Unsurprising stuff: We saw their consolidated attempt to tie him to the scene of the crime, and it was just as underwhelming as expected. There's grainy footage of a guy in a maroon shirt, khakis, and hat arriving in a Dodge Challenger and walking in the parking garage. No clear shots of his face or anything. Hair density seems potentially inconsistent with TR but it's really impossible to tell whether it's him. Then there's footage of the same guy returning to the car and leaving campus. Then there's footage of a guy in a black T-shirt with a flag graphic and denim pants limping around campus; the theory is that he had unassembled rifle pieces in his pant leg. Also tough to say if that's TR or the same guy as the maroon shirt. We also finally got more roof footage, and it didn't answer any Qs. It was just, "trust us, those pixels are him lying down and taking the shot." They literally said "we ASSUME" it's him doing that. You really don't see anything at all. They expressly admitted they didn't have video where you could see him taking the shot. And again, we are meant to believe tiny roof person is TR because they say it is, and that he's carrying a rifle because they say he is.

Somewhat surprising new info:

- According to the lead investigator's timeline, TR made contact with TPUSA representatives shortly after arriving on campus the first time. We have no details about this meeting. Could be nothing; maybe he just found someone and asked what time the event was starting. Would like to hear more.

- A vehicle believed to be TR's was seen on the night of the murder being driven by a bald guy with three other people in it. People on Twitter are joking about Blake Neff being the bald guy in question.

- There was an unspent round from a rifle found on a different rooftop on campus on September 10th. The state is saying an officer must have gone onto that roof at some point with a loaded rifle and cycled their firearm.

- There was an armed man with a badge accompanying the cop who first got to the Losee Center roof, and the cop says he doesn't know who the other guy was. Also, the cop's body cam ran out of battery and died as soon as he got to the roof.

Apparently the "trans" "roommate" ("boyfriend"?)'s "testimony" they got at the police station was just the cop feeding him a story and him agreeing to it. And they're not allowing him to be a live witness; all the court is allowed to hear from him is what the cops have. Pretty big W for the defense on keeping the media from seeing that interview before the trial: the judge is excluding large portions from being played during this hearing.

Q about the new roof footage and timeline: do any of you actually believe the "he was motivated by tranny ideology" story, and if so, does the timing of the shot help provide legitimacy to that idea? Like do you guys think he was waiting for CK to say something related to trans people so he could take him down then and there? Because the new footage shows he only could've been in position to set up and take the shot for around 30 seconds, so it would've been pretty lucky for him if he got there at the perfect time to get a tranny-related answer.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880869&forum_id=2#49986935)

'I want to address some of the discussion about the lack of an exit wound with Charlie. I’m usually not interested in delving into most of this kind of online chatter, and I apologize this is somewhat graphic, but in this case, the fact that there wasn’t an exit wound is probably another miracle, and I want people to know.

I just spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital…

He said the bullet “absolutely should have gone through, which is very very normal for a high powered, high velocity round. I’ve seen wounds from this caliber many times and they always just go through everything. This would have taken a moose or two down, an elk, etc.”

But it didn’t go through. Charlie’s body stopped it.

I mentioned to his doctor that there were dozens of staff, students, and special guests standing directly behind Charlie on the other side of the tent, and he replied:

“It was an absolute miracle that someone else didn’t get killed.”

“His bone was so healthy and the density was so so impressive that he’s like the man of steel. It should have just gone through and through. It likely would have killed those standing behind him too.”

In the end, the coroner did find the bullet just beneath the skin.

Even in death, Charlie managed to save the lives of those around him.

Remarkable. Miraculous.'

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880869&forum_id=2#49987092)

Lack of exit wound given type of round cashapp PayPal said was used is “evidence” being used to explain it as exploding pager by Israel theory

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880869&forum_id=2#49987162)

“COVID! COVID!”

lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880869&forum_id=2#49988373)

The communists will win by default

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880869&forum_id=2#49988198)

https://x.com/polymarket/status/2075295345752330407?s=46

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880869&forum_id=2#49988660)

https://x.com/chrisbrunet/status/2075041922008133761?s=20

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880869&forum_id=2#49988973)

Tyler’s dad: “Tyler did it.”

Tyler’s boyfriend: “Tyler did it.”

All law enforcement: “Tyler did it.”

All evidence: “Tyler did it.”

Tyler Robinson: “I did it”

XO 2026 retards: “No you didn’t”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880869&forum_id=2#49988870)

that said i dont blame c12. i think he's as mystified by how sockfucking stupid our base is as i am.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880869&forum_id=2#49991218)

Tyler's supposed confessions are in the form of that text conversation that hasn't been verified, the Discord message that was sent when according to some police documentation he was already in custody, and that note that got conveniently burned. we have to trust Lance to believe the text convo and note are real and from Tyler.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880869&forum_id=2#49991222)

"Ms. robinson, who do you think did it?"

"My son."

"thank you you may step down"

is this how you think trials work?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880869&forum_id=2#49991219)

i have read about the preliminary hearing and the summary of overwhelming evidence all pointing to tyler robinson as kirk's killer.

if you would even glance at it you would reach the same conclusion provded you have an iq above room temp.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880869&forum_id=2#49991240)

confession to twiggs, he admitted, “I am,” when asked whether he shot Charlie Kirk.

twiggs said robinson cried and stated that he wished he had not done it

handwritten confession note: “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I took it.”

robinson told discord friends, “It was me,” and directed them to compare him with surveillance images.

twiggs identified the person shown in campus surveillance footage as resembling robinson

robinson’s DNA on the towel wrapped around the rifle and on a screwdriver left at the shooting location

police found a bolt-action rifle hidden in woods near the campus and wrapped in a towel

robinson said the weapon was his grandfather’s gun and remarked that it had performed well “today.”

texts showing he remained near the scene hoping to recover the hidden rifle

robinson asked Twiggs to delete their text messages

engraved bullets recovered with the rifle; twiggs said robinson had recently borrowed a tool to engrave bullets

dremel engraving tool and ammunition matching the type recovered with the rifle

robinson left home early that morning while claiming he was traveling to an electrician job

scheduled text and prewritten note that robinson anticipated death or imprisonment before the shooting

robinson wrote that he had “had enough” of Kirk and that “some hate can’t be negotiated out"

twiggs said robinson was pacing, nervous and emotional when he returned home

robinson admitted involvement to friends and family before surrendering

surveillance placed him at UVU four times that day, twice before the shooting, during it, and again that evening

investigator compared the surveillance footage with robinson’s DMV records and identified robinson in court as the person shown

vid showing him (or, 'the killer') entering the rooftop, crawling into a prone firing position, fleeing immediately after the shot with a rifle-shaped object, and running toward the wooded area where the rifle was recovered

robinson walked with a stiff-legged gait before reaching the roof consistent with rifle in his pants

robinson’s mother and father both believed the released surveillance images depicted their son

robinson’s father id'd the rifle as the one that had been given to robinson as a gift

robinson told his mother that he had been home sick on the day of the shooting, contradicting the surveillance evidence

when his father requested a pic of the family rifle after police released its image, robinson did not provide one or respond to the request

robinson told a retired deputy that he had discarded the clothing connected to the shooting in different locations

beyond the towel and screwdriver, DNA consistent with robinson’s was found on the rifle’s trigger, the fired casing, and two unfired cartridge with likelihood ratios of at least one trillion to one mathing robinson

police found a shell casing in his home w/ engravings similar to those on the ammunition recovered with the rifle

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880869&forum_id=2#49991361)

TR's rifle being buried nearby is the strongest piece of evidence tying him to the crime imo. but obviously it's possible someone else (perhaps someone who lived with him) took the gun. other people's DNA was found on the towel, gun, and screwdriver too fwiw.

I've looked at all the photos and vids they've shown so far attempting to prove he was on campus that day. have you? they might be him, they might not. and in the roof video you cannot see the figure at the time where the shot is supposedly taken. they said "we assume" he is crawling into position etc., but it's impossible to actually see that. all you can really make out are the parts where the person is running across the roof and jumping off of it. and again, it may or may not be TR.

that covers all of your items. there's a lot of evidence but it's all quite weak.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880869&forum_id=2#49991405)

Author: steffan miller

no

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880869&forum_id=2#49991509)