The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
RE: The the "It'$ Ju$t a Comet" Gallery of Certified Morons ljl
| Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e | 11/07/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 7th, 2025 9:05 PM Author: Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e ("One Year Performance 1978-1979 (Cage Piece)") (I) THE PATTERN: 66% of INtersellar "Visitors" are F-CKED UP
The laziest argument XO is "space is big and weird."
No. We have a control group u fags
- 1I/'Oumuamua (2017): WEIRD. (Thrust, no tail, weird shape).
- 2I/Borisov (2019): BORINGLY NORMAL. (Had a tail, gassed like a comet. Proved our model works).
- 3I/Atlas (2025): CATASTROPHICALLY WEIRD. (Repeating the "Oumuamua paradox," but with more anomalies).
We are 2-for-3, u fags....
When 66% of your "random" sample breaks known physics, it's not "random" haha
(II) THE CENTRAL PARADOX: It has a FUKINg ENGINE but NO EXHAUSTTT
This is the part XO poa is stupid to connect.
1. It Has "Thrust."
This isn't Loeb.
This is JPL. NASA's own fuking navigation engineer (Farnocchia) confirmed THIS WEEK that 3I/Atlas is exhibiting ONGOING "non-gravitational acceleration."
Something is actively pushing it right now.
2. The "Thrust" has a "Cost."
To produce this much thrust, a "comet" would need to eject a catastrophic amount of its own mass. The math says a minimum of 13-15% of its entire body.
This isn't a puff of smoke. This is a continuous, violent explosion.
3. The "Exhaust" is MISSING.
We just got post-perihelion images (Nov 5) from the Lowell Di$covery Telescope. A 15% mass-loss event would create an **unmistakable, massive** debris tail.What did they see? A "bright ball of light." A "faint glow."
**NO CLEAR EVIDENCE** of the massive tail *required* by the thru$t data.It has the EFFECT of a rocket, with none of the required EVIDENCE of propulsion. Your "comet" model is dead.
(III) THE "IMPOSSIBLE" STACK OF ANOMALIES
If the paradox isn't enough for your den$e skulls, here's the rest of the data that breaks physics.
ANOMALY 1 - The "Industrial" Composition:
Spectra show its gas has "much more nickel than iron." This is not a "puzzle," you fags.
Nickel and iron always occur together in comets. The only known process that separates them like this is the "Mond process"... which is used in industrial nickel refinement.
ANOMALY 2 - The "Clean" Gas:
As it passed the $un, it turned "distinctly bluer." This is from glowing C2 (diatomic carbon) gas, not dust. But the gas is clean. There is no corresponding dust coma. In a normal comet, the gas drags the dust. This fukin thing is ejecting "clean" gas, which breaks the f-cking model.
ANOMALY 3 - The "Non-Random" Orbit:
What are the odds of a random inter$tellar object entering our $ystem on a path that is perfectly aligned (within 5 degrees) of our own ecliptic plane? The statistical chance is 0.2%.
It's not a random rock.
It's on a non-random path.It's exhibiting non-random thru$t.It's gassing non-random, indu$trial-grade material.
The "traditional comet" theory has failed to explain a $ingle one of these facts. Stop. Stop being $heeple |