The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
SCOTUS hits rock bottom, throws out ballroom case for fraud standing issue
| .,..,,.,.,.,.,.,..,.,.,..,.., | 08/31/26 |
| LathamTouchedMe | 08/31/26 |
| 1.618 | 08/31/26 |
| .,..,,.,.,.,.,.,..,.,.,..,.., | 08/31/26 |
| ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, | 08/31/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 31st, 2026 4:56 PM Author: .,..,,.,.,.,.,.,..,.,.,..,.., (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899454&forum_id=2.#50107254) |
Date: August 31st, 2026 5:27 PM Author: LathamTouchedMe The argument for standing was kind of thin. It was a historic preservation trust arguing they would be sad if they saw this ugly ballroom built. But the problem is that the Court's standing doctrine is so difficult, it's hard to see who would have standing here. A taxpayer doesn't have standing even though the admin's action here is clearly unlawful under the budgetary authority. I guess a member of Congress? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899454&forum_id=2.#50107356) |
 |
Date: August 31st, 2026 5:30 PM Author: 1.618 I thought a congressdood would claim usurpation of dat power of da purse (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899454&forum_id=2.#50107362) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2026 5:31 PM Author: .,..,,.,.,.,.,.,..,.,.,..,.., Don't worry, these faggots didn't bother to try and provide guidance on standing. Gotta save that for when dems are back in power. For now if you're not president you don't have standing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5899454&forum_id=2.#50107364) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2026 5:39 PM Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Roberts voted against Trump, to no avail.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/white-house-ballroom-construction-lifeline-scotus-heated-legal-fight |