champ so stfu" as some sort of defense here. Weird how you scoff at me when I invoke that very same point in response to some screed you're making about how I'm "always wrong about politics" or whatever!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736939&forum_id=2#49011157)

That's what I'm doing here in this thread, brother.

Buckle up!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736939&forum_id=2#49011160)

I'll grant you this -- my problem with this thread is, in fact, the fact that a bunch of your predictions in here are substantively insane rather than suffering from procedural issues that make them non-falsifiable.

So fair enough. Good luck!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5736939&forum_id=2#49011161)